Cargando…

Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries

BACKGROUND: To better understand the epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we investigated the current usage of tracheostomy in patients with ARDS recruited into the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Toshikazu, Madotto, Fabiana, Pham, Tài, Nagata, Isao, Uchida, Masatoshi, Tamiya, Nanako, Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu, Bellani, Giacomo, Laffey, John G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6
_version_ 1783348262831390720
author Abe, Toshikazu
Madotto, Fabiana
Pham, Tài
Nagata, Isao
Uchida, Masatoshi
Tamiya, Nanako
Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
Bellani, Giacomo
Laffey, John G.
author_facet Abe, Toshikazu
Madotto, Fabiana
Pham, Tài
Nagata, Isao
Uchida, Masatoshi
Tamiya, Nanako
Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
Bellani, Giacomo
Laffey, John G.
author_sort Abe, Toshikazu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To better understand the epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we investigated the current usage of tracheostomy in patients with ARDS recruited into the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG-SAFE) study. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of LUNG-SAFE, an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients receiving invasive or noninvasive ventilation in 50 countries spanning 5 continents. The study was carried out over 4 weeks consecutively in the winter of 2014, and 459 ICUs participated. We evaluated the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients that received tracheostomy, in the cohort of patients that developed ARDS on day 1–2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and in a subsequent propensity-matched cohort. RESULTS: Of the 2377 patients with ARDS that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 309 (13.0%) underwent tracheostomy during their ICU stay. Patients from high-income European countries (n = 198/1263) more frequently underwent tracheostomy compared to patients from non-European high-income countries (n = 63/649) or patients from middle-income countries (n = 48/465). Only 86/309 (27.8%) underwent tracheostomy on or before day 7, while the median timing of tracheostomy was 14 (Q1–Q3, 7–21) days after onset of ARDS. In the subsample matched by propensity score, ICU and hospital stay were longer in patients with tracheostomy. While patients with tracheostomy had the highest survival probability, there was no difference in 60-day or 90-day mortality in either the patient subgroup that survived for at least 5 days in ICU, or in the propensity-matched subsample. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients that receive tracheostomy do so after the first week of critical illness. Tracheostomy may prolong patient survival but does not reduce 60-day or 90-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02010073. Registered on 12 December 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60972452018-08-20 Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries Abe, Toshikazu Madotto, Fabiana Pham, Tài Nagata, Isao Uchida, Masatoshi Tamiya, Nanako Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu Bellani, Giacomo Laffey, John G. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: To better understand the epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we investigated the current usage of tracheostomy in patients with ARDS recruited into the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG-SAFE) study. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of LUNG-SAFE, an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients receiving invasive or noninvasive ventilation in 50 countries spanning 5 continents. The study was carried out over 4 weeks consecutively in the winter of 2014, and 459 ICUs participated. We evaluated the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients that received tracheostomy, in the cohort of patients that developed ARDS on day 1–2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and in a subsequent propensity-matched cohort. RESULTS: Of the 2377 patients with ARDS that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 309 (13.0%) underwent tracheostomy during their ICU stay. Patients from high-income European countries (n = 198/1263) more frequently underwent tracheostomy compared to patients from non-European high-income countries (n = 63/649) or patients from middle-income countries (n = 48/465). Only 86/309 (27.8%) underwent tracheostomy on or before day 7, while the median timing of tracheostomy was 14 (Q1–Q3, 7–21) days after onset of ARDS. In the subsample matched by propensity score, ICU and hospital stay were longer in patients with tracheostomy. While patients with tracheostomy had the highest survival probability, there was no difference in 60-day or 90-day mortality in either the patient subgroup that survived for at least 5 days in ICU, or in the propensity-matched subsample. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients that receive tracheostomy do so after the first week of critical illness. Tracheostomy may prolong patient survival but does not reduce 60-day or 90-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02010073. Registered on 12 December 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6097245/ /pubmed/30115127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Abe, Toshikazu
Madotto, Fabiana
Pham, Tài
Nagata, Isao
Uchida, Masatoshi
Tamiya, Nanako
Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
Bellani, Giacomo
Laffey, John G.
Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries
title Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries
title_full Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries
title_fullStr Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries
title_short Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries
title_sort epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in icus across 50 countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6
work_keys_str_mv AT abetoshikazu epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT madottofabiana epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT phamtai epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT nagataisao epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT uchidamasatoshi epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT tamiyananako epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT kurahashikiyoyasu epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT bellanigiacomo epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT laffeyjohng epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries
AT epidemiologyandpatternsoftracheostomypracticeinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinicusacross50countries