Cargando…
Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. METHODS: A literature review of ethical risks and overs...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2 |
_version_ | 1783348366618394624 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Saksham Muskens, Ivo S. Fandino, Luis Bradley Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C. Broekman, Marike L. D. |
author_facet | Gupta, Saksham Muskens, Ivo S. Fandino, Luis Bradley Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C. Broekman, Marike L. D. |
author_sort | Gupta, Saksham |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. METHODS: A literature review of ethical risks and oversight mechanisms was conducted. RESULTS: Oversight mechanisms range from the historical concept of surgical exceptionalism to departmental, hospital, and centralized committees. These fragmentary and non-standardized oversight mechanisms leave surgeon-innovators and patients open to significant risk of breaching the ethical principles at the core of surgical practice. A systematized approach that mitigates these risks while maintaining the independence and dignity of the surgical profession is necessary. We propose an oversight framework that incorporates multiple structures tailored toward the ethical risk introduced by different forms of innovation. DISCUSSION: We summarize ethical risks and current regulatory structures, and we then use these findings to outline an oversight framework that may be applied to surgical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6097786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60977862018-08-24 Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges Gupta, Saksham Muskens, Ivo S. Fandino, Luis Bradley Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C. Broekman, Marike L. D. World J Surg Scientific Review BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. METHODS: A literature review of ethical risks and oversight mechanisms was conducted. RESULTS: Oversight mechanisms range from the historical concept of surgical exceptionalism to departmental, hospital, and centralized committees. These fragmentary and non-standardized oversight mechanisms leave surgeon-innovators and patients open to significant risk of breaching the ethical principles at the core of surgical practice. A systematized approach that mitigates these risks while maintaining the independence and dignity of the surgical profession is necessary. We propose an oversight framework that incorporates multiple structures tailored toward the ethical risk introduced by different forms of innovation. DISCUSSION: We summarize ethical risks and current regulatory structures, and we then use these findings to outline an oversight framework that may be applied to surgical practice. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6097786/ /pubmed/29536142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Review Gupta, Saksham Muskens, Ivo S. Fandino, Luis Bradley Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C. Broekman, Marike L. D. Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges |
title | Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges |
title_full | Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges |
title_fullStr | Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges |
title_short | Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges |
title_sort | oversight in surgical innovation: a response to ethical challenges |
topic | Scientific Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptasaksham oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges AT muskensivos oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges AT fandinoluisbradley oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges AT hulsbergenalexanderfc oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges AT broekmanmarikeld oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges |