Cargando…

Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop intra‐ocular diathermy forceps and test them on perfused porcine cadaver eyes. METHODS: We designed two types of 23‐gauge intra‐ocular bipolar diathermy forceps by modifying commercially available membrane peeling forceps. In the first type, the emit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Overdam, Koen A., Kilic, Emine, Verdijk, Robert M., Manning, Sonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13619
_version_ 1783348675773202432
author van Overdam, Koen A.
Kilic, Emine
Verdijk, Robert M.
Manning, Sonia
author_facet van Overdam, Koen A.
Kilic, Emine
Verdijk, Robert M.
Manning, Sonia
author_sort van Overdam, Koen A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop intra‐ocular diathermy forceps and test them on perfused porcine cadaver eyes. METHODS: We designed two types of 23‐gauge intra‐ocular bipolar diathermy forceps by modifying commercially available membrane peeling forceps. In the first type, the emitting electrode is connected to one‐half of the core and the return electrode to the other half, with one jaw of the forceps attached to each half. In the second type, the emitting electrode is attached to the core and both jaws of the forceps, and the return electrode to the surrounding tube. We compared the new diathermy forceps to conventional intra‐ocular diathermy, on perfused porcine cadaver eyes. First‐order retinal artery and vein closure was confirmed both by a perfusion study and by histology of the treated vessels. RESULTS: Type 1 diathermy forceps closed retinal arteries and veins more successfully (five of five and five of five successful treatments, respectively) than Type 2 diathermy forceps (five of five and four of five, respectively) and conventional diathermy (three of five and four of five, respectively). Less energy was used with Type 1 compared to Type 2 and conventional for artery closure (1.5 ± 0.0 versus 4.6 ± 3.3 versus 2.1 ± 0.8 joules, respectively) and vein closure (1.5 ± 0.0 versus 5.4 ± 4.6 versus 2.4 ± 0.8 joules, respectively). Histology of the treated vessels confirmed the perfusion study results. CONCLUSION: We designed two types of a new multifunctional intra‐ocular instrument with the ability to peel membranes and to grasp, compress and coagulate retinal blood vessels. Both types pose operational advantages compared to current conventional intra‐ocular diathermy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60994832018-08-24 Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps van Overdam, Koen A. Kilic, Emine Verdijk, Robert M. Manning, Sonia Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop intra‐ocular diathermy forceps and test them on perfused porcine cadaver eyes. METHODS: We designed two types of 23‐gauge intra‐ocular bipolar diathermy forceps by modifying commercially available membrane peeling forceps. In the first type, the emitting electrode is connected to one‐half of the core and the return electrode to the other half, with one jaw of the forceps attached to each half. In the second type, the emitting electrode is attached to the core and both jaws of the forceps, and the return electrode to the surrounding tube. We compared the new diathermy forceps to conventional intra‐ocular diathermy, on perfused porcine cadaver eyes. First‐order retinal artery and vein closure was confirmed both by a perfusion study and by histology of the treated vessels. RESULTS: Type 1 diathermy forceps closed retinal arteries and veins more successfully (five of five and five of five successful treatments, respectively) than Type 2 diathermy forceps (five of five and four of five, respectively) and conventional diathermy (three of five and four of five, respectively). Less energy was used with Type 1 compared to Type 2 and conventional for artery closure (1.5 ± 0.0 versus 4.6 ± 3.3 versus 2.1 ± 0.8 joules, respectively) and vein closure (1.5 ± 0.0 versus 5.4 ± 4.6 versus 2.4 ± 0.8 joules, respectively). Histology of the treated vessels confirmed the perfusion study results. CONCLUSION: We designed two types of a new multifunctional intra‐ocular instrument with the ability to peel membranes and to grasp, compress and coagulate retinal blood vessels. Both types pose operational advantages compared to current conventional intra‐ocular diathermy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-02 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6099483/ /pubmed/29197159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13619 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Overdam, Koen A.
Kilic, Emine
Verdijk, Robert M.
Manning, Sonia
Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
title Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
title_full Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
title_fullStr Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
title_full_unstemmed Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
title_short Intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
title_sort intra‐ocular diathermy forceps
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13619
work_keys_str_mv AT vanoverdamkoena intraoculardiathermyforceps
AT kilicemine intraoculardiathermyforceps
AT verdijkrobertm intraoculardiathermyforceps
AT manningsonia intraoculardiathermyforceps