Cargando…

Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly population and are expected to increase due to the aging population. Surgical fixation with locking plate technology has increased over the last decade despite a lack of proven superiority in the literature. Thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Lisa, Berdusco, Randa, Momoli, Franco, Pollock, J., Liew, Allan, Papp, Steve, Lalonde, Karl-Andre, Gofton, Wade, Ruggiero, Sara, Lapner, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2223-3
_version_ 1783348539042037760
author Howard, Lisa
Berdusco, Randa
Momoli, Franco
Pollock, J.
Liew, Allan
Papp, Steve
Lalonde, Karl-Andre
Gofton, Wade
Ruggiero, Sara
Lapner, Peter
author_facet Howard, Lisa
Berdusco, Randa
Momoli, Franco
Pollock, J.
Liew, Allan
Papp, Steve
Lalonde, Karl-Andre
Gofton, Wade
Ruggiero, Sara
Lapner, Peter
author_sort Howard, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly population and are expected to increase due to the aging population. Surgical fixation with locking plate technology has increased over the last decade despite a lack of proven superiority in the literature. Three previous randomized controlled trials have not shown a difference in patient-centered outcomes when comparing non-operative treatment with open reduction and internal fixation. Low patient enrollment and other methodological concerns however limit the generalizability of these conclusions and as a result, management of these fractures remains a controversy. By comparing the functional outcomes of locked plate surgical fixation versus non-operative treatment of displaced three and four-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population with a large scale, prospective, multi-centered randomized controlled trial, the optimal management strategy for this common injury may be determined. METHODS: We will conduct a prospective, single blind randomized controlled parallel arm trial to compare non-operative management of proximal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation using locked plating technology. One-hundred and sixty patients > age 60 with acute 3- or 4- part proximal humerus fractures will be randomized to either open reduction and internal fixation with locked plating technology or non-operative management treatment arms. The primary outcome measure is the Constant Score at 24 months post-operative. Secondary outcome measures include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s Score (ASES), EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L Health Questionnaire Score, short form PROMIS upper extremity score and IPAQ for the elderly score. Further outcome measures include assessment of the initial classification, displacement and angulation and the quality of surgical reduction via a standard computed tomography (CT) scan; rates of non-union, malunion, arthrosis, osteopenia or other complications including infection, nerve injury, intra-articular screw penetration, reoperation rates and hospital re-admission rates. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide Level 1 evidence to guide decision-making in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02362100. Registered 5 Feb 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60988302018-08-23 Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol Howard, Lisa Berdusco, Randa Momoli, Franco Pollock, J. Liew, Allan Papp, Steve Lalonde, Karl-Andre Gofton, Wade Ruggiero, Sara Lapner, Peter BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly population and are expected to increase due to the aging population. Surgical fixation with locking plate technology has increased over the last decade despite a lack of proven superiority in the literature. Three previous randomized controlled trials have not shown a difference in patient-centered outcomes when comparing non-operative treatment with open reduction and internal fixation. Low patient enrollment and other methodological concerns however limit the generalizability of these conclusions and as a result, management of these fractures remains a controversy. By comparing the functional outcomes of locked plate surgical fixation versus non-operative treatment of displaced three and four-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population with a large scale, prospective, multi-centered randomized controlled trial, the optimal management strategy for this common injury may be determined. METHODS: We will conduct a prospective, single blind randomized controlled parallel arm trial to compare non-operative management of proximal humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation using locked plating technology. One-hundred and sixty patients > age 60 with acute 3- or 4- part proximal humerus fractures will be randomized to either open reduction and internal fixation with locked plating technology or non-operative management treatment arms. The primary outcome measure is the Constant Score at 24 months post-operative. Secondary outcome measures include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s Score (ASES), EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L Health Questionnaire Score, short form PROMIS upper extremity score and IPAQ for the elderly score. Further outcome measures include assessment of the initial classification, displacement and angulation and the quality of surgical reduction via a standard computed tomography (CT) scan; rates of non-union, malunion, arthrosis, osteopenia or other complications including infection, nerve injury, intra-articular screw penetration, reoperation rates and hospital re-admission rates. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide Level 1 evidence to guide decision-making in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02362100. Registered 5 Feb 2015. BioMed Central 2018-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6098830/ /pubmed/30121091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2223-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Howard, Lisa
Berdusco, Randa
Momoli, Franco
Pollock, J.
Liew, Allan
Papp, Steve
Lalonde, Karl-Andre
Gofton, Wade
Ruggiero, Sara
Lapner, Peter
Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
title Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
title_full Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
title_fullStr Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
title_short Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
title_sort open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2223-3
work_keys_str_mv AT howardlisa openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT berduscoranda openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT momolifranco openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT pollockj openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT liewallan openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT pappsteve openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT lalondekarlandre openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT goftonwade openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT ruggierosara openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT lapnerpeter openreductioninternalfixationvsnonoperativemanagementinproximalhumerusfracturesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol