Cargando…
Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
Introduction: Biomarkers such as α-defensin demonstrated to be a potentially useful option in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Recently, a new point-of-care test for α-defensin level detection in synovial fluid has been commercialized in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128266 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401 |
_version_ | 1783348536462540800 |
---|---|
author | Riccio, Giovanni Cavagnaro, Luca Akkouche, Wassim Carrega, Giuliana Felli, Lamberto Burastero, Giorgio |
author_facet | Riccio, Giovanni Cavagnaro, Luca Akkouche, Wassim Carrega, Giuliana Felli, Lamberto Burastero, Giorgio |
author_sort | Riccio, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Biomarkers such as α-defensin demonstrated to be a potentially useful option in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Recently, a new point-of-care test for α-defensin level detection in synovial fluid has been commercialized in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the α-defensin test (Synovasure(TM)) diagnostic ability with the main available clinical tests for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in a practical clinical setting of a Bone Infection Unit. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, 146 patients with suspected chronic PJI were screened with Synovasure(TM). Seventy-three of these met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and were included in the analysis. According to MSIS criteria, 40 patients (54.7%) were classified as infected and 33 (45.3%) as not infected. The results obtained with Synovasure(TM) were recorded and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI diagnosis. Results: Synovasure(TM) showed a sensitivity of 85.0 % (95% CI 70.2 to 94.3) and a specificity of 96.9 % (95% CI 83.8 to 99.9) for PJI detection. The positive likelihood ratio of Synovasure(TM) was 27.2 (95% CI 3.9 to 188.1) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). The diagnostic odds ratio was 181.3 (95% CI 20.7 to 1590.4). Synovasure(TM) demonstrated a statistical significant difference when compared to Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) specificity (at least one positive test) and preoperative culture sensitivity (1 positive culture). Conclusion: Our findings show that Synovasure(TM) sensitivity is lower than quantitative α-D test, but when compared to the main available tests shows a good specificity and the highest DOR. On the SF it is the easier test to do, due to the fact that it needs a minimal amount of SF and it is not limited by blood contamination or antibiotic use. Whereas there is no single standalone test, Synovasure(TM) should be considered a reliable additional test for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in everyday clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6098818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60988182018-08-20 Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? Riccio, Giovanni Cavagnaro, Luca Akkouche, Wassim Carrega, Giuliana Felli, Lamberto Burastero, Giorgio J Bone Jt Infect Research Paper Introduction: Biomarkers such as α-defensin demonstrated to be a potentially useful option in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Recently, a new point-of-care test for α-defensin level detection in synovial fluid has been commercialized in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the α-defensin test (Synovasure(TM)) diagnostic ability with the main available clinical tests for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in a practical clinical setting of a Bone Infection Unit. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, 146 patients with suspected chronic PJI were screened with Synovasure(TM). Seventy-three of these met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and were included in the analysis. According to MSIS criteria, 40 patients (54.7%) were classified as infected and 33 (45.3%) as not infected. The results obtained with Synovasure(TM) were recorded and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI diagnosis. Results: Synovasure(TM) showed a sensitivity of 85.0 % (95% CI 70.2 to 94.3) and a specificity of 96.9 % (95% CI 83.8 to 99.9) for PJI detection. The positive likelihood ratio of Synovasure(TM) was 27.2 (95% CI 3.9 to 188.1) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). The diagnostic odds ratio was 181.3 (95% CI 20.7 to 1590.4). Synovasure(TM) demonstrated a statistical significant difference when compared to Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) specificity (at least one positive test) and preoperative culture sensitivity (1 positive culture). Conclusion: Our findings show that Synovasure(TM) sensitivity is lower than quantitative α-D test, but when compared to the main available tests shows a good specificity and the highest DOR. On the SF it is the easier test to do, due to the fact that it needs a minimal amount of SF and it is not limited by blood contamination or antibiotic use. Whereas there is no single standalone test, Synovasure(TM) should be considered a reliable additional test for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in everyday clinical practice. Ivyspring International Publisher 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6098818/ /pubmed/30128266 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Riccio, Giovanni Cavagnaro, Luca Akkouche, Wassim Carrega, Giuliana Felli, Lamberto Burastero, Giorgio Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? |
title | Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? |
title_full | Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? |
title_fullStr | Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? |
title_short | Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? |
title_sort | qualitative alpha-defensin versus the main available tests for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: best predictor test? |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128266 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricciogiovanni qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest AT cavagnaroluca qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest AT akkouchewassim qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest AT carregagiuliana qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest AT fellilamberto qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest AT burasterogiorgio qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest |