Cargando…

Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding how atrial activation mode and heart rate affect optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We studied these questions using high‐reproducibility hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. METHODS: Twenty patients were hemo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyriacou, Andreas, Rajkumar, Christopher A., Pabari, Punam A., Sohaib, S.M. Afzal, Willson, Keith, Peters, Nicholas S., Lim, Phang B., Kanagaratnam, Prapa, Hughes, Alun D., Mayet, Jamil, Whinnett, Zachary I., Francis, Darrel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29856077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13401
_version_ 1783348651614011392
author Kyriacou, Andreas
Rajkumar, Christopher A.
Pabari, Punam A.
Sohaib, S.M. Afzal
Willson, Keith
Peters, Nicholas S.
Lim, Phang B.
Kanagaratnam, Prapa
Hughes, Alun D.
Mayet, Jamil
Whinnett, Zachary I.
Francis, Darrel P.
author_facet Kyriacou, Andreas
Rajkumar, Christopher A.
Pabari, Punam A.
Sohaib, S.M. Afzal
Willson, Keith
Peters, Nicholas S.
Lim, Phang B.
Kanagaratnam, Prapa
Hughes, Alun D.
Mayet, Jamil
Whinnett, Zachary I.
Francis, Darrel P.
author_sort Kyriacou, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding how atrial activation mode and heart rate affect optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We studied these questions using high‐reproducibility hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. METHODS: Twenty patients were hemodynamically optimized using noninvasive beat‐to‐beat blood pressure at rest (62 ± 11 beats/min), during exercise (80 ± 6 beats/min), and at three atrially paced rates: 5, 25, and 45 beats/min above rest, denoted as A(paced,r+5), A(paced,r+25), and A(paced,r+45), respectively. Left atrial myocardial motion and transmitral flow were timed echocardiographically. RESULTS: During atrial sensing, raising heart rate shortened optimal AV delay by 25 ± 6 ms (P < 0.001). During atrial pacing, raising heart rate from A(paced,r+5) to A(paced,r+25) shortened it by 16 ± 6 ms; A(paced,r+45) shortened it 17 ± 6 ms further (P < 0.001). In comparison to atrial‐sensed activation, atrial pacing lengthened optimal AV delay by 76 ± 6 ms (P < 0.0001) at rest, and at ∼20 beats/min faster, by 85 ± 7 ms (P < 0.0001), 9 ± 4 ms more (P  =  0.017). Mechanically, atrial pacing delayed left atrial contraction by 63 ± 5 ms at rest and by 73 ± 5 ms (i.e., by 10 ± 5 ms more, P < 0.05) at ∼20 beats/min faster. Raising atrial rate by exercise advanced left atrial contraction by 7 ± 2 ms (P  =  0.001). Raising it by atrial pacing did not (P  =  0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic optimal AV delay shortens with elevation of heart rate. It lengthens on switching from atrial‐sensed to atrial‐paced at the same rate, and echocardiography shows this sensed‐paced difference in optima results from a sensed‐paced difference in atrial electromechanical delay. The reason for the widening of the sensed‐paced difference in AV optimum may be physiological stimuli (e.g., adrenergic drive) advancing left atrial contraction during exercise but not with fast atrial pacing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60993782018-08-24 Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT Kyriacou, Andreas Rajkumar, Christopher A. Pabari, Punam A. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Willson, Keith Peters, Nicholas S. Lim, Phang B. Kanagaratnam, Prapa Hughes, Alun D. Mayet, Jamil Whinnett, Zachary I. Francis, Darrel P. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding how atrial activation mode and heart rate affect optimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We studied these questions using high‐reproducibility hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements. METHODS: Twenty patients were hemodynamically optimized using noninvasive beat‐to‐beat blood pressure at rest (62 ± 11 beats/min), during exercise (80 ± 6 beats/min), and at three atrially paced rates: 5, 25, and 45 beats/min above rest, denoted as A(paced,r+5), A(paced,r+25), and A(paced,r+45), respectively. Left atrial myocardial motion and transmitral flow were timed echocardiographically. RESULTS: During atrial sensing, raising heart rate shortened optimal AV delay by 25 ± 6 ms (P < 0.001). During atrial pacing, raising heart rate from A(paced,r+5) to A(paced,r+25) shortened it by 16 ± 6 ms; A(paced,r+45) shortened it 17 ± 6 ms further (P < 0.001). In comparison to atrial‐sensed activation, atrial pacing lengthened optimal AV delay by 76 ± 6 ms (P < 0.0001) at rest, and at ∼20 beats/min faster, by 85 ± 7 ms (P < 0.0001), 9 ± 4 ms more (P  =  0.017). Mechanically, atrial pacing delayed left atrial contraction by 63 ± 5 ms at rest and by 73 ± 5 ms (i.e., by 10 ± 5 ms more, P < 0.05) at ∼20 beats/min faster. Raising atrial rate by exercise advanced left atrial contraction by 7 ± 2 ms (P  =  0.001). Raising it by atrial pacing did not (P  =  0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic optimal AV delay shortens with elevation of heart rate. It lengthens on switching from atrial‐sensed to atrial‐paced at the same rate, and echocardiography shows this sensed‐paced difference in optima results from a sensed‐paced difference in atrial electromechanical delay. The reason for the widening of the sensed‐paced difference in AV optimum may be physiological stimuli (e.g., adrenergic drive) advancing left atrial contraction during exercise but not with fast atrial pacing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-22 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6099378/ /pubmed/29856077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13401 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Devices
Kyriacou, Andreas
Rajkumar, Christopher A.
Pabari, Punam A.
Sohaib, S.M. Afzal
Willson, Keith
Peters, Nicholas S.
Lim, Phang B.
Kanagaratnam, Prapa
Hughes, Alun D.
Mayet, Jamil
Whinnett, Zachary I.
Francis, Darrel P.
Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
title Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
title_full Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
title_fullStr Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
title_full_unstemmed Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
title_short Distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal AV delay in CRT
title_sort distinct impacts of heart rate and right atrial‐pacing on left atrial mechanical activation and optimal av delay in crt
topic Devices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29856077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13401
work_keys_str_mv AT kyriacouandreas distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT rajkumarchristophera distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT pabaripunama distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT sohaibsmafzal distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT willsonkeith distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT petersnicholass distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT limphangb distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT kanagaratnamprapa distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT hughesalund distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT mayetjamil distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT whinnettzacharyi distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt
AT francisdarrelp distinctimpactsofheartrateandrightatrialpacingonleftatrialmechanicalactivationandoptimalavdelayincrt