Cargando…

Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: With the continued high prevalence of chlamydia worldwide and high risk of transfer from mothers to their infant during delivery, a need for safe and effective therapies for infants who acquire a chlamydial infection remains. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zikic, Andrew, Schünemann, Holger, Wi, Teodora, Lincetto, Ornella, Broutet, Nathalie, Santesso, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piy060
_version_ 1783348329328934912
author Zikic, Andrew
Schünemann, Holger
Wi, Teodora
Lincetto, Ornella
Broutet, Nathalie
Santesso, Nancy
author_facet Zikic, Andrew
Schünemann, Holger
Wi, Teodora
Lincetto, Ornella
Broutet, Nathalie
Santesso, Nancy
author_sort Zikic, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the continued high prevalence of chlamydia worldwide and high risk of transfer from mothers to their infant during delivery, a need for safe and effective therapies for infants who acquire a chlamydial infection remains. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic treatments, including oral erythromycin, azithromycin, and trimethoprim, for neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception to July 14, 2017. We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that evaluated the effects of erythromycin, azithromycin, or trimethoprim in neonates with chlamydial conjunctivitis. A meta-analysis using a random-effects generic inverse-variance method was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We found 12 studies (n = 292 neonates) and were able to meta-analyze 7 studies that used erythromycin at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight per day for 14 days. The clinical and microbiological cure were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94%–100%) and 97% (95% CI, 95%–99%), respectively, and adverse gastrointestinal effects occurred in 14% (95% CI, 1%–28%) of the neonates. The microbiological cure in the study that assessed azithromycin at 20 mg/kg per day were 60% (95% CI, 27%–93%) when it was given in a single dose and 86% (95% CI, 61%–100%) when given in a 3-day course. Two studies reported compliance with treatments, and 1 study reported no pyloric stenosis events. Because of the risk of bias and the few neonates included across the studies, the certainty of evidence is low to very low. No studies assessed trimethoprim. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence suggests that erythromycin at 50 mg/kg per day for 14 days results in higher numbers of cure than does azithromycin, compliance and risk of pyloric stenosis related to their use for other infections in neonates will factor into treatment recommendations. More data are needed to compare these treatments directly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60975782018-08-22 Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Zikic, Andrew Schünemann, Holger Wi, Teodora Lincetto, Ornella Broutet, Nathalie Santesso, Nancy J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Electronic Articles BACKGROUND: With the continued high prevalence of chlamydia worldwide and high risk of transfer from mothers to their infant during delivery, a need for safe and effective therapies for infants who acquire a chlamydial infection remains. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic treatments, including oral erythromycin, azithromycin, and trimethoprim, for neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception to July 14, 2017. We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that evaluated the effects of erythromycin, azithromycin, or trimethoprim in neonates with chlamydial conjunctivitis. A meta-analysis using a random-effects generic inverse-variance method was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We found 12 studies (n = 292 neonates) and were able to meta-analyze 7 studies that used erythromycin at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight per day for 14 days. The clinical and microbiological cure were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94%–100%) and 97% (95% CI, 95%–99%), respectively, and adverse gastrointestinal effects occurred in 14% (95% CI, 1%–28%) of the neonates. The microbiological cure in the study that assessed azithromycin at 20 mg/kg per day were 60% (95% CI, 27%–93%) when it was given in a single dose and 86% (95% CI, 61%–100%) when given in a 3-day course. Two studies reported compliance with treatments, and 1 study reported no pyloric stenosis events. Because of the risk of bias and the few neonates included across the studies, the certainty of evidence is low to very low. No studies assessed trimethoprim. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence suggests that erythromycin at 50 mg/kg per day for 14 days results in higher numbers of cure than does azithromycin, compliance and risk of pyloric stenosis related to their use for other infections in neonates will factor into treatment recommendations. More data are needed to compare these treatments directly. Oxford University Press 2018-08 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6097578/ /pubmed/30007329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piy060 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Electronic Articles
Zikic, Andrew
Schünemann, Holger
Wi, Teodora
Lincetto, Ornella
Broutet, Nathalie
Santesso, Nancy
Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Treatment of Neonatal Chlamydial Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort treatment of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Electronic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piy060
work_keys_str_mv AT zikicandrew treatmentofneonatalchlamydialconjunctivitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schunemannholger treatmentofneonatalchlamydialconjunctivitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT witeodora treatmentofneonatalchlamydialconjunctivitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lincettoornella treatmentofneonatalchlamydialconjunctivitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT broutetnathalie treatmentofneonatalchlamydialconjunctivitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT santessonancy treatmentofneonatalchlamydialconjunctivitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis