Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal functional improvement by means of visual acuity and retinal sensibility examination after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients affected by cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients affected by retinal v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donati, Simone, Gandolfi, Carlo, Caprani, Simona Maria, Cattaneo, Jennifer, Premoli, Laura, Azzolini, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3095961
_version_ 1783348550558547968
author Donati, Simone
Gandolfi, Carlo
Caprani, Simona Maria
Cattaneo, Jennifer
Premoli, Laura
Azzolini, Claudio
author_facet Donati, Simone
Gandolfi, Carlo
Caprani, Simona Maria
Cattaneo, Jennifer
Premoli, Laura
Azzolini, Claudio
author_sort Donati, Simone
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal functional improvement by means of visual acuity and retinal sensibility examination after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients affected by cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients affected by retinal vein occlusion complicated by cystoid macular edema were enrolled in this prospective interventional study. All patients underwent a baseline complete ophthalmological evaluation as well as retinal angiography, OCT examination, and microperimetry evaluation. Each patient was treated with intravitreal injection of a long-term steroid implant (Ozurdex, Allergan). Follow-up evaluations were performed at months 1, 3, and 6 and completed by OCT and MP1 examination. Clinical data underwent statistical analysis. RESULTS: Baseline functional evaluation showed mean visual acuity of 0,63±0,42 LogMAR and retinal sensitivity of 7,93±4,73 dB (mean±standard deviation); after treatment, at day 30 we found, respectively, 0,43±0,38 LogMAR (p<0.05, compared to baseline) and 10,15±4,410 dB (p<0.05); at day 90, we found 0,44±0,32 (p<0.05) and 9.61±4,29 dB (p<0.05); at day 180, we found 0,41±0,31 (p<0.05) and 9,95±3,79 dB (p<0.05). Fixation pattern improved significantly (p<0.05), showing a stable fixation in 30% of patients at baseline, increasing to 77% of patients at day 180. Baseline morphological evaluation showed a central retinal thickness (CRT) of 398,21±181,65 μm after treatment; we found a CRT of 222,64±95,21 μm at day 30 (p<0.05, compared to baseline), 307,50±120,25 μm (p<0.05) at day 90, and 294,93±135,86 μm (p<0.05) at day 180. About 15,3% patients showed already at month 3 a recurrence of macular edema. They underwent a retreatment before month 6 as for treatment guidelines. CONCLUSION: Our detailed analysis showed the significative increase in retinal function in the early phases of the follow-up. Retinal sensibility showed a stronger correlation than VA in macular edema reabsorption, better underlying the progressive functional recovery and increase in quality of vision and life for the patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03559491.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60988812018-09-02 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion Donati, Simone Gandolfi, Carlo Caprani, Simona Maria Cattaneo, Jennifer Premoli, Laura Azzolini, Claudio Biomed Res Int Clinical Study PURPOSE: To evaluate retinal functional improvement by means of visual acuity and retinal sensibility examination after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients affected by cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients affected by retinal vein occlusion complicated by cystoid macular edema were enrolled in this prospective interventional study. All patients underwent a baseline complete ophthalmological evaluation as well as retinal angiography, OCT examination, and microperimetry evaluation. Each patient was treated with intravitreal injection of a long-term steroid implant (Ozurdex, Allergan). Follow-up evaluations were performed at months 1, 3, and 6 and completed by OCT and MP1 examination. Clinical data underwent statistical analysis. RESULTS: Baseline functional evaluation showed mean visual acuity of 0,63±0,42 LogMAR and retinal sensitivity of 7,93±4,73 dB (mean±standard deviation); after treatment, at day 30 we found, respectively, 0,43±0,38 LogMAR (p<0.05, compared to baseline) and 10,15±4,410 dB (p<0.05); at day 90, we found 0,44±0,32 (p<0.05) and 9.61±4,29 dB (p<0.05); at day 180, we found 0,41±0,31 (p<0.05) and 9,95±3,79 dB (p<0.05). Fixation pattern improved significantly (p<0.05), showing a stable fixation in 30% of patients at baseline, increasing to 77% of patients at day 180. Baseline morphological evaluation showed a central retinal thickness (CRT) of 398,21±181,65 μm after treatment; we found a CRT of 222,64±95,21 μm at day 30 (p<0.05, compared to baseline), 307,50±120,25 μm (p<0.05) at day 90, and 294,93±135,86 μm (p<0.05) at day 180. About 15,3% patients showed already at month 3 a recurrence of macular edema. They underwent a retreatment before month 6 as for treatment guidelines. CONCLUSION: Our detailed analysis showed the significative increase in retinal function in the early phases of the follow-up. Retinal sensibility showed a stronger correlation than VA in macular edema reabsorption, better underlying the progressive functional recovery and increase in quality of vision and life for the patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03559491. Hindawi 2018-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6098881/ /pubmed/30175123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3095961 Text en Copyright © 2018 Simone Donati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Donati, Simone
Gandolfi, Carlo
Caprani, Simona Maria
Cattaneo, Jennifer
Premoli, Laura
Azzolini, Claudio
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_full Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_short Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implant in cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3095961
work_keys_str_mv AT donatisimone evaluationoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentwithdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantincystoidmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT gandolficarlo evaluationoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentwithdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantincystoidmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT capranisimonamaria evaluationoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentwithdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantincystoidmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT cattaneojennifer evaluationoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentwithdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantincystoidmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT premolilaura evaluationoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentwithdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantincystoidmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT azzoliniclaudio evaluationoftheeffectivenessoftreatmentwithdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantincystoidmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion