Cargando…

Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges

BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. METHODS: A literature review of ethical risks and overs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Saksham, Muskens, Ivo S., Fandino, Luis Bradley, Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C., Broekman, Marike L. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2
_version_ 1783348366618394624
author Gupta, Saksham
Muskens, Ivo S.
Fandino, Luis Bradley
Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
author_facet Gupta, Saksham
Muskens, Ivo S.
Fandino, Luis Bradley
Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
author_sort Gupta, Saksham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. METHODS: A literature review of ethical risks and oversight mechanisms was conducted. RESULTS: Oversight mechanisms range from the historical concept of surgical exceptionalism to departmental, hospital, and centralized committees. These fragmentary and non-standardized oversight mechanisms leave surgeon-innovators and patients open to significant risk of breaching the ethical principles at the core of surgical practice. A systematized approach that mitigates these risks while maintaining the independence and dignity of the surgical profession is necessary. We propose an oversight framework that incorporates multiple structures tailored toward the ethical risk introduced by different forms of innovation. DISCUSSION: We summarize ethical risks and current regulatory structures, and we then use these findings to outline an oversight framework that may be applied to surgical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6097786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60977862018-08-24 Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges Gupta, Saksham Muskens, Ivo S. Fandino, Luis Bradley Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C. Broekman, Marike L. D. World J Surg Scientific Review BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. METHODS: A literature review of ethical risks and oversight mechanisms was conducted. RESULTS: Oversight mechanisms range from the historical concept of surgical exceptionalism to departmental, hospital, and centralized committees. These fragmentary and non-standardized oversight mechanisms leave surgeon-innovators and patients open to significant risk of breaching the ethical principles at the core of surgical practice. A systematized approach that mitigates these risks while maintaining the independence and dignity of the surgical profession is necessary. We propose an oversight framework that incorporates multiple structures tailored toward the ethical risk introduced by different forms of innovation. DISCUSSION: We summarize ethical risks and current regulatory structures, and we then use these findings to outline an oversight framework that may be applied to surgical practice. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6097786/ /pubmed/29536142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Scientific Review
Gupta, Saksham
Muskens, Ivo S.
Fandino, Luis Bradley
Hulsbergen, Alexander F. C.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
title Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
title_full Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
title_fullStr Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
title_short Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
title_sort oversight in surgical innovation: a response to ethical challenges
topic Scientific Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2
work_keys_str_mv AT guptasaksham oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges
AT muskensivos oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges
AT fandinoluisbradley oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges
AT hulsbergenalexanderfc oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges
AT broekmanmarikeld oversightinsurgicalinnovationaresponsetoethicalchallenges