Cargando…

Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes

AIMS: Hypoglycaemia causes QT‐interval prolongation and appears pro‐arrhythmogenic. Salbutamol, a β(2)‐adrenoreceptor agonist also causes QT‐interval prolongation. We hypothesized that the magnitude of electrophysiological changes induced by salbutamol and hypoglycaemia might relate to each other an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novodvorsky, P., Bernjak, A., Robinson, E. J., Iqbal, A., Macdonald, I. A., Jacques, R. M., Marques, J. L. B., Sheridan, P. J., Heller, S. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13650
_version_ 1783348613333647360
author Novodvorsky, P.
Bernjak, A.
Robinson, E. J.
Iqbal, A.
Macdonald, I. A.
Jacques, R. M.
Marques, J. L. B.
Sheridan, P. J.
Heller, S. R.
author_facet Novodvorsky, P.
Bernjak, A.
Robinson, E. J.
Iqbal, A.
Macdonald, I. A.
Jacques, R. M.
Marques, J. L. B.
Sheridan, P. J.
Heller, S. R.
author_sort Novodvorsky, P.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Hypoglycaemia causes QT‐interval prolongation and appears pro‐arrhythmogenic. Salbutamol, a β(2)‐adrenoreceptor agonist also causes QT‐interval prolongation. We hypothesized that the magnitude of electrophysiological changes induced by salbutamol and hypoglycaemia might relate to each other and that salbutamol could be used as a non‐invasive screening tool for predicting an individual's electrophysiological response to hypoglycaemia. METHODS: Eighteen individuals with Type 1 diabetes were administered 2.5 mg of nebulized salbutamol. Participants then underwent a hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp (2.5 mmol/l for 1 h). During both experiments, heart rate and serum potassium (and catecholamines during the clamp) were measured and a high‐resolution electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded at pre‐set time points. Cardiac repolarization was measured by QT‐interval duration adjusted for heart rate (QT (c)), T‐wave amplitude (T(amp)), T‐peak to T‐end interval duration (T(p)T(end)) and T‐wave area symmetry (T(sym)). The maximum changes vs. baseline in both experiments were assessed for their linear dependence. RESULTS: Salbutamol administration caused QT (c) and T(p)T(end) prolongation and a decrease in T(amp) and T(sym). Hypoglycaemia caused increased plasma catecholamines, hypokalaemia, QT (c) and T(p)T(end) prolongation, and a decrease in T(amp) and T(sym). No significant correlations were found between maximum changes in QT (c) [r = 0.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) −0.341 to 0.576; P = 0.553), T(p)T(end) (r = 0.075, 95% CI −0.406 to 0.524; P = 0.767), T(sym) (r = 0.355, 95% CI −0.132 to 0.706; P = 0.149) or T(amp) (r = 0.148, 95% CI −0.347 to 0.572; P = 0.558) in either experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Both hypoglycaemia and salbutamol caused pro‐arrhythmogenic electrophysiological changes in people with Type 1 diabetes but were not related in any given individual. Salbutamol does not appear useful in assessing an individual's electrophysiological response to hypoglycaemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60992092018-08-23 Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes Novodvorsky, P. Bernjak, A. Robinson, E. J. Iqbal, A. Macdonald, I. A. Jacques, R. M. Marques, J. L. B. Sheridan, P. J. Heller, S. R. Diabet Med Research Articles AIMS: Hypoglycaemia causes QT‐interval prolongation and appears pro‐arrhythmogenic. Salbutamol, a β(2)‐adrenoreceptor agonist also causes QT‐interval prolongation. We hypothesized that the magnitude of electrophysiological changes induced by salbutamol and hypoglycaemia might relate to each other and that salbutamol could be used as a non‐invasive screening tool for predicting an individual's electrophysiological response to hypoglycaemia. METHODS: Eighteen individuals with Type 1 diabetes were administered 2.5 mg of nebulized salbutamol. Participants then underwent a hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp (2.5 mmol/l for 1 h). During both experiments, heart rate and serum potassium (and catecholamines during the clamp) were measured and a high‐resolution electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded at pre‐set time points. Cardiac repolarization was measured by QT‐interval duration adjusted for heart rate (QT (c)), T‐wave amplitude (T(amp)), T‐peak to T‐end interval duration (T(p)T(end)) and T‐wave area symmetry (T(sym)). The maximum changes vs. baseline in both experiments were assessed for their linear dependence. RESULTS: Salbutamol administration caused QT (c) and T(p)T(end) prolongation and a decrease in T(amp) and T(sym). Hypoglycaemia caused increased plasma catecholamines, hypokalaemia, QT (c) and T(p)T(end) prolongation, and a decrease in T(amp) and T(sym). No significant correlations were found between maximum changes in QT (c) [r = 0.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) −0.341 to 0.576; P = 0.553), T(p)T(end) (r = 0.075, 95% CI −0.406 to 0.524; P = 0.767), T(sym) (r = 0.355, 95% CI −0.132 to 0.706; P = 0.149) or T(amp) (r = 0.148, 95% CI −0.347 to 0.572; P = 0.558) in either experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Both hypoglycaemia and salbutamol caused pro‐arrhythmogenic electrophysiological changes in people with Type 1 diabetes but were not related in any given individual. Salbutamol does not appear useful in assessing an individual's electrophysiological response to hypoglycaemia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-16 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6099209/ /pubmed/29682793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13650 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Novodvorsky, P.
Bernjak, A.
Robinson, E. J.
Iqbal, A.
Macdonald, I. A.
Jacques, R. M.
Marques, J. L. B.
Sheridan, P. J.
Heller, S. R.
Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes
title Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes
title_full Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes
title_fullStr Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes
title_short Salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with Type 1 diabetes
title_sort salbutamol‐induced electrophysiological changes show no correlation with electrophysiological changes during hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic clamp in young people with type 1 diabetes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13650
work_keys_str_mv AT novodvorskyp salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT bernjaka salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT robinsonej salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT iqbala salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT macdonaldia salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT jacquesrm salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT marquesjlb salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT sheridanpj salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes
AT hellersr salbutamolinducedelectrophysiologicalchangesshownocorrelationwithelectrophysiologicalchangesduringhyperinsulinaemichypoglycaemicclampinyoungpeoplewithtype1diabetes