Cargando…

Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years

AIM: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with pessary fitting, continued use of pessary and satisfaction of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who received an initial pessary fitting. The clinical characteristics of thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Junfang, Han, Jinsong, Zhu, Fuli, Wang, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29978415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4844-z
_version_ 1783348128463716352
author Yang, Junfang
Han, Jinsong
Zhu, Fuli
Wang, Yu
author_facet Yang, Junfang
Han, Jinsong
Zhu, Fuli
Wang, Yu
author_sort Yang, Junfang
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with pessary fitting, continued use of pessary and satisfaction of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who received an initial pessary fitting. The clinical characteristics of these patients were recorded. The Pelvic Floor Disability Index PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 were used to assess pelvic floor dysfunction and quality of life. Complications, satisfaction degree, and reasons for abandonment were recorded during the follow-up. T test and Chi square test in SPSS version 20 were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three hundred women with symptomatic prolapse were selected for pessary fitting, whose average age was 67.8 ± 10.7 years. For two hundred and forty-nine (83%) women, the fitting was successful, of whom 162 used ring pessaries and 87 used Gellhorn pessaries. Forty-seven patients abandoned using a pessary at the end of our study. Most clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the successful and unsuccessful fitting groups (P > 0.05). The average score of CRADI-8 was lower in successful fitting group (11.9 ± 15.9) than that in unsuccessful fitting group (18.8 ± 19.9) (P < 0.05). 162 patients with successful pessary fitting completed the satisfaction survey, 79% of whom were satisfied or very satisfied. Erosions (24.4%) were the most common complication. Difficulty in inserting or removing (30.4%) and erosions (22.8%) were the main factors, which affected the satisfaction degree. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obvious symptoms of posterior pelvic prolapse are more likely to fit failure. Difficulty in inserting or removing and erosions are the main factors, which lead to the discontinuation of pessary use and decrease in the satisfaction degree. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-018-4844-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6096563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60965632018-08-24 Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years Yang, Junfang Han, Jinsong Zhu, Fuli Wang, Yu Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology AIM: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with pessary fitting, continued use of pessary and satisfaction of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who received an initial pessary fitting. The clinical characteristics of these patients were recorded. The Pelvic Floor Disability Index PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 were used to assess pelvic floor dysfunction and quality of life. Complications, satisfaction degree, and reasons for abandonment were recorded during the follow-up. T test and Chi square test in SPSS version 20 were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three hundred women with symptomatic prolapse were selected for pessary fitting, whose average age was 67.8 ± 10.7 years. For two hundred and forty-nine (83%) women, the fitting was successful, of whom 162 used ring pessaries and 87 used Gellhorn pessaries. Forty-seven patients abandoned using a pessary at the end of our study. Most clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the successful and unsuccessful fitting groups (P > 0.05). The average score of CRADI-8 was lower in successful fitting group (11.9 ± 15.9) than that in unsuccessful fitting group (18.8 ± 19.9) (P < 0.05). 162 patients with successful pessary fitting completed the satisfaction survey, 79% of whom were satisfied or very satisfied. Erosions (24.4%) were the most common complication. Difficulty in inserting or removing (30.4%) and erosions (22.8%) were the main factors, which affected the satisfaction degree. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obvious symptoms of posterior pelvic prolapse are more likely to fit failure. Difficulty in inserting or removing and erosions are the main factors, which lead to the discontinuation of pessary use and decrease in the satisfaction degree. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-018-4844-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6096563/ /pubmed/29978415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4844-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Yang, Junfang
Han, Jinsong
Zhu, Fuli
Wang, Yu
Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
title Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
title_full Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
title_fullStr Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
title_full_unstemmed Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
title_short Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
title_sort ring and gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29978415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4844-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjunfang ringandgellhornpessariesusedinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapsearetrospectivestudyof8years
AT hanjinsong ringandgellhornpessariesusedinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapsearetrospectivestudyof8years
AT zhufuli ringandgellhornpessariesusedinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapsearetrospectivestudyof8years
AT wangyu ringandgellhornpessariesusedinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapsearetrospectivestudyof8years