Cargando…

Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness

BACKGROUND: The consistently observed male predominance of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) has raised concerns about gender-based disparities in ICU access. Comparing rates of ICU admission requires choosing a normalizing factor (denominator), and the denominator usually used to compare such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garland, Allan, Olafson, Kendiss, Ramsey, Clare D., Yogendranc, Marina, Fransoo, Randall
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6100704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2132-8
_version_ 1783348933088509952
author Garland, Allan
Olafson, Kendiss
Ramsey, Clare D.
Yogendranc, Marina
Fransoo, Randall
author_facet Garland, Allan
Olafson, Kendiss
Ramsey, Clare D.
Yogendranc, Marina
Fransoo, Randall
author_sort Garland, Allan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The consistently observed male predominance of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) has raised concerns about gender-based disparities in ICU access. Comparing rates of ICU admission requires choosing a normalizing factor (denominator), and the denominator usually used to compare such rates between subpopulations is the size of those subpopulations. However, the appropriate denominator is the number of people whose medical condition warranted ICU care. We devised an estimate of the number of critically ill people in the general population, and used it to compare rates of ICU admission by gender and income. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective analysis included all adults in the Canadian province of Manitoba, 2004–2015. We created an estimate for the number of critically ill people who warrant ICU care, and used it as the denominator to generate critical illness-normalized rates of ICU admission. These were compared to the usual population-normalized rates of ICU care. RESULTS: Men outnumbered women in ICUs for all age groups; population-normalized male:female rate ratios significantly exceed 0 for every age group, ranging from 1.15 to 2.10. Using critical-illness normalized rates, this male predominance largely disappeared; critically ill men and women aged 45–74 years were admitted in equivalent proportions (critical-illness normalized rate ratios 0.96–1.01). While population-normalized rates of ICU care were higher in lower income strata (p < 0.001), the gradient for critical illness-based rates was reversed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across a 30-year adult age span, the male predominance of ICU patients was accounted for by higher estimated rates of critical illness among men. People in lower income strata had lower critical-illness normalized rates of ICU admission. Our methods highlight that correct inferences about access to healthcare require calculating rates using denominators appropriate for this purpose. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2132-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6100704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61007042018-08-27 Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness Garland, Allan Olafson, Kendiss Ramsey, Clare D. Yogendranc, Marina Fransoo, Randall Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The consistently observed male predominance of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) has raised concerns about gender-based disparities in ICU access. Comparing rates of ICU admission requires choosing a normalizing factor (denominator), and the denominator usually used to compare such rates between subpopulations is the size of those subpopulations. However, the appropriate denominator is the number of people whose medical condition warranted ICU care. We devised an estimate of the number of critically ill people in the general population, and used it to compare rates of ICU admission by gender and income. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective analysis included all adults in the Canadian province of Manitoba, 2004–2015. We created an estimate for the number of critically ill people who warrant ICU care, and used it as the denominator to generate critical illness-normalized rates of ICU admission. These were compared to the usual population-normalized rates of ICU care. RESULTS: Men outnumbered women in ICUs for all age groups; population-normalized male:female rate ratios significantly exceed 0 for every age group, ranging from 1.15 to 2.10. Using critical-illness normalized rates, this male predominance largely disappeared; critically ill men and women aged 45–74 years were admitted in equivalent proportions (critical-illness normalized rate ratios 0.96–1.01). While population-normalized rates of ICU care were higher in lower income strata (p < 0.001), the gradient for critical illness-based rates was reversed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across a 30-year adult age span, the male predominance of ICU patients was accounted for by higher estimated rates of critical illness among men. People in lower income strata had lower critical-illness normalized rates of ICU admission. Our methods highlight that correct inferences about access to healthcare require calculating rates using denominators appropriate for this purpose. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2132-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6100704/ /pubmed/30122152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2132-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Garland, Allan
Olafson, Kendiss
Ramsey, Clare D.
Yogendranc, Marina
Fransoo, Randall
Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
title Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
title_full Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
title_fullStr Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
title_full_unstemmed Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
title_short Reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
title_sort reassessing access to intensive care using an estimate of the population incidence of critical illness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6100704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2132-8
work_keys_str_mv AT garlandallan reassessingaccesstointensivecareusinganestimateofthepopulationincidenceofcriticalillness
AT olafsonkendiss reassessingaccesstointensivecareusinganestimateofthepopulationincidenceofcriticalillness
AT ramseyclared reassessingaccesstointensivecareusinganestimateofthepopulationincidenceofcriticalillness
AT yogendrancmarina reassessingaccesstointensivecareusinganestimateofthepopulationincidenceofcriticalillness
AT fransoorandall reassessingaccesstointensivecareusinganestimateofthepopulationincidenceofcriticalillness