Cargando…
Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding how atrial activation mode and heart rate affect optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We studied these questions using high‐reproducibility hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. METHODS: Twenty patients were hemo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29856077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13401 |
_version_ | 1783348651614011392 |
---|---|
author | Kyriacou, Andreas Rajkumar, Christopher A. Pabari, Punam A. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Willson, Keith Peters, Nicholas S. Lim, Phang B. Kanagaratnam, Prapa Hughes, Alun D. Mayet, Jamil Whinnett, Zachary I. Francis, Darrel P. |
author_facet | Kyriacou, Andreas Rajkumar, Christopher A. Pabari, Punam A. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Willson, Keith Peters, Nicholas S. Lim, Phang B. Kanagaratnam, Prapa Hughes, Alun D. Mayet, Jamil Whinnett, Zachary I. Francis, Darrel P. |
author_sort | Kyriacou, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding how atrial activation mode and heart rate affect optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We studied these questions using high‐reproducibility hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. METHODS: Twenty patients were hemodynamically optimized using noninvasive beat‐to‐beat blood pressure at rest (62 ± 11 beats/min), during exercise (80 ± 6 beats/min), and at three atrially paced rates: 5, 25, and 45 beats/min above rest, denoted as A(paced,r+5), A(paced,r+25), and A(paced,r+45), respectively. Left atrial myocardial motion and transmitral flow were timed echocardiographically. RESULTS: During atrial sensing, raising heart rate shortened optimal AV delay by 25 ± 6 ms (P < 0.001). During atrial pacing, raising heart rate from A(paced,r+5) to A(paced,r+25) shortened it by 16 ± 6 ms; A(paced,r+45) shortened it 17 ± 6 ms further (P < 0.001). In comparison to atrial‐sensed activation, atrial pacing lengthened optimal AV delay by 76 ± 6 ms (P < 0.0001) at rest, and at ∼20 beats/min faster, by 85 ± 7 ms (P < 0.0001), 9 ± 4 ms more (P = 0.017). Mechanically, atrial pacing delayed left atrial contraction by 63 ± 5 ms at rest and by 73 ± 5 ms (i.e., by 10 ± 5 ms more, P < 0.05) at ∼20 beats/min faster. Raising atrial rate by exercise advanced left atrial contraction by 7 ± 2 ms (P = 0.001). Raising it by atrial pacing did not (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic optimal AV delay shortens with elevation of heart rate. It lengthens on switching from atrial‐sensed to atrial‐paced at the same rate, and echocardiography shows this sensed‐paced difference in optima results from a sensed‐paced difference in atrial electromechanical delay. The reason for the widening of the sensed‐paced difference in AV optimum may be physiological stimuli (e.g., adrenergic drive) advancing left atrial contraction during exercise but not with fast atrial pacing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6099378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60993782018-08-24 Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT Kyriacou, Andreas Rajkumar, Christopher A. Pabari, Punam A. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Willson, Keith Peters, Nicholas S. Lim, Phang B. Kanagaratnam, Prapa Hughes, Alun D. Mayet, Jamil Whinnett, Zachary I. Francis, Darrel P. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding how atrial activation mode and heart rate affect optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We studied these questions using high‐reproducibility hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. METHODS: Twenty patients were hemodynamically optimized using noninvasive beat‐to‐beat blood pressure at rest (62 ± 11 beats/min), during exercise (80 ± 6 beats/min), and at three atrially paced rates: 5, 25, and 45 beats/min above rest, denoted as A(paced,r+5), A(paced,r+25), and A(paced,r+45), respectively. Left atrial myocardial motion and transmitral flow were timed echocardiographically. RESULTS: During atrial sensing, raising heart rate shortened optimal AV delay by 25 ± 6 ms (P < 0.001). During atrial pacing, raising heart rate from A(paced,r+5) to A(paced,r+25) shortened it by 16 ± 6 ms; A(paced,r+45) shortened it 17 ± 6 ms further (P < 0.001). In comparison to atrial‐sensed activation, atrial pacing lengthened optimal AV delay by 76 ± 6 ms (P < 0.0001) at rest, and at ∼20 beats/min faster, by 85 ± 7 ms (P < 0.0001), 9 ± 4 ms more (P = 0.017). Mechanically, atrial pacing delayed left atrial contraction by 63 ± 5 ms at rest and by 73 ± 5 ms (i.e., by 10 ± 5 ms more, P < 0.05) at ∼20 beats/min faster. Raising atrial rate by exercise advanced left atrial contraction by 7 ± 2 ms (P = 0.001). Raising it by atrial pacing did not (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic optimal AV delay shortens with elevation of heart rate. It lengthens on switching from atrial‐sensed to atrial‐paced at the same rate, and echocardiography shows this sensed‐paced difference in optima results from a sensed‐paced difference in atrial electromechanical delay. The reason for the widening of the sensed‐paced difference in AV optimum may be physiological stimuli (e.g., adrenergic drive) advancing left atrial contraction during exercise but not with fast atrial pacing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-22 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6099378/ /pubmed/29856077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13401 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Devices Kyriacou, Andreas Rajkumar, Christopher A. Pabari, Punam A. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Willson, Keith Peters, Nicholas S. Lim, Phang B. Kanagaratnam, Prapa Hughes, Alun D. Mayet, Jamil Whinnett, Zachary I. Francis, Darrel P. Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT |
title | Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT |
title_full | Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT |
title_fullStr | Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT |
title_short | Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT |
title_sort | distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal av delay in crt |
topic | Devices |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29856077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kyriacouandreas distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT rajkumarchristophera distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT pabaripunama distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT sohaibsmafzal distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT willsonkeith distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT petersnicholass distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT limphangb distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT kanagaratnamprapa distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT hughesalund distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT mayetjamil distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT whinnettzacharyi distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt AT francisdarrelp distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt |