Cargando…

Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic support with Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) devices is becoming a more prevalent treatment option for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There exists only limited published data regarding outcome differences between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doshi, Rajkumar, Patel, Krunalkumar, Decter, Dean, Jauhar, Rajiv, Meraj, Perwaiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009
_version_ 1783348251456438272
author Doshi, Rajkumar
Patel, Krunalkumar
Decter, Dean
Jauhar, Rajiv
Meraj, Perwaiz
author_facet Doshi, Rajkumar
Patel, Krunalkumar
Decter, Dean
Jauhar, Rajiv
Meraj, Perwaiz
author_sort Doshi, Rajkumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic support with Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) devices is becoming a more prevalent treatment option for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There exists only limited published data regarding outcome differences between male and female patients. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze these gender differences between short-term survival and in-hospital outcomes in those undergoing PCI with CS. METHODS: Between January 2011 and July 2016, patients undergoing PCI with simultaneous use of Impella were identified. Only patients presenting with CS were included in the analysis. All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Using SAS 9.4 for propensity score matching, additional secondary outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome was comparable between males and females (39.5% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.33) in CS patients. Secondary outcomes were also comparable and included: myocardial infarction, stroke, CS, heart failure, dialysis requirement, bleeding within 72 h, blood transfusion, dysrhythmia, composite of all complications, major adverse cardiac events. Survival at 30 days was equal in both groups. A reduced mortality in males was noted for pre-PCI initiation of Impella. Additionally, both genders who received pre-PCI Impella support, experienced a significant reduction in inotrope use. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of cohorts, this study did not reveal any significant differences among gender with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS. However, initiation of Impella prior to PCI may be associated with improved mortality and morbidity in both genders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60971672019-07-01 Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group Doshi, Rajkumar Patel, Krunalkumar Decter, Dean Jauhar, Rajiv Meraj, Perwaiz Indian Heart J Original article BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic support with Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) devices is becoming a more prevalent treatment option for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There exists only limited published data regarding outcome differences between male and female patients. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze these gender differences between short-term survival and in-hospital outcomes in those undergoing PCI with CS. METHODS: Between January 2011 and July 2016, patients undergoing PCI with simultaneous use of Impella were identified. Only patients presenting with CS were included in the analysis. All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Using SAS 9.4 for propensity score matching, additional secondary outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome was comparable between males and females (39.5% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.33) in CS patients. Secondary outcomes were also comparable and included: myocardial infarction, stroke, CS, heart failure, dialysis requirement, bleeding within 72 h, blood transfusion, dysrhythmia, composite of all complications, major adverse cardiac events. Survival at 30 days was equal in both groups. A reduced mortality in males was noted for pre-PCI initiation of Impella. Additionally, both genders who received pre-PCI Impella support, experienced a significant reduction in inotrope use. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of cohorts, this study did not reveal any significant differences among gender with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS. However, initiation of Impella prior to PCI may be associated with improved mortality and morbidity in both genders. Elsevier 2018-07 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6097167/ /pubmed/30122245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Doshi, Rajkumar
Patel, Krunalkumar
Decter, Dean
Jauhar, Rajiv
Meraj, Perwaiz
Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group
title Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group
title_full Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group
title_fullStr Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group
title_full_unstemmed Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group
title_short Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group
title_sort gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: from pvad working group
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT doshirajkumar genderdisparitieswiththeuseofpercutaneousleftventricularassistdeviceinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomplicatedbycardiogenicshockfrompvadworkinggroup
AT patelkrunalkumar genderdisparitieswiththeuseofpercutaneousleftventricularassistdeviceinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomplicatedbycardiogenicshockfrompvadworkinggroup
AT decterdean genderdisparitieswiththeuseofpercutaneousleftventricularassistdeviceinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomplicatedbycardiogenicshockfrompvadworkinggroup
AT jauharrajiv genderdisparitieswiththeuseofpercutaneousleftventricularassistdeviceinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomplicatedbycardiogenicshockfrompvadworkinggroup
AT merajperwaiz genderdisparitieswiththeuseofpercutaneousleftventricularassistdeviceinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomplicatedbycardiogenicshockfrompvadworkinggroup