Cargando…

How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot

The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers’ decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pleskac, Timothy J., Cesario, Joseph, Johnson, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6
_version_ 1783348143691137024
author Pleskac, Timothy J.
Cesario, Joseph
Johnson, David J.
author_facet Pleskac, Timothy J.
Cesario, Joseph
Johnson, David J.
author_sort Pleskac, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers’ decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show that Black targets are shot more frequently and more quickly than Whites. The decision to shoot has typically been modeled and understood as a signal detection process in which a sample of information is compared against a criterion, with the criterion set for Black targets being lower. We take a different approach, modeling the decision to shoot as a dynamic process in which evidence is accumulated over time until a threshold is reached. The model accounts for both the choice and response time data for both correct and incorrect decisions using a single set of parameters. Across four studies, this dynamic perspective revealed that the target’s race did not create an initial bias to shoot Black targets. Instead, race impacted the rate of evidence accumulation with evidence accumulating faster to shoot for Black targets. Some participants also tended to be more cautious with Black targets, setting higher decision thresholds. Besides providing a more cohesive and richer account of the decision to shoot or not, the dynamic model suggests interventions that may address the use of race information in decisions to shoot and a means to measure their effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6096652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60966522018-08-24 How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot Pleskac, Timothy J. Cesario, Joseph Johnson, David J. Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical Review The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers’ decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show that Black targets are shot more frequently and more quickly than Whites. The decision to shoot has typically been modeled and understood as a signal detection process in which a sample of information is compared against a criterion, with the criterion set for Black targets being lower. We take a different approach, modeling the decision to shoot as a dynamic process in which evidence is accumulated over time until a threshold is reached. The model accounts for both the choice and response time data for both correct and incorrect decisions using a single set of parameters. Across four studies, this dynamic perspective revealed that the target’s race did not create an initial bias to shoot Black targets. Instead, race impacted the rate of evidence accumulation with evidence accumulating faster to shoot for Black targets. Some participants also tended to be more cautious with Black targets, setting higher decision thresholds. Besides providing a more cohesive and richer account of the decision to shoot or not, the dynamic model suggests interventions that may address the use of race information in decisions to shoot and a means to measure their effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-10-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6096652/ /pubmed/28983838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Theoretical Review
Pleskac, Timothy J.
Cesario, Joseph
Johnson, David J.
How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
title How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
title_full How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
title_fullStr How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
title_full_unstemmed How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
title_short How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
title_sort how race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot
topic Theoretical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6
work_keys_str_mv AT pleskactimothyj howraceaffectsevidenceaccumulationduringthedecisiontoshoot
AT cesariojoseph howraceaffectsevidenceaccumulationduringthedecisiontoshoot
AT johnsondavidj howraceaffectsevidenceaccumulationduringthedecisiontoshoot