Cargando…

No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status

Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Benedict C., Hahn, Amanda C., Fisher, Claire I., Wang, Hongyi, Kandrik, Michal, Han, Chengyang, Fasolt, Vanessa, Morrison, Danielle, Lee, Anthony J., Holzleitner, Iris J., O’Shea, Kieran J., Roberts, S. Craig, Little, Anthony C., DeBruine, Lisa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197
_version_ 1783348775701446656
author Jones, Benedict C.
Hahn, Amanda C.
Fisher, Claire I.
Wang, Hongyi
Kandrik, Michal
Han, Chengyang
Fasolt, Vanessa
Morrison, Danielle
Lee, Anthony J.
Holzleitner, Iris J.
O’Shea, Kieran J.
Roberts, S. Craig
Little, Anthony C.
DeBruine, Lisa M.
author_facet Jones, Benedict C.
Hahn, Amanda C.
Fisher, Claire I.
Wang, Hongyi
Kandrik, Michal
Han, Chengyang
Fasolt, Vanessa
Morrison, Danielle
Lee, Anthony J.
Holzleitner, Iris J.
O’Shea, Kieran J.
Roberts, S. Craig
Little, Anthony C.
DeBruine, Lisa M.
author_sort Jones, Benedict C.
collection PubMed
description Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest-ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women’s preferences for facial masculinity (N = 584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women’s salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subjects and between-subjects comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men’s faces, particularly when assessing men’s attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women’s preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6099988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60999882018-08-28 No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status Jones, Benedict C. Hahn, Amanda C. Fisher, Claire I. Wang, Hongyi Kandrik, Michal Han, Chengyang Fasolt, Vanessa Morrison, Danielle Lee, Anthony J. Holzleitner, Iris J. O’Shea, Kieran J. Roberts, S. Craig Little, Anthony C. DeBruine, Lisa M. Psychol Sci Research Articles Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest-ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women’s preferences for facial masculinity (N = 584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women’s salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subjects and between-subjects comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men’s faces, particularly when assessing men’s attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women’s preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status. SAGE Publications 2018-04-30 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6099988/ /pubmed/29708849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jones, Benedict C.
Hahn, Amanda C.
Fisher, Claire I.
Wang, Hongyi
Kandrik, Michal
Han, Chengyang
Fasolt, Vanessa
Morrison, Danielle
Lee, Anthony J.
Holzleitner, Iris J.
O’Shea, Kieran J.
Roberts, S. Craig
Little, Anthony C.
DeBruine, Lisa M.
No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
title No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
title_full No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
title_fullStr No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
title_full_unstemmed No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
title_short No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
title_sort no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesbenedictc nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT hahnamandac nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT fisherclairei nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT wanghongyi nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT kandrikmichal nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT hanchengyang nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT fasoltvanessa nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT morrisondanielle nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT leeanthonyj nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT holzleitneririsj nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT osheakieranj nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT robertsscraig nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT littleanthonyc nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus
AT debruinelisam nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus