Cargando…

Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo

BACKGROUND: Recently, natural moisturizing factors (NMFs) and corneocyte surface topography were suggested as biomarkers for irritant dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate how exposure to different irritants influences corneocyte surface topography, NMF levels and the barrier function of human skin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soltanipoor, Maryam, Stilla, Tasja, Riethmüller, Christoph, Thyssen, Jacob P., Sluiter, Judith K., Rustemeyer, Thomas, Fischer, Tobias W., Kezic, Sanja, Angelova‐Fischer, Irena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.12981
_version_ 1783348663263690752
author Soltanipoor, Maryam
Stilla, Tasja
Riethmüller, Christoph
Thyssen, Jacob P.
Sluiter, Judith K.
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Fischer, Tobias W.
Kezic, Sanja
Angelova‐Fischer, Irena
author_facet Soltanipoor, Maryam
Stilla, Tasja
Riethmüller, Christoph
Thyssen, Jacob P.
Sluiter, Judith K.
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Fischer, Tobias W.
Kezic, Sanja
Angelova‐Fischer, Irena
author_sort Soltanipoor, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, natural moisturizing factors (NMFs) and corneocyte surface topography were suggested as biomarkers for irritant dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate how exposure to different irritants influences corneocyte surface topography, NMF levels and the barrier function of human skin in vivo. METHODS: Eight healthy adult volunteers were exposed to aqueous solutions of 60% n‐propanol, 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), 0.15% sodium hydroxide, and 2.0% acetic acid, and distilled water, in a repeated irritation test over a period of 96 hours. Erythema, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, the dermal texture index (DTI) and NMF levels were measured at baseline, and after 24 and 96 hours. RESULTS: SLS and sodium hydroxide had the most pronounced effects on erythema and TEWL. Although n‐propanol caused only slight changes in TEWL and erythema, it showed pronounced effects on skin hydration, NMF levels, and the DTI. NMF was the only parameter that was significantly altered by all investigated irritants. The changes in the DTI were inversely associated with NMF levels and skin hydration. CONCLUSION: Skin barrier impairment and the inflammatory response are irritant‐specific, emphasizing the need for a multiparametric approach to the study of skin irritation. NMF levels seem to be the most sensitive parameter in detecting irritant‐induced skin barrier alterations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60994302018-08-24 Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo Soltanipoor, Maryam Stilla, Tasja Riethmüller, Christoph Thyssen, Jacob P. Sluiter, Judith K. Rustemeyer, Thomas Fischer, Tobias W. Kezic, Sanja Angelova‐Fischer, Irena Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Recently, natural moisturizing factors (NMFs) and corneocyte surface topography were suggested as biomarkers for irritant dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate how exposure to different irritants influences corneocyte surface topography, NMF levels and the barrier function of human skin in vivo. METHODS: Eight healthy adult volunteers were exposed to aqueous solutions of 60% n‐propanol, 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), 0.15% sodium hydroxide, and 2.0% acetic acid, and distilled water, in a repeated irritation test over a period of 96 hours. Erythema, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, the dermal texture index (DTI) and NMF levels were measured at baseline, and after 24 and 96 hours. RESULTS: SLS and sodium hydroxide had the most pronounced effects on erythema and TEWL. Although n‐propanol caused only slight changes in TEWL and erythema, it showed pronounced effects on skin hydration, NMF levels, and the DTI. NMF was the only parameter that was significantly altered by all investigated irritants. The changes in the DTI were inversely associated with NMF levels and skin hydration. CONCLUSION: Skin barrier impairment and the inflammatory response are irritant‐specific, emphasizing the need for a multiparametric approach to the study of skin irritation. NMF levels seem to be the most sensitive parameter in detecting irritant‐induced skin barrier alterations. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018-04-02 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6099430/ /pubmed/29607504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.12981 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Soltanipoor, Maryam
Stilla, Tasja
Riethmüller, Christoph
Thyssen, Jacob P.
Sluiter, Judith K.
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Fischer, Tobias W.
Kezic, Sanja
Angelova‐Fischer, Irena
Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
title Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
title_full Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
title_fullStr Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
title_full_unstemmed Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
title_short Specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
title_sort specific barrier response profiles after experimentally induced skin irritation in vivo
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.12981
work_keys_str_mv AT soltanipoormaryam specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT stillatasja specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT riethmullerchristoph specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT thyssenjacobp specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT sluiterjudithk specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT rustemeyerthomas specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT fischertobiasw specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT kezicsanja specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo
AT angelovafischerirena specificbarrierresponseprofilesafterexperimentallyinducedskinirritationinvivo