Cargando…

Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools

BACKGROUND: Standardized methods for assessing attachment disorders are scarce but needed for research and practice. METHODS: In the current study, several assessments for attachment disorder symptoms are used within a German sample of foster children after being exposed to neglect and maltreatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kliewer-Neumann, Josephine D., Zimmermann, Janin, Bovenschen, Ina, Gabler, Sandra, Lang, Katrin, Spangler, Gottfried, Nowacki, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0250-3
_version_ 1783348305423499264
author Kliewer-Neumann, Josephine D.
Zimmermann, Janin
Bovenschen, Ina
Gabler, Sandra
Lang, Katrin
Spangler, Gottfried
Nowacki, Katja
author_facet Kliewer-Neumann, Josephine D.
Zimmermann, Janin
Bovenschen, Ina
Gabler, Sandra
Lang, Katrin
Spangler, Gottfried
Nowacki, Katja
author_sort Kliewer-Neumann, Josephine D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardized methods for assessing attachment disorders are scarce but needed for research and practice. METHODS: In the current study, several assessments for attachment disorder symptoms are used within a German sample of foster children after being exposed to neglect and maltreatment in their biological families. The symptoms were assessed with four established assessment methods based on both parents’ report and behavioral observation: The Rating for Infant Stranger Engagement, the Stranger at the Door, the Disturbances of Attachment Interview and the Reactive Attachment Disorder Questionnaire. RESULTS: The foster care sample showed symptoms of both the inhibited and the disinhibited attachment disorder. The degree of symptoms is comparable to previous findings. The results of the different tools investigating the disinhibited type of attachment disorder are correlated to each other, but do not overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Although all approaches are based on the clinical criteria of the DSM-IV, the assessments do not coincide. Each tool provides a different point of view on the symptoms, so a multi methodical approach for assessing attachment disorder symptoms should be implemented. Furthermore, the inhibited and the disinhibited symptoms represent separate categories, as reflected in the DSM-5, requiring separate assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60974432018-08-20 Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools Kliewer-Neumann, Josephine D. Zimmermann, Janin Bovenschen, Ina Gabler, Sandra Lang, Katrin Spangler, Gottfried Nowacki, Katja Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Standardized methods for assessing attachment disorders are scarce but needed for research and practice. METHODS: In the current study, several assessments for attachment disorder symptoms are used within a German sample of foster children after being exposed to neglect and maltreatment in their biological families. The symptoms were assessed with four established assessment methods based on both parents’ report and behavioral observation: The Rating for Infant Stranger Engagement, the Stranger at the Door, the Disturbances of Attachment Interview and the Reactive Attachment Disorder Questionnaire. RESULTS: The foster care sample showed symptoms of both the inhibited and the disinhibited attachment disorder. The degree of symptoms is comparable to previous findings. The results of the different tools investigating the disinhibited type of attachment disorder are correlated to each other, but do not overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Although all approaches are based on the clinical criteria of the DSM-IV, the assessments do not coincide. Each tool provides a different point of view on the symptoms, so a multi methodical approach for assessing attachment disorder symptoms should be implemented. Furthermore, the inhibited and the disinhibited symptoms represent separate categories, as reflected in the DSM-5, requiring separate assessment. BioMed Central 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6097443/ /pubmed/30127846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0250-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kliewer-Neumann, Josephine D.
Zimmermann, Janin
Bovenschen, Ina
Gabler, Sandra
Lang, Katrin
Spangler, Gottfried
Nowacki, Katja
Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
title Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
title_full Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
title_fullStr Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
title_short Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
title_sort assessment of attachment disorder symptoms in foster children: comparing diagnostic assessment tools
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0250-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kliewerneumannjosephined assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools
AT zimmermannjanin assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools
AT bovenschenina assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools
AT gablersandra assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools
AT langkatrin assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools
AT spanglergottfried assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools
AT nowackikatja assessmentofattachmentdisordersymptomsinfosterchildrencomparingdiagnosticassessmenttools