Cargando…

Class II HLA Genotype Association With First-Phase Insulin Response Is Explained by Islet Autoantibodies

CONTEXT: A declining first-phase insulin response (FPIR) is characteristic of the disease process leading to clinical type 1 diabetes. It is not known whether reduced FPIR depends on class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype, islet autoimmunity, or both. OBJECTIVE: To dissect the role of class...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koskinen, Maarit K, Lempainen, Johanna, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Helminen, Olli, Hekkala, Anne, Härkönen, Taina, Kiviniemi, Minna, Simell, Olli, Knip, Mikael, Ilonen, Jorma, Toppari, Jorma, Veijola, Riitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Endocrine Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02040
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: A declining first-phase insulin response (FPIR) is characteristic of the disease process leading to clinical type 1 diabetes. It is not known whether reduced FPIR depends on class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype, islet autoimmunity, or both. OBJECTIVE: To dissect the role of class II HLA DR-DQ genotypes and biochemical islet autoantibodies in the compromised FPIR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A total of 438 children with defined HLA DR-DQ genotype in the prospective Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Study were analyzed for FPIR in a total of 1149 intravenous glucose tolerance tests and were categorized by their HLA DR-DQ genotype and the number of biochemical islet autoantibodies at the time of the first FPIR. Age-adjusted hierarchical linear mixed models were used to analyze repeated measurements of FPIR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The associations between class II HLA DR-DQ genotype, islet autoantibody status, and FPIR. RESULTS: A strong association between the degree of risk conferred by HLA DR-DQ genotype and positivity for islet autoantibodies existed (P < 0.0001). FPIR was inversely associated with the number of biochemical autoantibodies (P < 0.0001) irrespective of HLA DR-DQ risk group. FPIR decreased over time in children with multiple autoantibodies and increased in children with no biochemical autoantibodies (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The class II HLA DR-DQ genotype association with FPIR was secondary to the association between HLA and islet autoimmunity. Declining FPIR was associated with positivity for multiple islet autoantibodies irrespective of class II HLA DR-DQ genotype.