Cargando…

Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The impact of Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) based on the non-invasive Pleth Variability Index (PVI) on clinical outcome after abdominal surgery has only sparingly been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intraoperative GDFT guided by PVI to a control gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahlmann, Hans, Hahn, Robert G., Nilsson, Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0579-4
_version_ 1783348536920768512
author Bahlmann, Hans
Hahn, Robert G.
Nilsson, Lena
author_facet Bahlmann, Hans
Hahn, Robert G.
Nilsson, Lena
author_sort Bahlmann, Hans
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) based on the non-invasive Pleth Variability Index (PVI) on clinical outcome after abdominal surgery has only sparingly been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intraoperative GDFT guided by PVI to a control group using esophageal Doppler on the incidence of complications and length of hospital stay after major abdominal surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between the groups. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial in a Swedish university hospital between November 2011 and January 2015; 150 patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery lasting 2 h or more were included. Exclusion criteria included hepatic resection or severe cardiac arrhythmia. The patients were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group received intraoperative GDFT by administering fluid boluses of 3 ml/kg tetrastarch aiming at a PVI value below 10%, while GDFT in the control group aimed for optimization of stroke volume as assessed with esophageal Doppler. Blinded observers assessed complications until postoperative day 30 using pre-defined definitions, as well as length of hospital stay. RESULTS: One hundred and-fifty patients were randomized and 146 patients were available for the final data analysis. Median duration of surgery was 3 h. A total of 64 complications occurred in the PVI group (N = 74) and 70 in the Doppler group (N = 72) (p = 0.93). Median (IQR) length of stay was 8.0 (8.0) days in the PVI group and 8.0 (9.5) in the Doppler group (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in clinical outcome, as defined by number of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay, was found when goal directed fluid therapy was applied using PVI as an alternative to esophageal Doppler. PVI appears to be an acceptable alternative to esophageal Doppler for goal directed fluid therapy during major open abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01458678. Date of first registration October 20, 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0579-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60988212018-08-23 Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial Bahlmann, Hans Hahn, Robert G. Nilsson, Lena BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) based on the non-invasive Pleth Variability Index (PVI) on clinical outcome after abdominal surgery has only sparingly been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intraoperative GDFT guided by PVI to a control group using esophageal Doppler on the incidence of complications and length of hospital stay after major abdominal surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between the groups. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial in a Swedish university hospital between November 2011 and January 2015; 150 patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery lasting 2 h or more were included. Exclusion criteria included hepatic resection or severe cardiac arrhythmia. The patients were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group received intraoperative GDFT by administering fluid boluses of 3 ml/kg tetrastarch aiming at a PVI value below 10%, while GDFT in the control group aimed for optimization of stroke volume as assessed with esophageal Doppler. Blinded observers assessed complications until postoperative day 30 using pre-defined definitions, as well as length of hospital stay. RESULTS: One hundred and-fifty patients were randomized and 146 patients were available for the final data analysis. Median duration of surgery was 3 h. A total of 64 complications occurred in the PVI group (N = 74) and 70 in the Doppler group (N = 72) (p = 0.93). Median (IQR) length of stay was 8.0 (8.0) days in the PVI group and 8.0 (9.5) in the Doppler group (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in clinical outcome, as defined by number of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay, was found when goal directed fluid therapy was applied using PVI as an alternative to esophageal Doppler. PVI appears to be an acceptable alternative to esophageal Doppler for goal directed fluid therapy during major open abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01458678. Date of first registration October 20, 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0579-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6098821/ /pubmed/30121072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0579-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bahlmann, Hans
Hahn, Robert G.
Nilsson, Lena
Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0579-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bahlmannhans plethvariabilityindexorstrokevolumeoptimizationduringopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hahnrobertg plethvariabilityindexorstrokevolumeoptimizationduringopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nilssonlena plethvariabilityindexorstrokevolumeoptimizationduringopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial