Cargando…

Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis

There are many survey instruments to determine drinking patterns and alcohol consumption levels in the general population. This study aims to compare the context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) and beverage-specific quantity-frequency (BSQF) methods to estimate alcohol consumption indices at indi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vichitkunakorn, Polathep, Balthip, Karnsunaphat, Geater, Alan, Assanangkornchai, Sawitri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30118509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202756
_version_ 1783348348917383168
author Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
Balthip, Karnsunaphat
Geater, Alan
Assanangkornchai, Sawitri
author_facet Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
Balthip, Karnsunaphat
Geater, Alan
Assanangkornchai, Sawitri
author_sort Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
collection PubMed
description There are many survey instruments to determine drinking patterns and alcohol consumption levels in the general population. This study aims to compare the context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) and beverage-specific quantity-frequency (BSQF) methods to estimate alcohol consumption indices at individual and sample levels. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a population aged 15 years and older in Songkhla Province, Thailand. The BSQF and CSQF questionnaires with a 3-month retrospective time frame and in random order were applied to each participant. The CSQF was developed to ask more about the drinking contexts. The questions elicited information on location, partner, beverage, quantity, and frequency for five common drinking situations. Among 804 participants, 183 drank alcohol in the last three months. At the individual level, total alcohol consumption of almost all types of beverage by the CSQF was higher than the BSQF in approximately 50% of current drinkers and was mainly accounted for by the higher report of average quantity. At the sample level, there were no significant differences in the average daily intake, 3-month intake per drinker or per capita consumption between instruments. The interview duration and burden of answering the questions by the participants for the CSQF were not significantly higher than those for the BSQF. In summary, the fuller picture of drinking behaviors from the CSQF has several valuable methodological advantages and provides information allowing alcohol policies to be more directly specific to certain target populations or situations. The CSQF is a prototype questionnaire and forms the basis for a contextual approach. However, additional methodological studies need to be explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60976962018-08-30 Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis Vichitkunakorn, Polathep Balthip, Karnsunaphat Geater, Alan Assanangkornchai, Sawitri PLoS One Research Article There are many survey instruments to determine drinking patterns and alcohol consumption levels in the general population. This study aims to compare the context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) and beverage-specific quantity-frequency (BSQF) methods to estimate alcohol consumption indices at individual and sample levels. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a population aged 15 years and older in Songkhla Province, Thailand. The BSQF and CSQF questionnaires with a 3-month retrospective time frame and in random order were applied to each participant. The CSQF was developed to ask more about the drinking contexts. The questions elicited information on location, partner, beverage, quantity, and frequency for five common drinking situations. Among 804 participants, 183 drank alcohol in the last three months. At the individual level, total alcohol consumption of almost all types of beverage by the CSQF was higher than the BSQF in approximately 50% of current drinkers and was mainly accounted for by the higher report of average quantity. At the sample level, there were no significant differences in the average daily intake, 3-month intake per drinker or per capita consumption between instruments. The interview duration and burden of answering the questions by the participants for the CSQF were not significantly higher than those for the BSQF. In summary, the fuller picture of drinking behaviors from the CSQF has several valuable methodological advantages and provides information allowing alcohol policies to be more directly specific to certain target populations or situations. The CSQF is a prototype questionnaire and forms the basis for a contextual approach. However, additional methodological studies need to be explored. Public Library of Science 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6097696/ /pubmed/30118509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202756 Text en © 2018 Vichitkunakorn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
Balthip, Karnsunaphat
Geater, Alan
Assanangkornchai, Sawitri
Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis
title Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis
title_full Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis
title_fullStr Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis
title_short Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis
title_sort comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: individual and sample level analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30118509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202756
work_keys_str_mv AT vichitkunakornpolathep comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
AT balthipkarnsunaphat comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
AT geateralan comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis
AT assanangkornchaisawitri comparisonsbetweencontextspecificandbeveragespecificquantityfrequencyinstrumentstoassessalcoholconsumptionindicesindividualandsamplelevelanalysis