Cargando…
A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer
BACKGROUND: We compared efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine therapy followed by capecitabine for maintenance (PACX) versus cisplatin/capecitabine therapy (XP) in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in China (December 2009–February 2014)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29488121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0809-y |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: We compared efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine therapy followed by capecitabine for maintenance (PACX) versus cisplatin/capecitabine therapy (XP) in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in China (December 2009–February 2014). Adults (n = 320) with histologically confirmed, untreated metastatic/unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; with ≥ 1 measureable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 criteria; Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 and life expectancy ≥ 3 months were randomized (1:1) to PACX or XP. PACX group received paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) intravenous on days 1 and 8; capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally BD on days 1–14, followed by a 7-day rest interval for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance capecitabine at same dosage/schedule until disease progression, unendurable adverse events or death. XP group received cisplatin intravenous 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine at same dosage/schedule as PACX group per cycle for 6 cycles. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival (5.0 versus 5.3 months; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.906; 0.706–1.164; p = 0.44) and overall survival (12.5 versus 11.8 months; hazard ratio: 0.878 [0.685–1.125]; p = 0.30) were not significantly different between PACX and XP groups. Objective response rate was significantly higher (43.1 versus 28.8%; p = 0.012) and disease control rate was similar (77.5 versus 72.5%; p = 0.75) in PACX versus XP, respectively. Quality of life was significantly improved in PACX versus XP after three treatment cycles. Many treatment-related adverse events were significantly lesser in PACX than XP. CONCLUSIONS: First-line chemotherapy with PACX is effective with milder toxicities in advanced gastric cancer, but could not replace XP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10120-018-0809-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
---|