Cargando…

Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting

OBJECTIVES: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varyi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terhaar, Catherine, Teed, Nicole, Allen, Rachel, Dohany, Lindsay, Settler, Christina, Holland, Carol, Longman, Ryan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5272
_version_ 1783348633120276480
author Terhaar, Catherine
Teed, Nicole
Allen, Rachel
Dohany, Lindsay
Settler, Christina
Holland, Carol
Longman, Ryan E.
author_facet Terhaar, Catherine
Teed, Nicole
Allen, Rachel
Dohany, Lindsay
Settler, Christina
Holland, Carol
Longman, Ryan E.
author_sort Terhaar, Catherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varying in size from 3 to 218 disorders. METHODS: We reviewed outcomes for 3 multigene carrier screening panels: trio (3 diseases), standard (23 diseases), and global (218 diseases). All panels used targeted genotype analysis of preselected mutations via next‐generation sequencing. We calculated positivity rates for each panel. RESULTS: Positivity rates were 7.2% for Preparent Trio, 13.2% for Preparent Standard, and 35.8% for Preparent Global. The most frequent positive results in the global panel were (in descending order): abnormal hemoglobin electrophoresis, familial Mediterranean fever, cystic fibrosis, fragile X, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, alpha‐thalassemia, and nonsyndromic hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: While genetic diseases are individually rare, they are cumulatively common. Our experience illustrates that, with a panel of 218 diseases, the likelihood of identifying a carrier can be as high as 36%. Understanding panel positivity rates is one important factor for providers when choosing the right test for their practice, setting appropriate expectations for patients, and planning for follow‐up counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60992942018-08-23 Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting Terhaar, Catherine Teed, Nicole Allen, Rachel Dohany, Lindsay Settler, Christina Holland, Carol Longman, Ryan E. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varying in size from 3 to 218 disorders. METHODS: We reviewed outcomes for 3 multigene carrier screening panels: trio (3 diseases), standard (23 diseases), and global (218 diseases). All panels used targeted genotype analysis of preselected mutations via next‐generation sequencing. We calculated positivity rates for each panel. RESULTS: Positivity rates were 7.2% for Preparent Trio, 13.2% for Preparent Standard, and 35.8% for Preparent Global. The most frequent positive results in the global panel were (in descending order): abnormal hemoglobin electrophoresis, familial Mediterranean fever, cystic fibrosis, fragile X, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, alpha‐thalassemia, and nonsyndromic hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: While genetic diseases are individually rare, they are cumulatively common. Our experience illustrates that, with a panel of 218 diseases, the likelihood of identifying a carrier can be as high as 36%. Understanding panel positivity rates is one important factor for providers when choosing the right test for their practice, setting appropriate expectations for patients, and planning for follow‐up counseling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-17 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6099294/ /pubmed/29683194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5272 Text en © 2018 The Authors Prenatal Diagnosis Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Terhaar, Catherine
Teed, Nicole
Allen, Rachel
Dohany, Lindsay
Settler, Christina
Holland, Carol
Longman, Ryan E.
Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
title Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
title_full Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
title_fullStr Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
title_full_unstemmed Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
title_short Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
title_sort clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5272
work_keys_str_mv AT terhaarcatherine clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting
AT teednicole clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting
AT allenrachel clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting
AT dohanylindsay clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting
AT settlerchristina clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting
AT hollandcarol clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting
AT longmanryane clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting