Cargando…

tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?

The aim of the present study was to clarify the conditions under which anodal tDCS applied to left hemisphere language sites may facilitate picture naming latencies in healthy young adults. We built upon previous studies by directly testing for item-specific and generalized effects of tDCS through m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Joshua S., Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00549
_version_ 1783348018511085568
author Payne, Joshua S.
Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe
author_facet Payne, Joshua S.
Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe
author_sort Payne, Joshua S.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to clarify the conditions under which anodal tDCS applied to left hemisphere language sites may facilitate picture naming latencies in healthy young adults. We built upon previous studies by directly testing for item-specific and generalized effects of tDCS through manipulation of item-familiarization and through testing for both online and offline effects of stimulation, in the same paradigm. In addition, we tested for the robustness of these effects by comparing two left hemisphere sites critical for lexical retrieval. Twenty-eight healthy young adults completed two testing sessions receiving either anodal (1.5 mA, 20 min) or sham stimulation (1.5 mA, 30 s) in each session. Half of the participants received tDCS over the left inferior frontal region and the other half over the left posterior superior temporal region. All participants were asked to a name a set of pictures and their response latencies were compared at three time points (before, during, and after the end of stimulation). The stimulus set was constructed so that some items were presented at all time points, some before and after stimulation, and some during stimulation only. A parsimonious linear mixed effects model (LMM) revealed robust repetition priming effects as latencies were reliably faster for previously named items in all conditions. However, active tDCS did not produce any additional facilitation in relation to sham, and even led to slower performance in the IFG group when the stimulated items differed from those tested at baseline and post-test. Our findings add to the present debate about the efficacy of single-session tDCS for modulation of lexical retrieval in healthy young adults. We conclude that future research should take a more systematic, step-wise approach to the application of tDCS to the study of language and that more sensitive experimental paradigms, which include a training element, are more adapted to the study of cognitive processes in populations with optimal levels of cortical excitability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6095956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60959562018-08-24 tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither? Payne, Joshua S. Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe Front Neurosci Neuroscience The aim of the present study was to clarify the conditions under which anodal tDCS applied to left hemisphere language sites may facilitate picture naming latencies in healthy young adults. We built upon previous studies by directly testing for item-specific and generalized effects of tDCS through manipulation of item-familiarization and through testing for both online and offline effects of stimulation, in the same paradigm. In addition, we tested for the robustness of these effects by comparing two left hemisphere sites critical for lexical retrieval. Twenty-eight healthy young adults completed two testing sessions receiving either anodal (1.5 mA, 20 min) or sham stimulation (1.5 mA, 30 s) in each session. Half of the participants received tDCS over the left inferior frontal region and the other half over the left posterior superior temporal region. All participants were asked to a name a set of pictures and their response latencies were compared at three time points (before, during, and after the end of stimulation). The stimulus set was constructed so that some items were presented at all time points, some before and after stimulation, and some during stimulation only. A parsimonious linear mixed effects model (LMM) revealed robust repetition priming effects as latencies were reliably faster for previously named items in all conditions. However, active tDCS did not produce any additional facilitation in relation to sham, and even led to slower performance in the IFG group when the stimulated items differed from those tested at baseline and post-test. Our findings add to the present debate about the efficacy of single-session tDCS for modulation of lexical retrieval in healthy young adults. We conclude that future research should take a more systematic, step-wise approach to the application of tDCS to the study of language and that more sensitive experimental paradigms, which include a training element, are more adapted to the study of cognitive processes in populations with optimal levels of cortical excitability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6095956/ /pubmed/30147643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00549 Text en Copyright © 2018 Payne and Tainturier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Payne, Joshua S.
Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe
tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?
title tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?
title_full tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?
title_fullStr tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?
title_full_unstemmed tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?
title_short tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?
title_sort tdcs facilitation of picture naming: item-specific, task general, or neither?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00549
work_keys_str_mv AT paynejoshuas tdcsfacilitationofpicturenamingitemspecifictaskgeneralorneither
AT tainturiermariejosephe tdcsfacilitationofpicturenamingitemspecifictaskgeneralorneither