Cargando…

SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS

BACKGROUND: The search for less traumatic surgical procedures without compromising efficacy and safety, together with the technological advances and greater experience of the teams, led to the development of operative techniques with increasingly smaller incisions, the so-called “minimally invasive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FAVARO, Murillo de Lima, GABOR, Silvio, PEDROSO, Ruy Francisco Pimentel, RIBEIRO, Ligia, ROSA, Otto Mauro, RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1388
_version_ 1783348239696658432
author FAVARO, Murillo de Lima
GABOR, Silvio
PEDROSO, Ruy Francisco Pimentel
RIBEIRO, Ligia
ROSA, Otto Mauro
RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle
author_facet FAVARO, Murillo de Lima
GABOR, Silvio
PEDROSO, Ruy Francisco Pimentel
RIBEIRO, Ligia
ROSA, Otto Mauro
RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle
author_sort FAVARO, Murillo de Lima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The search for less traumatic surgical procedures without compromising efficacy and safety, together with the technological advances and greater experience of the teams, led to the development of operative techniques with increasingly smaller incisions, the so-called “minimally invasive surgeries”. AIM: To evaluate the technical aspects and results of single port cholecystectomy. METHOD: Were analyzed 170 patients between 18-74 years submitted to videolaparoscopic cholecystectomies by single port, regardless of elective or urgent indication, without restriction of patient selection. RESULTS: Among the 170 operations, 158 were exclusively performed by single port, and the conversion rate was 7% (inclusion of other accessory trocars or conversion to multiportal). Conversion to open surgery occurred in three cases (1.76%). The mean surgical time was 67.97 min, showing a marked decrease when was reached close to 50 cases and a stabilization after 100 surgeries. The overall complication rate was 10%, with minor complications such as: incisional pain, hematomas, granulomas, port access hernias (9.41%). CONCLUSION: Single port cholecystectomy can, after standardization and surgical team training, be a safe surgical procedure associated with a recognized aesthetic advantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60971102018-08-23 SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS FAVARO, Murillo de Lima GABOR, Silvio PEDROSO, Ruy Francisco Pimentel RIBEIRO, Ligia ROSA, Otto Mauro RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: The search for less traumatic surgical procedures without compromising efficacy and safety, together with the technological advances and greater experience of the teams, led to the development of operative techniques with increasingly smaller incisions, the so-called “minimally invasive surgeries”. AIM: To evaluate the technical aspects and results of single port cholecystectomy. METHOD: Were analyzed 170 patients between 18-74 years submitted to videolaparoscopic cholecystectomies by single port, regardless of elective or urgent indication, without restriction of patient selection. RESULTS: Among the 170 operations, 158 were exclusively performed by single port, and the conversion rate was 7% (inclusion of other accessory trocars or conversion to multiportal). Conversion to open surgery occurred in three cases (1.76%). The mean surgical time was 67.97 min, showing a marked decrease when was reached close to 50 cases and a stabilization after 100 surgeries. The overall complication rate was 10%, with minor complications such as: incisional pain, hematomas, granulomas, port access hernias (9.41%). CONCLUSION: Single port cholecystectomy can, after standardization and surgical team training, be a safe surgical procedure associated with a recognized aesthetic advantage. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6097110/ /pubmed/30133680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1388 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
FAVARO, Murillo de Lima
GABOR, Silvio
PEDROSO, Ruy Francisco Pimentel
RIBEIRO, Ligia
ROSA, Otto Mauro
RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle
SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS
title SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS
title_full SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS
title_fullStr SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS
title_full_unstemmed SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS
title_short SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS
title_sort single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical aspects and results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1388
work_keys_str_mv AT favaromurillodelima singleportlaparoscopiccholecystectomytechnicalaspectsandresults
AT gaborsilvio singleportlaparoscopiccholecystectomytechnicalaspectsandresults
AT pedrosoruyfranciscopimentel singleportlaparoscopiccholecystectomytechnicalaspectsandresults
AT ribeiroligia singleportlaparoscopiccholecystectomytechnicalaspectsandresults
AT rosaottomauro singleportlaparoscopiccholecystectomytechnicalaspectsandresults
AT ribeirojuniormarceloaugustofontenelle singleportlaparoscopiccholecystectomytechnicalaspectsandresults