Cargando…

Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND: The primary management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is conservative. Once the causative organism has been identified, by blood culture or biopsy, administration of appropriate intravenous antibiotics is started. Occasionally patients do not respond to antibiotics and surgical irrigation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffith-Jones, William, Nasto, Luigi Aurelio, Pola, Enrico, Stokes, Oliver M., Mehdian, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0496-9
_version_ 1783348569270386688
author Griffith-Jones, William
Nasto, Luigi Aurelio
Pola, Enrico
Stokes, Oliver M.
Mehdian, Hossein
author_facet Griffith-Jones, William
Nasto, Luigi Aurelio
Pola, Enrico
Stokes, Oliver M.
Mehdian, Hossein
author_sort Griffith-Jones, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is conservative. Once the causative organism has been identified, by blood culture or biopsy, administration of appropriate intravenous antibiotics is started. Occasionally patients do not respond to antibiotics and surgical irrigation and debridement is needed. The treatment of these cases is challenging and controversial. Furthermore, many affected patients have significant comorbidities often precluding more extensive surgical intervention. The aim of this study is to describe early results of a novel, minimally invasive percutaneous technique for disc irrigation and debridement in pyogenic spondylodiscitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of 10 consecutive patients diagnosed with pyogenic spondylodiscitis received percutaneous disc irrigation and debridement. The procedure was performed by inserting two Jamshidi needles percutaneously into the disc space. Indications for surgery were poor response to antibiotic therapy (8 patients) and the need for more extensive biopsy (2 patients). Pre- and postoperative white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analogue score (VAS) for back pain were collected. Minimum follow-up was 18 months, with regular interval assessments. RESULTS: There were 7 males and 3 females with a mean age of 67 years. The mean WBC before surgery was 14.63 × 10(9)/L (10.9–26.4) and dropped to 7.48 × 10(9)/L (5.6–9.8) after surgery. The mean preoperative CRP was 188 mg/L (111–250) and decreased to 13.83 mg/L (5–21) after surgery. Similar improvements were seen with ESR. All patients reported significant improvements in ODI and VAS scores after surgery. The average hospital stay after surgery was 8.17 days. All patients had resolution of the infection, and there were no complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility and safety of our percutaneous technique for irrigation and debridement of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Percutaneous irrigation and suction offers a truly minimally invasive option for managing recalcitrant spondylodiscitis or for diagnostic purposes. The approach used is very similar to discography and can be easily adapted to different hospital settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s10195-018-0496-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6098991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60989912018-08-23 Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis Griffith-Jones, William Nasto, Luigi Aurelio Pola, Enrico Stokes, Oliver M. Mehdian, Hossein J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: The primary management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is conservative. Once the causative organism has been identified, by blood culture or biopsy, administration of appropriate intravenous antibiotics is started. Occasionally patients do not respond to antibiotics and surgical irrigation and debridement is needed. The treatment of these cases is challenging and controversial. Furthermore, many affected patients have significant comorbidities often precluding more extensive surgical intervention. The aim of this study is to describe early results of a novel, minimally invasive percutaneous technique for disc irrigation and debridement in pyogenic spondylodiscitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of 10 consecutive patients diagnosed with pyogenic spondylodiscitis received percutaneous disc irrigation and debridement. The procedure was performed by inserting two Jamshidi needles percutaneously into the disc space. Indications for surgery were poor response to antibiotic therapy (8 patients) and the need for more extensive biopsy (2 patients). Pre- and postoperative white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analogue score (VAS) for back pain were collected. Minimum follow-up was 18 months, with regular interval assessments. RESULTS: There were 7 males and 3 females with a mean age of 67 years. The mean WBC before surgery was 14.63 × 10(9)/L (10.9–26.4) and dropped to 7.48 × 10(9)/L (5.6–9.8) after surgery. The mean preoperative CRP was 188 mg/L (111–250) and decreased to 13.83 mg/L (5–21) after surgery. Similar improvements were seen with ESR. All patients reported significant improvements in ODI and VAS scores after surgery. The average hospital stay after surgery was 8.17 days. All patients had resolution of the infection, and there were no complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility and safety of our percutaneous technique for irrigation and debridement of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Percutaneous irrigation and suction offers a truly minimally invasive option for managing recalcitrant spondylodiscitis or for diagnostic purposes. The approach used is very similar to discography and can be easily adapted to different hospital settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s10195-018-0496-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-20 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6098991/ /pubmed/30123957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0496-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Griffith-Jones, William
Nasto, Luigi Aurelio
Pola, Enrico
Stokes, Oliver M.
Mehdian, Hossein
Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
title Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
title_full Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
title_fullStr Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
title_short Percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
title_sort percutaneous suction and irrigation for the treatment of recalcitrant pyogenic spondylodiscitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6098991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0496-9
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithjoneswilliam percutaneoussuctionandirrigationforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantpyogenicspondylodiscitis
AT nastoluigiaurelio percutaneoussuctionandirrigationforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantpyogenicspondylodiscitis
AT polaenrico percutaneoussuctionandirrigationforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantpyogenicspondylodiscitis
AT stokesoliverm percutaneoussuctionandirrigationforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantpyogenicspondylodiscitis
AT mehdianhossein percutaneoussuctionandirrigationforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantpyogenicspondylodiscitis