Cargando…
Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird
Inbreeding depression plays a major role in shaping mating systems: in particular, inbreeding avoidance is often proposed as a mechanism explaining extra‐pair reproduction in socially monogamous species. This suggestion relies on assumptions that are rarely comprehensively tested: that inbreeding de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13496 |
_version_ | 1783348673368817664 |
---|---|
author | Hajduk, Gabriela K. Cockburn, Andrew Margraf, Nicolas Osmond, Helen L. Walling, Craig A. Kruuk, Loeske E. B. |
author_facet | Hajduk, Gabriela K. Cockburn, Andrew Margraf, Nicolas Osmond, Helen L. Walling, Craig A. Kruuk, Loeske E. B. |
author_sort | Hajduk, Gabriela K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inbreeding depression plays a major role in shaping mating systems: in particular, inbreeding avoidance is often proposed as a mechanism explaining extra‐pair reproduction in socially monogamous species. This suggestion relies on assumptions that are rarely comprehensively tested: that inbreeding depression is present, that higher kinship between social partners increases infidelity, and that infidelity reduces the frequency of inbreeding. Here, we test these assumptions using 26 years of data for a cooperatively breeding, socially monogamous bird with high female infidelity, the superb fairy‐wren (Malurus cyaneus). Although inbred individuals were rare (∼6% of offspring), we found evidence of inbreeding depression in nestling mass (but not in fledgling survival). Mother–son social pairings resulted in 100% infidelity, but kinship between a social pair did not otherwise predict female infidelity. Nevertheless, extra‐pair offspring were less likely to be inbred than within‐pair offspring. Finally, the social environment (the number of helpers in a group) did not affect offspring inbreeding coefficients or inbreeding depression levels. In conclusion, despite some agreement with the assumptions that are necessary for inbreeding avoidance to drive infidelity, the apparent scarcity of inbreeding events and the observed levels of inbreeding depression seem insufficient to explain the ubiquitous infidelity in this system, beyond the mother–son mating avoidance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6099473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60994732018-08-24 Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird Hajduk, Gabriela K. Cockburn, Andrew Margraf, Nicolas Osmond, Helen L. Walling, Craig A. Kruuk, Loeske E. B. Evolution Original Articles Inbreeding depression plays a major role in shaping mating systems: in particular, inbreeding avoidance is often proposed as a mechanism explaining extra‐pair reproduction in socially monogamous species. This suggestion relies on assumptions that are rarely comprehensively tested: that inbreeding depression is present, that higher kinship between social partners increases infidelity, and that infidelity reduces the frequency of inbreeding. Here, we test these assumptions using 26 years of data for a cooperatively breeding, socially monogamous bird with high female infidelity, the superb fairy‐wren (Malurus cyaneus). Although inbred individuals were rare (∼6% of offspring), we found evidence of inbreeding depression in nestling mass (but not in fledgling survival). Mother–son social pairings resulted in 100% infidelity, but kinship between a social pair did not otherwise predict female infidelity. Nevertheless, extra‐pair offspring were less likely to be inbred than within‐pair offspring. Finally, the social environment (the number of helpers in a group) did not affect offspring inbreeding coefficients or inbreeding depression levels. In conclusion, despite some agreement with the assumptions that are necessary for inbreeding avoidance to drive infidelity, the apparent scarcity of inbreeding events and the observed levels of inbreeding depression seem insufficient to explain the ubiquitous infidelity in this system, beyond the mother–son mating avoidance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-05 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6099473/ /pubmed/29761484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13496 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hajduk, Gabriela K. Cockburn, Andrew Margraf, Nicolas Osmond, Helen L. Walling, Craig A. Kruuk, Loeske E. B. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird |
title | Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird
|
title_full | Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird
|
title_fullStr | Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird
|
title_full_unstemmed | Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird
|
title_short | Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird
|
title_sort | inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hajdukgabrielak inbreedinginbreedingdepressionandinfidelityinacooperativelybreedingbird AT cockburnandrew inbreedinginbreedingdepressionandinfidelityinacooperativelybreedingbird AT margrafnicolas inbreedinginbreedingdepressionandinfidelityinacooperativelybreedingbird AT osmondhelenl inbreedinginbreedingdepressionandinfidelityinacooperativelybreedingbird AT wallingcraiga inbreedinginbreedingdepressionandinfidelityinacooperativelybreedingbird AT kruukloeskeeb inbreedinginbreedingdepressionandinfidelityinacooperativelybreedingbird |