Cargando…
No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory
When detecting changes in visual features (e.g., colour or shape), object locations, represented as points within a configuration, might also be automatically represented in working memory. If the configuration of a scene is represented automatically, the locations of individual items might form par...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29777438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0814-8 |
_version_ | 1783348141407338496 |
---|---|
author | Udale, Rob Farrell, Simon Kent, Christopher |
author_facet | Udale, Rob Farrell, Simon Kent, Christopher |
author_sort | Udale, Rob |
collection | PubMed |
description | When detecting changes in visual features (e.g., colour or shape), object locations, represented as points within a configuration, might also be automatically represented in working memory. If the configuration of a scene is represented automatically, the locations of individual items might form part of this representation, irrespective of their relevance to the task. Participants took part in a change-detection task in which they studied displays containing different sets of items (shapes, letters, objects), which varied in their task relevance. Specifically, they were asked to remember the features of two sets, and ignore the third set. During the retention interval, an audio cue indicated which of the to-be-remembered sets would become the target set (having a 50% probability of containing a new feature). At test, they were asked to indicate whether a new feature was present amongst the target set. We measured binding of individual items to the configuration by manipulating the locations of the different sets so that their position in the test display either matched or mismatched their original location in the study display. If items are automatically bound to the configuration, location changes should disrupt performance, even if they were explicitly instructed not to remember the features of that particular set of items. There was no effect on performance of changing the locations of any of the sets between study and test displays, indicating that the configural representation did not enter their decision stage, and therefore that individual item representations are not necessarily bound to the configuration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6096642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60966422018-08-24 No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory Udale, Rob Farrell, Simon Kent, Christopher Mem Cognit Article When detecting changes in visual features (e.g., colour or shape), object locations, represented as points within a configuration, might also be automatically represented in working memory. If the configuration of a scene is represented automatically, the locations of individual items might form part of this representation, irrespective of their relevance to the task. Participants took part in a change-detection task in which they studied displays containing different sets of items (shapes, letters, objects), which varied in their task relevance. Specifically, they were asked to remember the features of two sets, and ignore the third set. During the retention interval, an audio cue indicated which of the to-be-remembered sets would become the target set (having a 50% probability of containing a new feature). At test, they were asked to indicate whether a new feature was present amongst the target set. We measured binding of individual items to the configuration by manipulating the locations of the different sets so that their position in the test display either matched or mismatched their original location in the study display. If items are automatically bound to the configuration, location changes should disrupt performance, even if they were explicitly instructed not to remember the features of that particular set of items. There was no effect on performance of changing the locations of any of the sets between study and test displays, indicating that the configural representation did not enter their decision stage, and therefore that individual item representations are not necessarily bound to the configuration. Springer US 2018-05-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6096642/ /pubmed/29777438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0814-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Udale, Rob Farrell, Simon Kent, Christopher No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
title | No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
title_full | No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
title_fullStr | No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
title_full_unstemmed | No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
title_short | No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
title_sort | no evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29777438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0814-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT udalerob noevidenceofbindingitemstospatialconfigurationrepresentationsinvisualworkingmemory AT farrellsimon noevidenceofbindingitemstospatialconfigurationrepresentationsinvisualworkingmemory AT kentchristopher noevidenceofbindingitemstospatialconfigurationrepresentationsinvisualworkingmemory |