Cargando…

Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection

The purpose of this study was to identify factors which impact a couples’ decision‐making between the options of vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection when counseled both by a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. A retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavoussi, P. K., Kavoussi, K. M., Odenwald, K. C., Kavoussi, S. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29611308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12491
_version_ 1783348646401540096
author Kavoussi, P. K.
Kavoussi, K. M.
Odenwald, K. C.
Kavoussi, S. K.
author_facet Kavoussi, P. K.
Kavoussi, K. M.
Odenwald, K. C.
Kavoussi, S. K.
author_sort Kavoussi, P. K.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to identify factors which impact a couples’ decision‐making between the options of vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection when counseled both by a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. A retrospective chart review was performed of couples who wish to achieve a pregnancy with a male partner with a history of prior vasectomy, in a couples’ private fertility center. Of patients presenting for fertility options with a history of vasectomy, 175 couples elected to be counseled by both a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist on the options between vasectomy reversal and sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with 78.3% of the couples opting for vasectomy reversal and 21.7% opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The overall mean age of the male partners was 40.5 years of age, and the mean age of the female partners was 33. The mean obstructed interval was 9.7 years. Twenty‐three percent of the female partners in couples selecting vasectomy reversal had diminished ovarian reserve, and 31.6% of couples selecting sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection had female partners with diminished ovarian reserve, two of which elected to have donor oocyte in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Male age, female age, and ovarian reserve status did not have significant roles in this decision‐making (p value 0.3578, 0.1185, and 0.3041, respectively); however, a longer obstructed interval since vasectomy was a significant factor associated with couples opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (0.0238). In this study, the majority of couples who were counseled on vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection by a reproductive urologist and reproductive endocrinologist chose vasectomy reversal. Neither male partner age, female partner age, nor ovarian reserve status seemed to impact the decision; however, a longer obstructed interval was a significant factor that was associated with the decision of couples toward sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than vasectomy reversal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60993542018-08-24 Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection Kavoussi, P. K. Kavoussi, K. M. Odenwald, K. C. Kavoussi, S. K. Andrology Original Articles The purpose of this study was to identify factors which impact a couples’ decision‐making between the options of vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection when counseled both by a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. A retrospective chart review was performed of couples who wish to achieve a pregnancy with a male partner with a history of prior vasectomy, in a couples’ private fertility center. Of patients presenting for fertility options with a history of vasectomy, 175 couples elected to be counseled by both a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist on the options between vasectomy reversal and sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with 78.3% of the couples opting for vasectomy reversal and 21.7% opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The overall mean age of the male partners was 40.5 years of age, and the mean age of the female partners was 33. The mean obstructed interval was 9.7 years. Twenty‐three percent of the female partners in couples selecting vasectomy reversal had diminished ovarian reserve, and 31.6% of couples selecting sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection had female partners with diminished ovarian reserve, two of which elected to have donor oocyte in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Male age, female age, and ovarian reserve status did not have significant roles in this decision‐making (p value 0.3578, 0.1185, and 0.3041, respectively); however, a longer obstructed interval since vasectomy was a significant factor associated with couples opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (0.0238). In this study, the majority of couples who were counseled on vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection by a reproductive urologist and reproductive endocrinologist chose vasectomy reversal. Neither male partner age, female partner age, nor ovarian reserve status seemed to impact the decision; however, a longer obstructed interval was a significant factor that was associated with the decision of couples toward sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than vasectomy reversal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-02 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6099354/ /pubmed/29611308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12491 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Andrology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kavoussi, P. K.
Kavoussi, K. M.
Odenwald, K. C.
Kavoussi, S. K.
Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_fullStr Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full_unstemmed Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_short Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_sort factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29611308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12491
work_keys_str_mv AT kavoussipk factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT kavoussikm factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT odenwaldkc factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT kavoussisk factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection