Cargando…

Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. METHODS: Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thust, S. C., Hassanein, S., Bisdas, S., Rees, J. H., Hyare, H., Maynard, J. A., Brandner, S., Tur, C., Jäger, H. R., Yousry, T. A., Mancini, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0
_version_ 1783348134823329792
author Thust, S. C.
Hassanein, S.
Bisdas, S.
Rees, J. H.
Hyare, H.
Maynard, J. A.
Brandner, S.
Tur, C.
Jäger, H. R.
Yousry, T. A.
Mancini, L.
author_facet Thust, S. C.
Hassanein, S.
Bisdas, S.
Rees, J. H.
Hyare, H.
Maynard, J. A.
Brandner, S.
Tur, C.
Jäger, H. R.
Yousry, T. A.
Mancini, L.
author_sort Thust, S. C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. METHODS: Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with ADC mean (ADC(mean)) calculated. For the slice analysis, two observers placed regions of interest in the largest tumour cross-section. The ratio (ADC(ratio)) between ADC(mean) in the tumour and normal appearing white matter was calculated for both methods. RESULTS: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas showed the lowest ADC values throughout (p < 0.001). ADC(mean) in the IDH-mutant 1p19q intact group was significantly higher than in the IDH-mutant 1p19q co-deleted group (p < 0.01). A volumetric ADC(mean) threshold of 1201 × 10(−6) mm(2)/s identified IDH wild-type with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 86%; a volumetric ADC(ratio) cut-off value of 1.65 provided a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 92% (area under the curve (AUC) 0.9–0.94). A slice ADC(ratio) threshold for observer 1 (observer 2) of 1.76 (1.83) provided a sensitivity of 80% (86%), specificity of 91% (100%) and AUC of 0.95 (0.96). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). CONCLUSIONS: ADC measurements can support the distinction of glioma subtypes. Volumetric and two-dimensional measurements yielded similar results in this study. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted MRI aids the identification of non-gadolinium-enhancing malignant gliomas • ADC measurements may permit non-gadolinium-enhancing glioma molecular subtyping • IDH wild-type gliomas have lower ADC values than IDH-mutant tumours • Single cross-section and volumetric ADC measurements yielded comparable results in this study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6096613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60966132018-08-24 Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis Thust, S. C. Hassanein, S. Bisdas, S. Rees, J. H. Hyare, H. Maynard, J. A. Brandner, S. Tur, C. Jäger, H. R. Yousry, T. A. Mancini, L. Eur Radiol Neuro OBJECTIVES: To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. METHODS: Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with ADC mean (ADC(mean)) calculated. For the slice analysis, two observers placed regions of interest in the largest tumour cross-section. The ratio (ADC(ratio)) between ADC(mean) in the tumour and normal appearing white matter was calculated for both methods. RESULTS: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas showed the lowest ADC values throughout (p < 0.001). ADC(mean) in the IDH-mutant 1p19q intact group was significantly higher than in the IDH-mutant 1p19q co-deleted group (p < 0.01). A volumetric ADC(mean) threshold of 1201 × 10(−6) mm(2)/s identified IDH wild-type with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 86%; a volumetric ADC(ratio) cut-off value of 1.65 provided a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 92% (area under the curve (AUC) 0.9–0.94). A slice ADC(ratio) threshold for observer 1 (observer 2) of 1.76 (1.83) provided a sensitivity of 80% (86%), specificity of 91% (100%) and AUC of 0.95 (0.96). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). CONCLUSIONS: ADC measurements can support the distinction of glioma subtypes. Volumetric and two-dimensional measurements yielded similar results in this study. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted MRI aids the identification of non-gadolinium-enhancing malignant gliomas • ADC measurements may permit non-gadolinium-enhancing glioma molecular subtyping • IDH wild-type gliomas have lower ADC values than IDH-mutant tumours • Single cross-section and volumetric ADC measurements yielded comparable results in this study Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6096613/ /pubmed/29572636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Neuro
Thust, S. C.
Hassanein, S.
Bisdas, S.
Rees, J. H.
Hyare, H.
Maynard, J. A.
Brandner, S.
Tur, C.
Jäger, H. R.
Yousry, T. A.
Mancini, L.
Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
title Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
title_full Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
title_fullStr Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
title_full_unstemmed Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
title_short Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
title_sort apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing who grade ii/iii glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
topic Neuro
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0
work_keys_str_mv AT thustsc apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT hassaneins apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT bisdass apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT reesjh apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT hyareh apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT maynardja apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT brandners apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT turc apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT jagerhr apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT yousryta apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis
AT mancinil apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis