Cargando…

Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Reducing the portion sizes of foods available in restaurants and cafeterias is one promising approach to reducing energy intake, but there is little evidence of its impact from randomised studies in field settings. This study aims to i. examine the feasibility and acceptability, and ii....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollands, Gareth J., Cartwright, Emma, Pilling, Mark, Pechey, Rachel, Vasiljevic, Milica, Jebb, Susan A., Marteau, Theresa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0705-1
_version_ 1783348274607947776
author Hollands, Gareth J.
Cartwright, Emma
Pilling, Mark
Pechey, Rachel
Vasiljevic, Milica
Jebb, Susan A.
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_facet Hollands, Gareth J.
Cartwright, Emma
Pilling, Mark
Pechey, Rachel
Vasiljevic, Milica
Jebb, Susan A.
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_sort Hollands, Gareth J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing the portion sizes of foods available in restaurants and cafeterias is one promising approach to reducing energy intake, but there is little evidence of its impact from randomised studies in field settings. This study aims to i. examine the feasibility and acceptability, and ii. estimate the impact on energy purchased, of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias. METHODS: Nine worksites in England were recruited to reduce by at least 10% the portion sizes of foods available in their cafeterias from targeted categories (main meals, sides, desserts, cakes). In a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial, each site was randomised to a date of implementation, staggered fortnightly, following a baseline period of four weeks. Impact on energy purchased was analysed using generalised linear mixed modelling. We also assessed feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of intervention implementation. RESULTS: Data from six of the nine randomised sites were analysed, with three sites excluded for not providing sufficient data and/or not implementing the intervention. The extent to which the intervention was implemented varied by site, with between 6 and 49% of products altered within targeted categories. Feedback following the intervention suggested it was broadly acceptable to customers and cafeteria staff. For the primary outcome of daily energy (kcal) purchased from intervention categories, there was no statistically significant change when data from all six sites were pooled: percentage change − 8.9% (95% CI: -16.7, − 0.4; p = 0.081). Each of these six sites showed reductions in energy purchased, ranging from − 15.6 to − 0.3%, which were borderline statistically significant at two sites (respective percentage changes (95% CIs): − 15.6% (− 26.7, − 2.8); − 14.0% (− 25.0, − 1.2)). Secondary outcome data are suggestive of a compensatory increase in energy purchased from food categories not targeted by the intervention, with no overall effect observed on energy purchased across all categories. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot trial suggest that reducing portion sizes could be effective in reducing energy purchased and consumed from targeted food categories, and merits investigation in a larger trial. Future studies will need to address factors that prevented optimal implementation including site dropout and application across a limited range of products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ISRCTN52923504). Registered on 20th September 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0705-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60973012018-08-20 Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial Hollands, Gareth J. Cartwright, Emma Pilling, Mark Pechey, Rachel Vasiljevic, Milica Jebb, Susan A. Marteau, Theresa M. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Reducing the portion sizes of foods available in restaurants and cafeterias is one promising approach to reducing energy intake, but there is little evidence of its impact from randomised studies in field settings. This study aims to i. examine the feasibility and acceptability, and ii. estimate the impact on energy purchased, of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias. METHODS: Nine worksites in England were recruited to reduce by at least 10% the portion sizes of foods available in their cafeterias from targeted categories (main meals, sides, desserts, cakes). In a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial, each site was randomised to a date of implementation, staggered fortnightly, following a baseline period of four weeks. Impact on energy purchased was analysed using generalised linear mixed modelling. We also assessed feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of intervention implementation. RESULTS: Data from six of the nine randomised sites were analysed, with three sites excluded for not providing sufficient data and/or not implementing the intervention. The extent to which the intervention was implemented varied by site, with between 6 and 49% of products altered within targeted categories. Feedback following the intervention suggested it was broadly acceptable to customers and cafeteria staff. For the primary outcome of daily energy (kcal) purchased from intervention categories, there was no statistically significant change when data from all six sites were pooled: percentage change − 8.9% (95% CI: -16.7, − 0.4; p = 0.081). Each of these six sites showed reductions in energy purchased, ranging from − 15.6 to − 0.3%, which were borderline statistically significant at two sites (respective percentage changes (95% CIs): − 15.6% (− 26.7, − 2.8); − 14.0% (− 25.0, − 1.2)). Secondary outcome data are suggestive of a compensatory increase in energy purchased from food categories not targeted by the intervention, with no overall effect observed on energy purchased across all categories. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot trial suggest that reducing portion sizes could be effective in reducing energy purchased and consumed from targeted food categories, and merits investigation in a larger trial. Future studies will need to address factors that prevented optimal implementation including site dropout and application across a limited range of products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ISRCTN52923504). Registered on 20th September 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0705-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6097301/ /pubmed/30115084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0705-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hollands, Gareth J.
Cartwright, Emma
Pilling, Mark
Pechey, Rachel
Vasiljevic, Milica
Jebb, Susan A.
Marteau, Theresa M.
Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
title Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
title_full Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
title_fullStr Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
title_short Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
title_sort impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0705-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hollandsgarethj impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT cartwrightemma impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT pillingmark impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT pecheyrachel impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT vasiljevicmilica impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT jebbsusana impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT marteautheresam impactofreducingportionsizesinworksitecafeteriasasteppedwedgerandomisedcontrolledpilottrial