Cargando…

Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound may be a reasonable alternative to chest radiography for the identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound for ARDS is uncertain. We therefore analyzed the clinical outcomes of ARDS diagnosed according to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: See, Kay Choong, Ong, Venetia, Tan, Yi Lin, Sahagun, Juliet, Taculod, Juvel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30119687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2105-y
_version_ 1783348505288376320
author See, Kay Choong
Ong, Venetia
Tan, Yi Lin
Sahagun, Juliet
Taculod, Juvel
author_facet See, Kay Choong
Ong, Venetia
Tan, Yi Lin
Sahagun, Juliet
Taculod, Juvel
author_sort See, Kay Choong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound may be a reasonable alternative to chest radiography for the identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound for ARDS is uncertain. We therefore analyzed the clinical outcomes of ARDS diagnosed according to the Berlin Definition, using either chest radiography (Berlin-CXR) or lung ultrasound (Berlin-LUS) as an alternative imaging method. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study in a 20-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU). Patients who required noninvasive ventilation or invasive ventilation for hypoxemic respiratory failure on ICU admission from August 2014 to March 2017 were included. Both chest radiography and lung ultrasound were performed routinely upon ICU admission. Comparisons were made using either the Berlin-CXR or Berlin-LUS definitions to diagnose ARDS with respect to the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for each definition. ICU and hospital mortality were the main outcome measures for both definitions. RESULTS: The first admissions of 456 distinct patients were analyzed. Compared with the 216 patients who met the Berlin-CXR definition (ICU mortality 19.4%, hospital mortality 36.1%), 229 patients who met the Berlin-LUS definition (ICU mortality 22.7%, hospital mortality 34.5%) and 79 patients who met the Berlin-LUS but not the Berlin-CXR definition (ICU mortality 21.5%, hospital mortality 29.1%) had similar outcomes. In contrast, the 295 patients who met either definition had higher mortality than the 161 patients who did not meet either definition (ICU mortality 20.0% versus 12.4%, P = 0.041; hospital mortality 34.2% versus 24.2%, P = 0.027). Compared with Berlin-CXR, Berlin-LUS had a positive predictive value of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.59–0.72) and a negative predictive value of 0.71 (0.65–0.77). Among the 216 Berlin-CXR ARDS patients, 150 patients (69.4%) also fulfilled Berlin-LUS definition. CONCLUSIONS: For the identification of ARDS using the Berlin definition, both chest radiography and lung ultrasound were equally related to mortality. The Berlin definition using lung ultrasound helped identify patients at higher risk of death, even if these patients did not fulfill the conventional Berlin definition using chest radiography. However, the moderate overlap of patients when chest imaging modalities differed suggests that chest radiography and lung ultrasound should be complementary rather than used interchangeably. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2105-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60985812018-08-23 Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study See, Kay Choong Ong, Venetia Tan, Yi Lin Sahagun, Juliet Taculod, Juvel Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound may be a reasonable alternative to chest radiography for the identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound for ARDS is uncertain. We therefore analyzed the clinical outcomes of ARDS diagnosed according to the Berlin Definition, using either chest radiography (Berlin-CXR) or lung ultrasound (Berlin-LUS) as an alternative imaging method. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study in a 20-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU). Patients who required noninvasive ventilation or invasive ventilation for hypoxemic respiratory failure on ICU admission from August 2014 to March 2017 were included. Both chest radiography and lung ultrasound were performed routinely upon ICU admission. Comparisons were made using either the Berlin-CXR or Berlin-LUS definitions to diagnose ARDS with respect to the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for each definition. ICU and hospital mortality were the main outcome measures for both definitions. RESULTS: The first admissions of 456 distinct patients were analyzed. Compared with the 216 patients who met the Berlin-CXR definition (ICU mortality 19.4%, hospital mortality 36.1%), 229 patients who met the Berlin-LUS definition (ICU mortality 22.7%, hospital mortality 34.5%) and 79 patients who met the Berlin-LUS but not the Berlin-CXR definition (ICU mortality 21.5%, hospital mortality 29.1%) had similar outcomes. In contrast, the 295 patients who met either definition had higher mortality than the 161 patients who did not meet either definition (ICU mortality 20.0% versus 12.4%, P = 0.041; hospital mortality 34.2% versus 24.2%, P = 0.027). Compared with Berlin-CXR, Berlin-LUS had a positive predictive value of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.59–0.72) and a negative predictive value of 0.71 (0.65–0.77). Among the 216 Berlin-CXR ARDS patients, 150 patients (69.4%) also fulfilled Berlin-LUS definition. CONCLUSIONS: For the identification of ARDS using the Berlin definition, both chest radiography and lung ultrasound were equally related to mortality. The Berlin definition using lung ultrasound helped identify patients at higher risk of death, even if these patients did not fulfill the conventional Berlin definition using chest radiography. However, the moderate overlap of patients when chest imaging modalities differed suggests that chest radiography and lung ultrasound should be complementary rather than used interchangeably. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2105-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6098581/ /pubmed/30119687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2105-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
See, Kay Choong
Ong, Venetia
Tan, Yi Lin
Sahagun, Juliet
Taculod, Juvel
Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
title Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
title_full Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
title_short Chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
title_sort chest radiography versus lung ultrasound for identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30119687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2105-y
work_keys_str_mv AT seekaychoong chestradiographyversuslungultrasoundforidentificationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ongvenetia chestradiographyversuslungultrasoundforidentificationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT tanyilin chestradiographyversuslungultrasoundforidentificationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sahagunjuliet chestradiographyversuslungultrasoundforidentificationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT taculodjuvel chestradiographyversuslungultrasoundforidentificationofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearetrospectiveobservationalstudy