Cargando…

Effect of implant therapy on oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐49), health status (SF‐36), and satisfaction of patients with several agenetic teeth: Prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Effect of fixed prosthodontics on patients with several agenetic teeth is not well understood. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of implant‐based fixed prosthodontics on oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), general health status, and satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filius, Marieke A.P., Vissink, Arjan, Cune, Marco S., Raghoebar, Gerry M., Visser, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29787641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12625
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Effect of fixed prosthodontics on patients with several agenetic teeth is not well understood. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of implant‐based fixed prosthodontics on oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), general health status, and satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability to chew and speech in patients with several agenetic teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, all patients (≥18 years) with several agenetic teeth who were scheduled for treatment with fixed dental implants between September 2013 and July 2015 at our department were approached. Participants received a set of questionnaires before and 1 year after implant placement to assess OHRQoL (OHIP‐NL49), general health status (SF‐36), and satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability to chew and speech. RESULTS: About 25 out of 31 eligible patients (10 male, 15 female; median age: 20 [19;23] years; agenetic teeth: 7 [5;10]) were willing to participate. Pre‐ and post‐treatment OHIP‐NL49 sum‐scores were 38 [28;56] and 17 [7;29], respectively (P < .001). Scores of all OHIP‐NL49 subdomains decreased tool, representing an improved OHRQoL (P < .05) as well as that satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability to chew and speech increased (P < .001). General health status did not change with implant treatment (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with implant‐based fixed prosthodontics improves OHRQoL and satisfaction with dental appearance, ability to chew and speech, while not affecting general health status.