Cargando…
Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality
BACKGROUND: Utilization of visual referential cues by non-human primates is a subject of constant scientific interest. However, only few primate species, mostly great apes, have been studied thoroughly in that regard, rendering the understanding of phylogenetic influences on the underlying cognitive...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128182 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5348 |
_version_ | 1783348563899580416 |
---|---|
author | Caspar, Kai R. Mader, Larissa Pallasdies, Fabian Lindenmeier, Miriam Begall, Sabine |
author_facet | Caspar, Kai R. Mader, Larissa Pallasdies, Fabian Lindenmeier, Miriam Begall, Sabine |
author_sort | Caspar, Kai R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Utilization of visual referential cues by non-human primates is a subject of constant scientific interest. However, only few primate species, mostly great apes, have been studied thoroughly in that regard, rendering the understanding of phylogenetic influences on the underlying cognitive patterns difficult. METHODS: We tested six species of captive gibbons in an object-choice task (n = 11) for their ability to interpret two different pointing gestures, a combination of body orientation and gaze direction as well as glancing as referential cues. Hand preferences were tested in the object-choice task and in a bimanual tube task (n = 18). RESULTS: We found positive responses to all signals except for the glancing cue at the individual as well as at the group level. The gibbons’ success rates partially exceed results reported for great apes in comparable tests and appear to be similarly influenced by prior exposure to human communicative cues. Hand preferences exhibited by the gibbons in the object-choice task as well as in a bimanual tube task suggest that crested gibbons (Nomascus sp.) are strongly lateralized at individual but not at population level for tasks involving object manipulation. DISCUSSION: Based on the available data, it can be assumed that the cognitive foundations to utilize different visual cues essential to human communication are conserved in extant hominoids and can be traced back at least to the common ancestor of great and lesser apes. However, future studies have to further investigate how the social environment of gibbons influences their ability to exploit referential signals. Gibbons’ manual laterality patterns appear to differ in several aspects from the situation found in great apes. While not extensive enough to allow for general conclusions about the evolution of hand preferences in gibbons or apes in general, our results add to the expanding knowledge on manual lateralization in the Hylobatidae. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6098942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60989422018-08-20 Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality Caspar, Kai R. Mader, Larissa Pallasdies, Fabian Lindenmeier, Miriam Begall, Sabine PeerJ Animal Behavior BACKGROUND: Utilization of visual referential cues by non-human primates is a subject of constant scientific interest. However, only few primate species, mostly great apes, have been studied thoroughly in that regard, rendering the understanding of phylogenetic influences on the underlying cognitive patterns difficult. METHODS: We tested six species of captive gibbons in an object-choice task (n = 11) for their ability to interpret two different pointing gestures, a combination of body orientation and gaze direction as well as glancing as referential cues. Hand preferences were tested in the object-choice task and in a bimanual tube task (n = 18). RESULTS: We found positive responses to all signals except for the glancing cue at the individual as well as at the group level. The gibbons’ success rates partially exceed results reported for great apes in comparable tests and appear to be similarly influenced by prior exposure to human communicative cues. Hand preferences exhibited by the gibbons in the object-choice task as well as in a bimanual tube task suggest that crested gibbons (Nomascus sp.) are strongly lateralized at individual but not at population level for tasks involving object manipulation. DISCUSSION: Based on the available data, it can be assumed that the cognitive foundations to utilize different visual cues essential to human communication are conserved in extant hominoids and can be traced back at least to the common ancestor of great and lesser apes. However, future studies have to further investigate how the social environment of gibbons influences their ability to exploit referential signals. Gibbons’ manual laterality patterns appear to differ in several aspects from the situation found in great apes. While not extensive enough to allow for general conclusions about the evolution of hand preferences in gibbons or apes in general, our results add to the expanding knowledge on manual lateralization in the Hylobatidae. PeerJ Inc. 2018-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6098942/ /pubmed/30128182 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5348 Text en ©2018 Caspar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Caspar, Kai R. Mader, Larissa Pallasdies, Fabian Lindenmeier, Miriam Begall, Sabine Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
title | Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
title_full | Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
title_fullStr | Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
title_full_unstemmed | Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
title_short | Captive gibbons (Hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
title_sort | captive gibbons (hylobatidae) use different referential cues in an object-choice task: insights into lesser ape cognition and manual laterality |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128182 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casparkair captivegibbonshylobatidaeusedifferentreferentialcuesinanobjectchoicetaskinsightsintolesserapecognitionandmanuallaterality AT maderlarissa captivegibbonshylobatidaeusedifferentreferentialcuesinanobjectchoicetaskinsightsintolesserapecognitionandmanuallaterality AT pallasdiesfabian captivegibbonshylobatidaeusedifferentreferentialcuesinanobjectchoicetaskinsightsintolesserapecognitionandmanuallaterality AT lindenmeiermiriam captivegibbonshylobatidaeusedifferentreferentialcuesinanobjectchoicetaskinsightsintolesserapecognitionandmanuallaterality AT begallsabine captivegibbonshylobatidaeusedifferentreferentialcuesinanobjectchoicetaskinsightsintolesserapecognitionandmanuallaterality |