Cargando…

The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse

Environmental cues associated with rewards can acquire motivational properties. However, there is considerable variation in the extent to which a reward cue gains motivational control over behavior, depending on the individual and the form of the cue. When a discrete cue is paired with food reward,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitchers, Kyle K., Sarter, Martin, Robinson, Terry E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046995.117
_version_ 1783348362102177792
author Pitchers, Kyle K.
Sarter, Martin
Robinson, Terry E.
author_facet Pitchers, Kyle K.
Sarter, Martin
Robinson, Terry E.
author_sort Pitchers, Kyle K.
collection PubMed
description Environmental cues associated with rewards can acquire motivational properties. However, there is considerable variation in the extent to which a reward cue gains motivational control over behavior, depending on the individual and the form of the cue. When a discrete cue is paired with food reward, it acquires greater control over motivated behavior in some rats (sign-trackers, STs) than others (goal-trackers, GTs) as indicated by the propensity to approach the cue, the willingness to work to obtain it, and its ability to reinstate reward-seeking behavior. Here, we review studies that employ this ST/GT animal model to investigate characteristics of individuals that are especially susceptible to reward cue-elicited behavior and the involvement of dopamine and acetylcholine neuromodulator systems in the susceptibility to cue-induced drug relapse. First, we discuss individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to different forms of reward cues and the involvement of the mesolimbic dopamine system. We then discuss individual differences in cognitive/attentional control and the contributions of the cholinergic system in processing reward cues. It is suggested that in STs a propensity to attribute motivational properties to a drug cue is combined with poor attentional control in the face of these cues, making them particularly vulnerable to transition from casual/experimental patterns of drug use to addiction and to cue-induced relapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60977662019-09-01 The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse Pitchers, Kyle K. Sarter, Martin Robinson, Terry E. Learn Mem Review Environmental cues associated with rewards can acquire motivational properties. However, there is considerable variation in the extent to which a reward cue gains motivational control over behavior, depending on the individual and the form of the cue. When a discrete cue is paired with food reward, it acquires greater control over motivated behavior in some rats (sign-trackers, STs) than others (goal-trackers, GTs) as indicated by the propensity to approach the cue, the willingness to work to obtain it, and its ability to reinstate reward-seeking behavior. Here, we review studies that employ this ST/GT animal model to investigate characteristics of individuals that are especially susceptible to reward cue-elicited behavior and the involvement of dopamine and acetylcholine neuromodulator systems in the susceptibility to cue-induced drug relapse. First, we discuss individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to different forms of reward cues and the involvement of the mesolimbic dopamine system. We then discuss individual differences in cognitive/attentional control and the contributions of the cholinergic system in processing reward cues. It is suggested that in STs a propensity to attribute motivational properties to a drug cue is combined with poor attentional control in the face of these cues, making them particularly vulnerable to transition from casual/experimental patterns of drug use to addiction and to cue-induced relapse. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6097766/ /pubmed/30115769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046995.117 Text en © 2018 Pitchers et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Pitchers, Kyle K.
Sarter, Martin
Robinson, Terry E.
The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
title The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
title_full The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
title_fullStr The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
title_full_unstemmed The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
title_short The hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
title_sort hot ‘n’ cold of cue-induced drug relapse
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30115769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046995.117
work_keys_str_mv AT pitcherskylek thehotncoldofcueinduceddrugrelapse
AT sartermartin thehotncoldofcueinduceddrugrelapse
AT robinsonterrye thehotncoldofcueinduceddrugrelapse
AT pitcherskylek hotncoldofcueinduceddrugrelapse
AT sartermartin hotncoldofcueinduceddrugrelapse
AT robinsonterrye hotncoldofcueinduceddrugrelapse