Cargando…

Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse

Functional connectivity, quantified using landscape genetics, can inform conservation through the identification of factors linking genetic structure to landscape mechanisms. We used breeding habitat metrics, landscape attributes, and indices of grouse abundance, to compare fit between structural co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Row, Jeffrey R., Doherty, Kevin E., Cross, Todd B., Schwartz, Michael K., Oyler‐McCance, Sara J., Naugle, Dave E., Knick, Steven T., Fedy, Bradley C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12627
_version_ 1783348749729267712
author Row, Jeffrey R.
Doherty, Kevin E.
Cross, Todd B.
Schwartz, Michael K.
Oyler‐McCance, Sara J.
Naugle, Dave E.
Knick, Steven T.
Fedy, Bradley C.
author_facet Row, Jeffrey R.
Doherty, Kevin E.
Cross, Todd B.
Schwartz, Michael K.
Oyler‐McCance, Sara J.
Naugle, Dave E.
Knick, Steven T.
Fedy, Bradley C.
author_sort Row, Jeffrey R.
collection PubMed
description Functional connectivity, quantified using landscape genetics, can inform conservation through the identification of factors linking genetic structure to landscape mechanisms. We used breeding habitat metrics, landscape attributes, and indices of grouse abundance, to compare fit between structural connectivity and genetic differentiation within five long‐established Sage‐Grouse Management Zones (MZ) I‐V using microsatellite genotypes from 6,844 greater sage‐grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) collected across their 10.7 million‐km(2) range. We estimated structural connectivity using a circuit theory‐based approach where we built resistance surfaces using thresholds dividing the landscape into “habitat” and “nonhabitat” and nodes were clusters of sage‐grouse leks (where feather samples were collected using noninvasive techniques). As hypothesized, MZ‐specific habitat metrics were the best predictors of differentiation. To our surprise, inclusion of grouse abundance‐corrected indices did not greatly improve model fit in most MZs. Functional connectivity of breeding habitat was reduced when probability of lek occurrence dropped below 0.25 (MZs I, IV) and 0.5 (II), thresholds lower than those previously identified as required for the formation of breeding leks, which suggests that individuals are willing to travel through undesirable habitat. The individual MZ landscape results suggested terrain roughness and steepness shaped functional connectivity across all MZs. Across respective MZs, sagebrush availability (<10%–30%; II, IV, V), tree canopy cover (>10%; I, II, IV), and cultivation (>25%; I, II, IV, V) each reduced movement beyond their respective thresholds. Model validations confirmed variation in predictive ability across MZs with top resistance surfaces better predicting gene flow than geographic distance alone, especially in cases of low and high differentiation among lek groups. The resultant resistance maps we produced spatially depict the strength and redundancy of range‐wide gene flow and can help direct conservation actions to maintain and restore functional connectivity for sage‐grouse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60998272018-08-27 Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse Row, Jeffrey R. Doherty, Kevin E. Cross, Todd B. Schwartz, Michael K. Oyler‐McCance, Sara J. Naugle, Dave E. Knick, Steven T. Fedy, Bradley C. Evol Appl Original Articles Functional connectivity, quantified using landscape genetics, can inform conservation through the identification of factors linking genetic structure to landscape mechanisms. We used breeding habitat metrics, landscape attributes, and indices of grouse abundance, to compare fit between structural connectivity and genetic differentiation within five long‐established Sage‐Grouse Management Zones (MZ) I‐V using microsatellite genotypes from 6,844 greater sage‐grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) collected across their 10.7 million‐km(2) range. We estimated structural connectivity using a circuit theory‐based approach where we built resistance surfaces using thresholds dividing the landscape into “habitat” and “nonhabitat” and nodes were clusters of sage‐grouse leks (where feather samples were collected using noninvasive techniques). As hypothesized, MZ‐specific habitat metrics were the best predictors of differentiation. To our surprise, inclusion of grouse abundance‐corrected indices did not greatly improve model fit in most MZs. Functional connectivity of breeding habitat was reduced when probability of lek occurrence dropped below 0.25 (MZs I, IV) and 0.5 (II), thresholds lower than those previously identified as required for the formation of breeding leks, which suggests that individuals are willing to travel through undesirable habitat. The individual MZ landscape results suggested terrain roughness and steepness shaped functional connectivity across all MZs. Across respective MZs, sagebrush availability (<10%–30%; II, IV, V), tree canopy cover (>10%; I, II, IV), and cultivation (>25%; I, II, IV, V) each reduced movement beyond their respective thresholds. Model validations confirmed variation in predictive ability across MZs with top resistance surfaces better predicting gene flow than geographic distance alone, especially in cases of low and high differentiation among lek groups. The resultant resistance maps we produced spatially depict the strength and redundancy of range‐wide gene flow and can help direct conservation actions to maintain and restore functional connectivity for sage‐grouse. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6099827/ /pubmed/30151042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12627 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Row, Jeffrey R.
Doherty, Kevin E.
Cross, Todd B.
Schwartz, Michael K.
Oyler‐McCance, Sara J.
Naugle, Dave E.
Knick, Steven T.
Fedy, Bradley C.
Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
title Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
title_full Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
title_fullStr Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
title_short Quantifying functional connectivity: The role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
title_sort quantifying functional connectivity: the role of breeding habitat, abundance, and landscape features on range‐wide gene flow in sage‐grouse
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12627
work_keys_str_mv AT rowjeffreyr quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT dohertykevine quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT crosstoddb quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT schwartzmichaelk quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT oylermccancesaraj quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT naugledavee quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT knickstevent quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse
AT fedybradleyc quantifyingfunctionalconnectivitytheroleofbreedinghabitatabundanceandlandscapefeaturesonrangewidegeneflowinsagegrouse