Cargando…
No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status
Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197 |
_version_ | 1783348775701446656 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Benedict C. Hahn, Amanda C. Fisher, Claire I. Wang, Hongyi Kandrik, Michal Han, Chengyang Fasolt, Vanessa Morrison, Danielle Lee, Anthony J. Holzleitner, Iris J. O’Shea, Kieran J. Roberts, S. Craig Little, Anthony C. DeBruine, Lisa M. |
author_facet | Jones, Benedict C. Hahn, Amanda C. Fisher, Claire I. Wang, Hongyi Kandrik, Michal Han, Chengyang Fasolt, Vanessa Morrison, Danielle Lee, Anthony J. Holzleitner, Iris J. O’Shea, Kieran J. Roberts, S. Craig Little, Anthony C. DeBruine, Lisa M. |
author_sort | Jones, Benedict C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest-ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women’s preferences for facial masculinity (N = 584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women’s salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subjects and between-subjects comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men’s faces, particularly when assessing men’s attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women’s preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6099988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60999882018-08-28 No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status Jones, Benedict C. Hahn, Amanda C. Fisher, Claire I. Wang, Hongyi Kandrik, Michal Han, Chengyang Fasolt, Vanessa Morrison, Danielle Lee, Anthony J. Holzleitner, Iris J. O’Shea, Kieran J. Roberts, S. Craig Little, Anthony C. DeBruine, Lisa M. Psychol Sci Research Articles Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces are related to women’s hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest-ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women’s preferences for facial masculinity (N = 584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women’s salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subjects and between-subjects comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men’s faces, particularly when assessing men’s attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women’s preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status. SAGE Publications 2018-04-30 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6099988/ /pubmed/29708849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Jones, Benedict C. Hahn, Amanda C. Fisher, Claire I. Wang, Hongyi Kandrik, Michal Han, Chengyang Fasolt, Vanessa Morrison, Danielle Lee, Anthony J. Holzleitner, Iris J. O’Shea, Kieran J. Roberts, S. Craig Little, Anthony C. DeBruine, Lisa M. No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status |
title | No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status |
title_full | No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status |
title_fullStr | No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status |
title_full_unstemmed | No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status |
title_short | No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status |
title_sort | no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6099988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesbenedictc nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT hahnamandac nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT fisherclairei nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT wanghongyi nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT kandrikmichal nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT hanchengyang nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT fasoltvanessa nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT morrisondanielle nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT leeanthonyj nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT holzleitneririsj nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT osheakieranj nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT robertsscraig nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT littleanthonyc nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus AT debruinelisam nocompellingevidencethatpreferencesforfacialmasculinitytrackchangesinwomenshormonalstatus |