Cargando…

Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis

1. At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Silvia, Bauer, Thomas, Strauss, Peter, Kratschmer, Sophie, Paredes, Daniel, Popescu, Daniela, Landa, Blanca, Guzmán, Gema, Gómez, José A., Guernion, Muriel, Zaller, Johann G., Batáry, Péter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124
_version_ 1783348617096986624
author Winter, Silvia
Bauer, Thomas
Strauss, Peter
Kratschmer, Sophie
Paredes, Daniel
Popescu, Daniela
Landa, Blanca
Guzmán, Gema
Gómez, José A.
Guernion, Muriel
Zaller, Johann G.
Batáry, Péter
author_facet Winter, Silvia
Bauer, Thomas
Strauss, Peter
Kratschmer, Sophie
Paredes, Daniel
Popescu, Daniela
Landa, Blanca
Guzmán, Gema
Gómez, José A.
Guernion, Muriel
Zaller, Johann G.
Batáry, Péter
author_sort Winter, Silvia
collection PubMed
description 1. At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter‐row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter‐rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter‐row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. 2. We performed a hierarchical meta‐analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter‐row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine‐producing countries. 3. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above‐ and below‐ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter‐row soil tillage. 4. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter‐row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade‐off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our meta‐analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter‐rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri‐environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter‐rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine‐growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60992252018-08-23 Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis Winter, Silvia Bauer, Thomas Strauss, Peter Kratschmer, Sophie Paredes, Daniel Popescu, Daniela Landa, Blanca Guzmán, Gema Gómez, José A. Guernion, Muriel Zaller, Johann G. Batáry, Péter J Appl Ecol Above‐belowground Interactions 1. At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter‐row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter‐rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter‐row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. 2. We performed a hierarchical meta‐analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter‐row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine‐producing countries. 3. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above‐ and below‐ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter‐row soil tillage. 4. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter‐row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade‐off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our meta‐analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter‐rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri‐environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter‐rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine‐growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-04 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6099225/ /pubmed/30147143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Above‐belowground Interactions
Winter, Silvia
Bauer, Thomas
Strauss, Peter
Kratschmer, Sophie
Paredes, Daniel
Popescu, Daniela
Landa, Blanca
Guzmán, Gema
Gómez, José A.
Guernion, Muriel
Zaller, Johann G.
Batáry, Péter
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
title Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
title_full Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
title_short Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
title_sort effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta‐analysis
topic Above‐belowground Interactions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124
work_keys_str_mv AT wintersilvia effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT bauerthomas effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT strausspeter effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT kratschmersophie effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT paredesdaniel effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT popescudaniela effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT landablanca effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT guzmangema effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT gomezjosea effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT guernionmuriel effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT zallerjohanng effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis
AT batarypeter effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis