Cargando…

Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients

BACKGROUND: To present a protocol of a prospective, cohort study in which four groups of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients will participate. (Patients with indwelling urethral catheter; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation without wearing a penile sheath; patients who perform intermitte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaidyanathan, Subramanian, Soni, Bhakul M, Gurpreet, Singh, Mansour, Paul, Hughes, Peter L, Oo, Tun, Sett, Pradipkumar, Parsons, Keith F, Davies, John C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC60970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11734072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-1-2
_version_ 1782120122668810240
author Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
Soni, Bhakul M
Gurpreet, Singh
Mansour, Paul
Hughes, Peter L
Oo, Tun
Sett, Pradipkumar
Parsons, Keith F
Davies, John C
author_facet Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
Soni, Bhakul M
Gurpreet, Singh
Mansour, Paul
Hughes, Peter L
Oo, Tun
Sett, Pradipkumar
Parsons, Keith F
Davies, John C
author_sort Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To present a protocol of a prospective, cohort study in which four groups of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients will participate. (Patients with indwelling urethral catheter; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation without wearing a penile sheath; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation and wear penile sheath as well; and patients with penile sheath drainage). OBJECTIVES: (1) What is the incidence of symptomatic urinary infection in men with spinal cord injury who use different types of bladder drainage? (2) Which are predisposing factors for the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection in men with spinal cord injury who practise different methods of bladder drainage? (3) What is the incidence of catheter and urinary drainage system-related adverse events in the four groups of SCI patients? PATIENTS: The criteria for inclusion are as follow: (1) Male patients with neuropathic bladder due to spinal cord injury, who are registered with the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, England. (2) Age: 18 years or above. (3) Patients who are willing to give informed consent for participation in the study. (4) Patients willing to be contacted every two weeks by a staff of the spinal unit for 36 months. (5) Patients who are willing to maintain an accurate record of adverse events related to urinary catheter and urinary drainage system and predisposing factors for the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection. (6) Patients, who are stabilised in a particular method of bladder drainage, and therefore, unlikely to make a permanent change in the method of bladder drainage (e.g. from penile sheath drainage to the use of long-term indwelling catheter) during a foreseeable future. METHODS: The participants will be observed for a period of 36 months. A staff of the spinal injuries unit will contact the participants by telephone every two weeks on a mutually agreed day and time. The information obtained during this standardised telephonic interview conducted once in two weeks will be entered in a database. When a participant develops symptom(s) suggestive of urinary infection, he will undergo urine and blood tests, and imaging studies of the urinary tract. CONCLUSION: This study will provide information regarding the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, predisposing factors for development of urinary infection, and adverse events related to urinary catheter and urinary drainage system in SCI patients using different methods of bladder drainage.
format Text
id pubmed-60970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-609702001-12-13 Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients Vaidyanathan, Subramanian Soni, Bhakul M Gurpreet, Singh Mansour, Paul Hughes, Peter L Oo, Tun Sett, Pradipkumar Parsons, Keith F Davies, John C BMC Urol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: To present a protocol of a prospective, cohort study in which four groups of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients will participate. (Patients with indwelling urethral catheter; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation without wearing a penile sheath; patients who perform intermittent catheterisation and wear penile sheath as well; and patients with penile sheath drainage). OBJECTIVES: (1) What is the incidence of symptomatic urinary infection in men with spinal cord injury who use different types of bladder drainage? (2) Which are predisposing factors for the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection in men with spinal cord injury who practise different methods of bladder drainage? (3) What is the incidence of catheter and urinary drainage system-related adverse events in the four groups of SCI patients? PATIENTS: The criteria for inclusion are as follow: (1) Male patients with neuropathic bladder due to spinal cord injury, who are registered with the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, England. (2) Age: 18 years or above. (3) Patients who are willing to give informed consent for participation in the study. (4) Patients willing to be contacted every two weeks by a staff of the spinal unit for 36 months. (5) Patients who are willing to maintain an accurate record of adverse events related to urinary catheter and urinary drainage system and predisposing factors for the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection. (6) Patients, who are stabilised in a particular method of bladder drainage, and therefore, unlikely to make a permanent change in the method of bladder drainage (e.g. from penile sheath drainage to the use of long-term indwelling catheter) during a foreseeable future. METHODS: The participants will be observed for a period of 36 months. A staff of the spinal injuries unit will contact the participants by telephone every two weeks on a mutually agreed day and time. The information obtained during this standardised telephonic interview conducted once in two weeks will be entered in a database. When a participant develops symptom(s) suggestive of urinary infection, he will undergo urine and blood tests, and imaging studies of the urinary tract. CONCLUSION: This study will provide information regarding the occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, predisposing factors for development of urinary infection, and adverse events related to urinary catheter and urinary drainage system in SCI patients using different methods of bladder drainage. BioMed Central 2001-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC60970/ /pubmed/11734072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-1-2 Text en Copyright © 2001 Vaidyanathan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
Soni, Bhakul M
Gurpreet, Singh
Mansour, Paul
Hughes, Peter L
Oo, Tun
Sett, Pradipkumar
Parsons, Keith F
Davies, John C
Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
title Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
title_full Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
title_fullStr Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
title_full_unstemmed Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
title_short Protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
title_sort protocol of a prospective cohort study of the effect of different methods of drainage of neuropathic bladder on occurrence of symptomatic urinary infection, and adverse events related to the urinary drainage system in spinal cord injury patients
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC60970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11734072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-1-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidyanathansubramanian protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT sonibhakulm protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT gurpreetsingh protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT mansourpaul protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT hughespeterl protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT ootun protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT settpradipkumar protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT parsonskeithf protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients
AT daviesjohnc protocolofaprospectivecohortstudyoftheeffectofdifferentmethodsofdrainageofneuropathicbladderonoccurrenceofsymptomaticurinaryinfectionandadverseeventsrelatedtotheurinarydrainagesysteminspinalcordinjurypatients