Cargando…
Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. METHODS: Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0 |
_version_ | 1783348134823329792 |
---|---|
author | Thust, S. C. Hassanein, S. Bisdas, S. Rees, J. H. Hyare, H. Maynard, J. A. Brandner, S. Tur, C. Jäger, H. R. Yousry, T. A. Mancini, L. |
author_facet | Thust, S. C. Hassanein, S. Bisdas, S. Rees, J. H. Hyare, H. Maynard, J. A. Brandner, S. Tur, C. Jäger, H. R. Yousry, T. A. Mancini, L. |
author_sort | Thust, S. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. METHODS: Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with ADC mean (ADC(mean)) calculated. For the slice analysis, two observers placed regions of interest in the largest tumour cross-section. The ratio (ADC(ratio)) between ADC(mean) in the tumour and normal appearing white matter was calculated for both methods. RESULTS: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas showed the lowest ADC values throughout (p < 0.001). ADC(mean) in the IDH-mutant 1p19q intact group was significantly higher than in the IDH-mutant 1p19q co-deleted group (p < 0.01). A volumetric ADC(mean) threshold of 1201 × 10(−6) mm(2)/s identified IDH wild-type with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 86%; a volumetric ADC(ratio) cut-off value of 1.65 provided a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 92% (area under the curve (AUC) 0.9–0.94). A slice ADC(ratio) threshold for observer 1 (observer 2) of 1.76 (1.83) provided a sensitivity of 80% (86%), specificity of 91% (100%) and AUC of 0.95 (0.96). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). CONCLUSIONS: ADC measurements can support the distinction of glioma subtypes. Volumetric and two-dimensional measurements yielded similar results in this study. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted MRI aids the identification of non-gadolinium-enhancing malignant gliomas • ADC measurements may permit non-gadolinium-enhancing glioma molecular subtyping • IDH wild-type gliomas have lower ADC values than IDH-mutant tumours • Single cross-section and volumetric ADC measurements yielded comparable results in this study |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6096613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60966132018-08-24 Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis Thust, S. C. Hassanein, S. Bisdas, S. Rees, J. H. Hyare, H. Maynard, J. A. Brandner, S. Tur, C. Jäger, H. R. Yousry, T. A. Mancini, L. Eur Radiol Neuro OBJECTIVES: To investigate if quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements can predict genetic subtypes of non-gadolinium-enhancing gliomas, comparing whole tumour against single slice analysis. METHODS: Volumetric T2-derived masks of 44 gliomas were co-registered to ADC maps with ADC mean (ADC(mean)) calculated. For the slice analysis, two observers placed regions of interest in the largest tumour cross-section. The ratio (ADC(ratio)) between ADC(mean) in the tumour and normal appearing white matter was calculated for both methods. RESULTS: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas showed the lowest ADC values throughout (p < 0.001). ADC(mean) in the IDH-mutant 1p19q intact group was significantly higher than in the IDH-mutant 1p19q co-deleted group (p < 0.01). A volumetric ADC(mean) threshold of 1201 × 10(−6) mm(2)/s identified IDH wild-type with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 86%; a volumetric ADC(ratio) cut-off value of 1.65 provided a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 92% (area under the curve (AUC) 0.9–0.94). A slice ADC(ratio) threshold for observer 1 (observer 2) of 1.76 (1.83) provided a sensitivity of 80% (86%), specificity of 91% (100%) and AUC of 0.95 (0.96). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (0.98). CONCLUSIONS: ADC measurements can support the distinction of glioma subtypes. Volumetric and two-dimensional measurements yielded similar results in this study. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted MRI aids the identification of non-gadolinium-enhancing malignant gliomas • ADC measurements may permit non-gadolinium-enhancing glioma molecular subtyping • IDH wild-type gliomas have lower ADC values than IDH-mutant tumours • Single cross-section and volumetric ADC measurements yielded comparable results in this study Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6096613/ /pubmed/29572636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Neuro Thust, S. C. Hassanein, S. Bisdas, S. Rees, J. H. Hyare, H. Maynard, J. A. Brandner, S. Tur, C. Jäger, H. R. Yousry, T. A. Mancini, L. Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
title | Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
title_full | Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
title_fullStr | Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
title_short | Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
title_sort | apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing who grade ii/iii glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis |
topic | Neuro |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5351-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thustsc apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT hassaneins apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT bisdass apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT reesjh apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT hyareh apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT maynardja apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT brandners apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT turc apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT jagerhr apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT yousryta apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis AT mancinil apparentdiffusioncoefficientformolecularsubtypingofnongadoliniumenhancingwhogradeiiiiigliomavolumetricsegmentationversustwodimensionalregionofinterestanalysis |