Cargando…

Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines

BACKGROUND: The potential role of oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines was investigated in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS: Prior to the vaccination campaign, a house-to-house survey was carried out to collect data on the dog population in the study area, the coastal vill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estrada, Roland, Vos, Ad, De Leon, Renato, Mueller, Thomas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC60992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11737869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-1-23
_version_ 1782120123884109824
author Estrada, Roland
Vos, Ad
De Leon, Renato
Mueller, Thomas
author_facet Estrada, Roland
Vos, Ad
De Leon, Renato
Mueller, Thomas
author_sort Estrada, Roland
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The potential role of oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines was investigated in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS: Prior to the vaccination campaign, a house-to-house survey was carried out to collect data on the dog population in the study area, the coastal village of Mindoro. During the vaccination campaign all households were visited again, and all dogs encountered (>2 months old) were, if possible, vaccinated. Furthermore, 14 dogs vaccinated were bled on different occasions. RESULTS: During the survey, a total of 216 dogs were counted, and none of these animals had previously been vaccinated against rabies. Only 17 dogs could be restrained and subsequently vaccinated directly by the vaccinators. Another 126 dogs were offered a local-made boiled intestine bait, containing a capsule filled with 3.0 ml SAD B19 (10(7.9) FFU/ml). The bait acceptance rate of dogs offered a bait was 96.1%. The vaccination coverage of the dog population (> 2 months old) estimated by the number of animals vaccinated directly and the number of dogs that accepted a bait and subsequently punctured the vaccine container was 76%. Fifteen and 29 days after the vaccination campaign 6 and 10 dogs (n = 14) had rabies virus neutralizing antibody titres of ≥ 0.5 IU/ml, respectively. No unintentional contacts of nontarget species, including humans, with the vaccine virus were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the campaign show that oral vaccination of dogs against rabies is a promising supplementary method in dog rabies control in the Philippines.
format Text
id pubmed-60992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-609922001-12-17 Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines Estrada, Roland Vos, Ad De Leon, Renato Mueller, Thomas BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The potential role of oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines was investigated in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS: Prior to the vaccination campaign, a house-to-house survey was carried out to collect data on the dog population in the study area, the coastal village of Mindoro. During the vaccination campaign all households were visited again, and all dogs encountered (>2 months old) were, if possible, vaccinated. Furthermore, 14 dogs vaccinated were bled on different occasions. RESULTS: During the survey, a total of 216 dogs were counted, and none of these animals had previously been vaccinated against rabies. Only 17 dogs could be restrained and subsequently vaccinated directly by the vaccinators. Another 126 dogs were offered a local-made boiled intestine bait, containing a capsule filled with 3.0 ml SAD B19 (10(7.9) FFU/ml). The bait acceptance rate of dogs offered a bait was 96.1%. The vaccination coverage of the dog population (> 2 months old) estimated by the number of animals vaccinated directly and the number of dogs that accepted a bait and subsequently punctured the vaccine container was 76%. Fifteen and 29 days after the vaccination campaign 6 and 10 dogs (n = 14) had rabies virus neutralizing antibody titres of ≥ 0.5 IU/ml, respectively. No unintentional contacts of nontarget species, including humans, with the vaccine virus were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the campaign show that oral vaccination of dogs against rabies is a promising supplementary method in dog rabies control in the Philippines. BioMed Central 2001-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC60992/ /pubmed/11737869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-1-23 Text en Copyright © 2001 Estrada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Estrada, Roland
Vos, Ad
De Leon, Renato
Mueller, Thomas
Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines
title Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines
title_full Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines
title_fullStr Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines
title_short Field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the Philippines
title_sort field trial with oral vaccination of dogs against rabies in the philippines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC60992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11737869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-1-23
work_keys_str_mv AT estradaroland fieldtrialwithoralvaccinationofdogsagainstrabiesinthephilippines
AT vosad fieldtrialwithoralvaccinationofdogsagainstrabiesinthephilippines
AT deleonrenato fieldtrialwithoralvaccinationofdogsagainstrabiesinthephilippines
AT muellerthomas fieldtrialwithoralvaccinationofdogsagainstrabiesinthephilippines