Cargando…

Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intravesical antibiotics (IVA) has been used for prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence and consensus on its use. We conducted a systematic review to collect all available data about the effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pietropaolo, Amelia, Jones, Patrick, Moors, Mike, Birch, Brian, Somani, Bhaskar K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0834-8
_version_ 1783348229540151296
author Pietropaolo, Amelia
Jones, Patrick
Moors, Mike
Birch, Brian
Somani, Bhaskar K.
author_facet Pietropaolo, Amelia
Jones, Patrick
Moors, Mike
Birch, Brian
Somani, Bhaskar K.
author_sort Pietropaolo, Amelia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intravesical antibiotics (IVA) has been used for prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence and consensus on its use. We conducted a systematic review to collect all available data about the effectiveness of IVA in prevention and treatment of rUTIs and to give an overview on the outcomes to date. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out for all English language articles from inception to August 2017, according to the Cochrane and PRISMA standards using MEDLINE, Scopus, Biomed Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science with references cross-checked and individual urology journals hand-searched. RESULTS: After an initial identification of 658 studies, we screened 37 abstracts and 18 full-text papers of which 11 were included in our final review. This included 285 patients with a mean age of 52 years and a female:male ratio of 129:117. The IVA used was gentamicin, neomycin/polymyxin, neomycin or colistin and IVA was used for rUTIs as prophylaxis in 5 studies (n = 168) and treatment in 6 studies (n = 117). Overall, a good reduction in symptomatic UTI was seen in 78%, with a short-term success rate and discontinuation rates of 71% (120/168) and 8% (14/168) in the prophylaxis group and 88% (103/117) and 5% (6/117) in the treatment groups respectively. There was a change in the sensitivity of organisms in 30% (50/168) and 23% (27/117) in the treatment and prophylaxis groups respectively. Twenty patients discontinued their IVA instillations which were higher for the non-gentamicin group (11%) compared to the gentamicin group (5%). The side effects were minor and included allergy, suprapubic discomfort, autonomic dysreflexia, urinary tract infections and diarrhoea. SUMMARY: Intravesical antimicrobial instillation seems to be a relatively safe and effective method for the prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent UTIs, especially in the short term. It gives clinicians an alternative treatment modality in high-risk patients predisposed to UTIs where all other forms of systemic treatments have failed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60970672018-08-24 Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review Pietropaolo, Amelia Jones, Patrick Moors, Mike Birch, Brian Somani, Bhaskar K. Curr Urol Rep Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (J Sandhu, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intravesical antibiotics (IVA) has been used for prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence and consensus on its use. We conducted a systematic review to collect all available data about the effectiveness of IVA in prevention and treatment of rUTIs and to give an overview on the outcomes to date. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out for all English language articles from inception to August 2017, according to the Cochrane and PRISMA standards using MEDLINE, Scopus, Biomed Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science with references cross-checked and individual urology journals hand-searched. RESULTS: After an initial identification of 658 studies, we screened 37 abstracts and 18 full-text papers of which 11 were included in our final review. This included 285 patients with a mean age of 52 years and a female:male ratio of 129:117. The IVA used was gentamicin, neomycin/polymyxin, neomycin or colistin and IVA was used for rUTIs as prophylaxis in 5 studies (n = 168) and treatment in 6 studies (n = 117). Overall, a good reduction in symptomatic UTI was seen in 78%, with a short-term success rate and discontinuation rates of 71% (120/168) and 8% (14/168) in the prophylaxis group and 88% (103/117) and 5% (6/117) in the treatment groups respectively. There was a change in the sensitivity of organisms in 30% (50/168) and 23% (27/117) in the treatment and prophylaxis groups respectively. Twenty patients discontinued their IVA instillations which were higher for the non-gentamicin group (11%) compared to the gentamicin group (5%). The side effects were minor and included allergy, suprapubic discomfort, autonomic dysreflexia, urinary tract infections and diarrhoea. SUMMARY: Intravesical antimicrobial instillation seems to be a relatively safe and effective method for the prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent UTIs, especially in the short term. It gives clinicians an alternative treatment modality in high-risk patients predisposed to UTIs where all other forms of systemic treatments have failed. Springer US 2018-08-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6097067/ /pubmed/30094687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0834-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (J Sandhu, Section Editor)
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Jones, Patrick
Moors, Mike
Birch, Brian
Somani, Bhaskar K.
Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review
title Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review
title_full Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review
title_short Use and Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Intravesical Treatment for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): a Systematic Review
title_sort use and effectiveness of antimicrobial intravesical treatment for prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections (utis): a systematic review
topic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (J Sandhu, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0834-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pietropaoloamelia useandeffectivenessofantimicrobialintravesicaltreatmentforprophylaxisandtreatmentofrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsutisasystematicreview
AT jonespatrick useandeffectivenessofantimicrobialintravesicaltreatmentforprophylaxisandtreatmentofrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsutisasystematicreview
AT moorsmike useandeffectivenessofantimicrobialintravesicaltreatmentforprophylaxisandtreatmentofrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsutisasystematicreview
AT birchbrian useandeffectivenessofantimicrobialintravesicaltreatmentforprophylaxisandtreatmentofrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsutisasystematicreview
AT somanibhaskark useandeffectivenessofantimicrobialintravesicaltreatmentforprophylaxisandtreatmentofrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsutisasystematicreview