Cargando…

Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?

Introduction: Biomarkers such as α-defensin demonstrated to be a potentially useful option in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Recently, a new point-of-care test for α-defensin level detection in synovial fluid has been commercialized in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riccio, Giovanni, Cavagnaro, Luca, Akkouche, Wassim, Carrega, Giuliana, Felli, Lamberto, Burastero, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128266
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401
_version_ 1783348536462540800
author Riccio, Giovanni
Cavagnaro, Luca
Akkouche, Wassim
Carrega, Giuliana
Felli, Lamberto
Burastero, Giorgio
author_facet Riccio, Giovanni
Cavagnaro, Luca
Akkouche, Wassim
Carrega, Giuliana
Felli, Lamberto
Burastero, Giorgio
author_sort Riccio, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Biomarkers such as α-defensin demonstrated to be a potentially useful option in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Recently, a new point-of-care test for α-defensin level detection in synovial fluid has been commercialized in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the α-defensin test (Synovasure(TM)) diagnostic ability with the main available clinical tests for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in a practical clinical setting of a Bone Infection Unit. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, 146 patients with suspected chronic PJI were screened with Synovasure(TM). Seventy-three of these met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and were included in the analysis. According to MSIS criteria, 40 patients (54.7%) were classified as infected and 33 (45.3%) as not infected. The results obtained with Synovasure(TM) were recorded and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI diagnosis. Results: Synovasure(TM) showed a sensitivity of 85.0 % (95% CI 70.2 to 94.3) and a specificity of 96.9 % (95% CI 83.8 to 99.9) for PJI detection. The positive likelihood ratio of Synovasure(TM) was 27.2 (95% CI 3.9 to 188.1) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). The diagnostic odds ratio was 181.3 (95% CI 20.7 to 1590.4). Synovasure(TM) demonstrated a statistical significant difference when compared to Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) specificity (at least one positive test) and preoperative culture sensitivity (1 positive culture). Conclusion: Our findings show that Synovasure(TM) sensitivity is lower than quantitative α-D test, but when compared to the main available tests shows a good specificity and the highest DOR. On the SF it is the easier test to do, due to the fact that it needs a minimal amount of SF and it is not limited by blood contamination or antibiotic use. Whereas there is no single standalone test, Synovasure(TM) should be considered a reliable additional test for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in everyday clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60988182018-08-20 Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test? Riccio, Giovanni Cavagnaro, Luca Akkouche, Wassim Carrega, Giuliana Felli, Lamberto Burastero, Giorgio J Bone Jt Infect Research Paper Introduction: Biomarkers such as α-defensin demonstrated to be a potentially useful option in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Recently, a new point-of-care test for α-defensin level detection in synovial fluid has been commercialized in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the α-defensin test (Synovasure(TM)) diagnostic ability with the main available clinical tests for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in a practical clinical setting of a Bone Infection Unit. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, 146 patients with suspected chronic PJI were screened with Synovasure(TM). Seventy-three of these met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and were included in the analysis. According to MSIS criteria, 40 patients (54.7%) were classified as infected and 33 (45.3%) as not infected. The results obtained with Synovasure(TM) were recorded and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI diagnosis. Results: Synovasure(TM) showed a sensitivity of 85.0 % (95% CI 70.2 to 94.3) and a specificity of 96.9 % (95% CI 83.8 to 99.9) for PJI detection. The positive likelihood ratio of Synovasure(TM) was 27.2 (95% CI 3.9 to 188.1) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). The diagnostic odds ratio was 181.3 (95% CI 20.7 to 1590.4). Synovasure(TM) demonstrated a statistical significant difference when compared to Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) specificity (at least one positive test) and preoperative culture sensitivity (1 positive culture). Conclusion: Our findings show that Synovasure(TM) sensitivity is lower than quantitative α-D test, but when compared to the main available tests shows a good specificity and the highest DOR. On the SF it is the easier test to do, due to the fact that it needs a minimal amount of SF and it is not limited by blood contamination or antibiotic use. Whereas there is no single standalone test, Synovasure(TM) should be considered a reliable additional test for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis in everyday clinical practice. Ivyspring International Publisher 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6098818/ /pubmed/30128266 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Riccio, Giovanni
Cavagnaro, Luca
Akkouche, Wassim
Carrega, Giuliana
Felli, Lamberto
Burastero, Giorgio
Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
title Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
title_full Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
title_fullStr Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
title_short Qualitative Alpha-defensin Versus The Main Available Tests For The Diagnosis Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Best Predictor Test?
title_sort qualitative alpha-defensin versus the main available tests for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: best predictor test?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128266
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401
work_keys_str_mv AT ricciogiovanni qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest
AT cavagnaroluca qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest
AT akkouchewassim qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest
AT carregagiuliana qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest
AT fellilamberto qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest
AT burasterogiorgio qualitativealphadefensinversusthemainavailabletestsforthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionbestpredictortest