Cargando…

Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis and prognosis of lymphoma based on PET-CT. MATERIAL/METHODS: Our study included 88 superficial lymph nodes and 63 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy or surgery for pathology from Oct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Xiaoyan, Jiang, Wenbin, Zhang, Xiaojuan, Ding, Zhaoyan, Xue, Hongwei, Wang, Zhenguang, Zhao, Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30095086
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908849
_version_ 1783348526333296640
author Niu, Xiaoyan
Jiang, Wenbin
Zhang, Xiaojuan
Ding, Zhaoyan
Xue, Hongwei
Wang, Zhenguang
Zhao, Cheng
author_facet Niu, Xiaoyan
Jiang, Wenbin
Zhang, Xiaojuan
Ding, Zhaoyan
Xue, Hongwei
Wang, Zhenguang
Zhao, Cheng
author_sort Niu, Xiaoyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis and prognosis of lymphoma based on PET-CT. MATERIAL/METHODS: Our study included 88 superficial lymph nodes and 63 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy or surgery for pathology from October 2015 to March 2017. All lymph nodes were assessed by CEUS and PET-CT. CEUS and PET-CT parameters were recorded, including arrive time (AT), time to peak (TTP), base intensity (BI), peak intensity (PI), ascending slope (AS), descending slope (DS), area under the TIC curve (AUC), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean). Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the associations of CEUS and PET-CT parameters. RESULTS: Of the 88 lymph nodes examined,12 were Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and76 were non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). The variations of CEUS dose parameters (ΔI, AUC, and AS) were positively correlated with PET-CT results (SUVmax and TLG). Correlation coefficients were 0.609, 0.518, 0.456, 0.630, 0.593, and 0. 532, respectively. The remaining time values (AT, TP, and ΔT) were negatively associated with PET-CT results. Correlation coefficients were −0.239, −0.272, −0.284and −0.377, −0.391, and −0.320, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative CEUS data were correlated with PET-CT values, with potential use in the diagnosis of lymphoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60986692018-08-20 Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma Niu, Xiaoyan Jiang, Wenbin Zhang, Xiaojuan Ding, Zhaoyan Xue, Hongwei Wang, Zhenguang Zhao, Cheng Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis and prognosis of lymphoma based on PET-CT. MATERIAL/METHODS: Our study included 88 superficial lymph nodes and 63 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy or surgery for pathology from October 2015 to March 2017. All lymph nodes were assessed by CEUS and PET-CT. CEUS and PET-CT parameters were recorded, including arrive time (AT), time to peak (TTP), base intensity (BI), peak intensity (PI), ascending slope (AS), descending slope (DS), area under the TIC curve (AUC), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean). Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the associations of CEUS and PET-CT parameters. RESULTS: Of the 88 lymph nodes examined,12 were Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and76 were non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). The variations of CEUS dose parameters (ΔI, AUC, and AS) were positively correlated with PET-CT results (SUVmax and TLG). Correlation coefficients were 0.609, 0.518, 0.456, 0.630, 0.593, and 0. 532, respectively. The remaining time values (AT, TP, and ΔT) were negatively associated with PET-CT results. Correlation coefficients were −0.239, −0.272, −0.284and −0.377, −0.391, and −0.320, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative CEUS data were correlated with PET-CT values, with potential use in the diagnosis of lymphoma. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6098669/ /pubmed/30095086 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908849 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Niu, Xiaoyan
Jiang, Wenbin
Zhang, Xiaojuan
Ding, Zhaoyan
Xue, Hongwei
Wang, Zhenguang
Zhao, Cheng
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma
title Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma
title_full Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma
title_fullStr Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma
title_short Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Lymphoma
title_sort comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (pet/ct) in lymphoma
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30095086
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908849
work_keys_str_mv AT niuxiaoyan comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma
AT jiangwenbin comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma
AT zhangxiaojuan comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma
AT dingzhaoyan comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma
AT xuehongwei comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma
AT wangzhenguang comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma
AT zhaocheng comparisonofcontrastenhancedultrasoundandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographypetctinlymphoma