Cargando…

Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications

BACKGROUND: Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation is a common cause of lower back and leg pain, with surgical intervention (e.g. discectomy to remove the herniated disc) recommended after an appropriate period of conservative management, however the existing or increased breach of the annulus fibros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choy, Wen Jie, Phan, Kevin, Diwan, Ashish D., Ong, Chon Sum, Mobbs, Ralph J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2213-5
_version_ 1783348278868312064
author Choy, Wen Jie
Phan, Kevin
Diwan, Ashish D.
Ong, Chon Sum
Mobbs, Ralph J.
author_facet Choy, Wen Jie
Phan, Kevin
Diwan, Ashish D.
Ong, Chon Sum
Mobbs, Ralph J.
author_sort Choy, Wen Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation is a common cause of lower back and leg pain, with surgical intervention (e.g. discectomy to remove the herniated disc) recommended after an appropriate period of conservative management, however the existing or increased breach of the annulus fibrosus persists with the potential of reherniation. Several prosthesis and techniques to reduce re-herniation have been proposed including implantation of an annular closure device (ACD) – Barricaid™ and an annular tissue repair system (AR) – Anulex-Xclose™. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assist surgeons determine a potential approach to reduce incidences of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and assess the current devices regarding their outcomes and complications. METHODS: Four electronic full-text databases were systematically searched through September 2017. Data including outcomes of annular closure device/annular repair were extracted. All results were pooled utilising meta-analysis with weighted mean difference and odds ratio as summary statistics. RESULTS: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Three studies reported the use of Barricaid (ACD) while one study reported the use of Anulex (AR). A total of 24 symptomatic reherniation were reported among 811 discectomies with ACD/AR as compared to 51 out of 645 in the control group (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20,0.56; I(2) = 0%; P < 0.0001). Durotomies were lower among the ACD/AR patients with only 3 reported cases compared to 7 in the control group (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.13, 2.23; I(2) = 11%; P = 0.39). Similar outcomes for post-operative Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale were obtained when both groups were compared. CONCLUSION: Early results showed the use of Barricaid and Anulex devices are beneficial for short term outcomes demonstrating reduction in symptomatic disc reherniation with low post-operative complication rates. Long-term studies are required to further investigate the efficacy of such devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60973192018-08-20 Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications Choy, Wen Jie Phan, Kevin Diwan, Ashish D. Ong, Chon Sum Mobbs, Ralph J. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation is a common cause of lower back and leg pain, with surgical intervention (e.g. discectomy to remove the herniated disc) recommended after an appropriate period of conservative management, however the existing or increased breach of the annulus fibrosus persists with the potential of reherniation. Several prosthesis and techniques to reduce re-herniation have been proposed including implantation of an annular closure device (ACD) – Barricaid™ and an annular tissue repair system (AR) – Anulex-Xclose™. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assist surgeons determine a potential approach to reduce incidences of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and assess the current devices regarding their outcomes and complications. METHODS: Four electronic full-text databases were systematically searched through September 2017. Data including outcomes of annular closure device/annular repair were extracted. All results were pooled utilising meta-analysis with weighted mean difference and odds ratio as summary statistics. RESULTS: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Three studies reported the use of Barricaid (ACD) while one study reported the use of Anulex (AR). A total of 24 symptomatic reherniation were reported among 811 discectomies with ACD/AR as compared to 51 out of 645 in the control group (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20,0.56; I(2) = 0%; P < 0.0001). Durotomies were lower among the ACD/AR patients with only 3 reported cases compared to 7 in the control group (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.13, 2.23; I(2) = 11%; P = 0.39). Similar outcomes for post-operative Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale were obtained when both groups were compared. CONCLUSION: Early results showed the use of Barricaid and Anulex devices are beneficial for short term outcomes demonstrating reduction in symptomatic disc reherniation with low post-operative complication rates. Long-term studies are required to further investigate the efficacy of such devices. BioMed Central 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6097319/ /pubmed/30115053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2213-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choy, Wen Jie
Phan, Kevin
Diwan, Ashish D.
Ong, Chon Sum
Mobbs, Ralph J.
Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
title Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
title_full Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
title_fullStr Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
title_full_unstemmed Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
title_short Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
title_sort annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2213-5
work_keys_str_mv AT choywenjie annularclosuredevicefordischerniationmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomeandcomplications
AT phankevin annularclosuredevicefordischerniationmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomeandcomplications
AT diwanashishd annularclosuredevicefordischerniationmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomeandcomplications
AT ongchonsum annularclosuredevicefordischerniationmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomeandcomplications
AT mobbsralphj annularclosuredevicefordischerniationmetaanalysisofclinicaloutcomeandcomplications