Cargando…
Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting
OBJECTIVES: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varyi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5272 |
_version_ | 1783348633120276480 |
---|---|
author | Terhaar, Catherine Teed, Nicole Allen, Rachel Dohany, Lindsay Settler, Christina Holland, Carol Longman, Ryan E. |
author_facet | Terhaar, Catherine Teed, Nicole Allen, Rachel Dohany, Lindsay Settler, Christina Holland, Carol Longman, Ryan E. |
author_sort | Terhaar, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varying in size from 3 to 218 disorders. METHODS: We reviewed outcomes for 3 multigene carrier screening panels: trio (3 diseases), standard (23 diseases), and global (218 diseases). All panels used targeted genotype analysis of preselected mutations via next‐generation sequencing. We calculated positivity rates for each panel. RESULTS: Positivity rates were 7.2% for Preparent Trio, 13.2% for Preparent Standard, and 35.8% for Preparent Global. The most frequent positive results in the global panel were (in descending order): abnormal hemoglobin electrophoresis, familial Mediterranean fever, cystic fibrosis, fragile X, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, alpha‐thalassemia, and nonsyndromic hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: While genetic diseases are individually rare, they are cumulatively common. Our experience illustrates that, with a panel of 218 diseases, the likelihood of identifying a carrier can be as high as 36%. Understanding panel positivity rates is one important factor for providers when choosing the right test for their practice, setting appropriate expectations for patients, and planning for follow‐up counseling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6099294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60992942018-08-23 Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting Terhaar, Catherine Teed, Nicole Allen, Rachel Dohany, Lindsay Settler, Christina Holland, Carol Longman, Ryan E. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Expanded carrier testing is acknowledged as an acceptable strategy for carrier testing by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Limited studies have investigated positivity rates of expanded carrier panels. We describe our experience with 3 commercial laboratory panels varying in size from 3 to 218 disorders. METHODS: We reviewed outcomes for 3 multigene carrier screening panels: trio (3 diseases), standard (23 diseases), and global (218 diseases). All panels used targeted genotype analysis of preselected mutations via next‐generation sequencing. We calculated positivity rates for each panel. RESULTS: Positivity rates were 7.2% for Preparent Trio, 13.2% for Preparent Standard, and 35.8% for Preparent Global. The most frequent positive results in the global panel were (in descending order): abnormal hemoglobin electrophoresis, familial Mediterranean fever, cystic fibrosis, fragile X, glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, alpha‐thalassemia, and nonsyndromic hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: While genetic diseases are individually rare, they are cumulatively common. Our experience illustrates that, with a panel of 218 diseases, the likelihood of identifying a carrier can be as high as 36%. Understanding panel positivity rates is one important factor for providers when choosing the right test for their practice, setting appropriate expectations for patients, and planning for follow‐up counseling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-17 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6099294/ /pubmed/29683194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5272 Text en © 2018 The Authors Prenatal Diagnosis Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Terhaar, Catherine Teed, Nicole Allen, Rachel Dohany, Lindsay Settler, Christina Holland, Carol Longman, Ryan E. Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
title | Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
title_full | Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
title_fullStr | Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
title_short | Clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
title_sort | clinical experience with multigene carrier panels in the reproductive setting |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terhaarcatherine clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting AT teednicole clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting AT allenrachel clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting AT dohanylindsay clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting AT settlerchristina clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting AT hollandcarol clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting AT longmanryane clinicalexperiencewithmultigenecarrierpanelsinthereproductivesetting |