Cargando…
How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers’ decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6 |
_version_ | 1783348143691137024 |
---|---|
author | Pleskac, Timothy J. Cesario, Joseph Johnson, David J. |
author_facet | Pleskac, Timothy J. Cesario, Joseph Johnson, David J. |
author_sort | Pleskac, Timothy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers’ decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show that Black targets are shot more frequently and more quickly than Whites. The decision to shoot has typically been modeled and understood as a signal detection process in which a sample of information is compared against a criterion, with the criterion set for Black targets being lower. We take a different approach, modeling the decision to shoot as a dynamic process in which evidence is accumulated over time until a threshold is reached. The model accounts for both the choice and response time data for both correct and incorrect decisions using a single set of parameters. Across four studies, this dynamic perspective revealed that the target’s race did not create an initial bias to shoot Black targets. Instead, race impacted the rate of evidence accumulation with evidence accumulating faster to shoot for Black targets. Some participants also tended to be more cautious with Black targets, setting higher decision thresholds. Besides providing a more cohesive and richer account of the decision to shoot or not, the dynamic model suggests interventions that may address the use of race information in decisions to shoot and a means to measure their effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6096652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60966522018-08-24 How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot Pleskac, Timothy J. Cesario, Joseph Johnson, David J. Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical Review The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers’ decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show that Black targets are shot more frequently and more quickly than Whites. The decision to shoot has typically been modeled and understood as a signal detection process in which a sample of information is compared against a criterion, with the criterion set for Black targets being lower. We take a different approach, modeling the decision to shoot as a dynamic process in which evidence is accumulated over time until a threshold is reached. The model accounts for both the choice and response time data for both correct and incorrect decisions using a single set of parameters. Across four studies, this dynamic perspective revealed that the target’s race did not create an initial bias to shoot Black targets. Instead, race impacted the rate of evidence accumulation with evidence accumulating faster to shoot for Black targets. Some participants also tended to be more cautious with Black targets, setting higher decision thresholds. Besides providing a more cohesive and richer account of the decision to shoot or not, the dynamic model suggests interventions that may address the use of race information in decisions to shoot and a means to measure their effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-10-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6096652/ /pubmed/28983838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Theoretical Review Pleskac, Timothy J. Cesario, Joseph Johnson, David J. How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
title | How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
title_full | How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
title_fullStr | How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
title_full_unstemmed | How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
title_short | How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
title_sort | how race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot |
topic | Theoretical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pleskactimothyj howraceaffectsevidenceaccumulationduringthedecisiontoshoot AT cesariojoseph howraceaffectsevidenceaccumulationduringthedecisiontoshoot AT johnsondavidj howraceaffectsevidenceaccumulationduringthedecisiontoshoot |