Cargando…
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis
1. At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124 |
_version_ | 1783348617096986624 |
---|---|
author | Winter, Silvia Bauer, Thomas Strauss, Peter Kratschmer, Sophie Paredes, Daniel Popescu, Daniela Landa, Blanca Guzmán, Gema Gómez, José A. Guernion, Muriel Zaller, Johann G. Batáry, Péter |
author_facet | Winter, Silvia Bauer, Thomas Strauss, Peter Kratschmer, Sophie Paredes, Daniel Popescu, Daniela Landa, Blanca Guzmán, Gema Gómez, José A. Guernion, Muriel Zaller, Johann G. Batáry, Péter |
author_sort | Winter, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter‐row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter‐rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter‐row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. 2. We performed a hierarchical meta‐analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter‐row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine‐producing countries. 3. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above‐ and below‐ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter‐row soil tillage. 4. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter‐row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade‐off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our meta‐analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter‐rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri‐environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter‐rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine‐growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6099225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60992252018-08-23 Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis Winter, Silvia Bauer, Thomas Strauss, Peter Kratschmer, Sophie Paredes, Daniel Popescu, Daniela Landa, Blanca Guzmán, Gema Gómez, José A. Guernion, Muriel Zaller, Johann G. Batáry, Péter J Appl Ecol Above‐belowground Interactions 1. At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter‐row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter‐rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter‐row management affects biodiversity and associated ES. 2. We performed a hierarchical meta‐analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter‐row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine‐producing countries. 3. Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above‐ and below‐ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter‐row soil tillage. 4. Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter‐row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade‐off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our meta‐analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter‐rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri‐environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter‐rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine‐growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-04 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6099225/ /pubmed/30147143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Above‐belowground Interactions Winter, Silvia Bauer, Thomas Strauss, Peter Kratschmer, Sophie Paredes, Daniel Popescu, Daniela Landa, Blanca Guzmán, Gema Gómez, José A. Guernion, Muriel Zaller, Johann G. Batáry, Péter Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis |
title | Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Above‐belowground Interactions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wintersilvia effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT bauerthomas effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT strausspeter effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT kratschmersophie effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT paredesdaniel effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT popescudaniela effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT landablanca effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT guzmangema effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT gomezjosea effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT guernionmuriel effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT zallerjohanng effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis AT batarypeter effectsofvegetationmanagementintensityonbiodiversityandecosystemservicesinvineyardsametaanalysis |