Cargando…
Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection
The purpose of this study was to identify factors which impact a couples’ decision‐making between the options of vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection when counseled both by a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. A retros...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29611308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12491 |
_version_ | 1783348646401540096 |
---|---|
author | Kavoussi, P. K. Kavoussi, K. M. Odenwald, K. C. Kavoussi, S. K. |
author_facet | Kavoussi, P. K. Kavoussi, K. M. Odenwald, K. C. Kavoussi, S. K. |
author_sort | Kavoussi, P. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to identify factors which impact a couples’ decision‐making between the options of vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection when counseled both by a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. A retrospective chart review was performed of couples who wish to achieve a pregnancy with a male partner with a history of prior vasectomy, in a couples’ private fertility center. Of patients presenting for fertility options with a history of vasectomy, 175 couples elected to be counseled by both a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist on the options between vasectomy reversal and sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with 78.3% of the couples opting for vasectomy reversal and 21.7% opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The overall mean age of the male partners was 40.5 years of age, and the mean age of the female partners was 33. The mean obstructed interval was 9.7 years. Twenty‐three percent of the female partners in couples selecting vasectomy reversal had diminished ovarian reserve, and 31.6% of couples selecting sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection had female partners with diminished ovarian reserve, two of which elected to have donor oocyte in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Male age, female age, and ovarian reserve status did not have significant roles in this decision‐making (p value 0.3578, 0.1185, and 0.3041, respectively); however, a longer obstructed interval since vasectomy was a significant factor associated with couples opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (0.0238). In this study, the majority of couples who were counseled on vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection by a reproductive urologist and reproductive endocrinologist chose vasectomy reversal. Neither male partner age, female partner age, nor ovarian reserve status seemed to impact the decision; however, a longer obstructed interval was a significant factor that was associated with the decision of couples toward sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than vasectomy reversal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6099354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60993542018-08-24 Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection Kavoussi, P. K. Kavoussi, K. M. Odenwald, K. C. Kavoussi, S. K. Andrology Original Articles The purpose of this study was to identify factors which impact a couples’ decision‐making between the options of vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection when counseled both by a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist. A retrospective chart review was performed of couples who wish to achieve a pregnancy with a male partner with a history of prior vasectomy, in a couples’ private fertility center. Of patients presenting for fertility options with a history of vasectomy, 175 couples elected to be counseled by both a reproductive urologist and a reproductive endocrinologist on the options between vasectomy reversal and sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with 78.3% of the couples opting for vasectomy reversal and 21.7% opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The overall mean age of the male partners was 40.5 years of age, and the mean age of the female partners was 33. The mean obstructed interval was 9.7 years. Twenty‐three percent of the female partners in couples selecting vasectomy reversal had diminished ovarian reserve, and 31.6% of couples selecting sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection had female partners with diminished ovarian reserve, two of which elected to have donor oocyte in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Male age, female age, and ovarian reserve status did not have significant roles in this decision‐making (p value 0.3578, 0.1185, and 0.3041, respectively); however, a longer obstructed interval since vasectomy was a significant factor associated with couples opting for sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (0.0238). In this study, the majority of couples who were counseled on vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection by a reproductive urologist and reproductive endocrinologist chose vasectomy reversal. Neither male partner age, female partner age, nor ovarian reserve status seemed to impact the decision; however, a longer obstructed interval was a significant factor that was associated with the decision of couples toward sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than vasectomy reversal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-02 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6099354/ /pubmed/29611308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12491 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Andrology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kavoussi, P. K. Kavoussi, K. M. Odenwald, K. C. Kavoussi, S. K. Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title | Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_full | Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_fullStr | Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_short | Factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_sort | factors impacting couples’ decision‐making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29611308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavoussipk factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT kavoussikm factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT odenwaldkc factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT kavoussisk factorsimpactingcouplesdecisionmakingbetweenvasectomyreversalversusspermretrievalinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection |