Cargando…

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

The partners of each pair must be able to pass the McGill Friendship Questionnaire without communicating. Each partner is then seated in front of a screen in one of two adjacent rooms. These rooms are separated by a glass window through which participants communicate to maintain feelings of together...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tardif, Amanda, Chau-Morris, Ashley, Wang, Zi Yue, Takahara, Ehime, Hadjis, Tim, Debruille, Jean, Debruille, J. Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MyJove Corporation 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6101434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/56120
_version_ 1783349020347858944
author Tardif, Amanda
Chau-Morris, Ashley
Wang, Zi Yue
Takahara, Ehime
Hadjis, Tim
Debruille, Jean
Debruille, J. Bruno
author_facet Tardif, Amanda
Chau-Morris, Ashley
Wang, Zi Yue
Takahara, Ehime
Hadjis, Tim
Debruille, Jean
Debruille, J. Bruno
author_sort Tardif, Amanda
collection PubMed
description The partners of each pair must be able to pass the McGill Friendship Questionnaire without communicating. Each partner is then seated in front of a screen in one of two adjacent rooms. These rooms are separated by a glass window through which participants communicate to maintain feelings of togetherness while being fitted with the EEG cap. After checking for adequate EEG signals, the glass is covered by a curtain to prevent visual communication. Then, partners must be silent but are instructed to try to feel in the presence of their partner during the entire experiment. Just before it starts, participants are told that each of them will be presented with one image at a time and that these images will occur at the same time for both of them on their own screen. They are also instructed that, for each trial, the simultaneous images will always be different. However, unbeknownst to them, trials are randomized: only half of them are consistent with this instruction and actually include two different images. These trials form the DSC, that is, the different-stimuli condition. The other half of the trials are inconsistent with the instruction. They include two identical images and form the ISC (identical-stimuli condition). After the experiment, participants are sorted into two groups: those who reported that they felt in the presence of their partner during the majority of the trials and those who reported they did not. The impact of the stimulus processing of the partner is found by subtracting the mean voltages of the ERPs of the ISC (inconsistent with the instructions) from the ERPs of the DSC (consistent with the instructions) in at least two time windows (TWs): firstly, in the 75 to 150 ms TW, where the absolute values of these subtractions are greater, especially at right frontal sites, in those who felt in the presence of their partner than in those who did not; secondly, in the LPP time window (i.e., from 650 to 950 ms post onset), where ERPs are significantly less positive in the DSC than in the ISC in those in whom the raw results of the early (75-150ms) subtractions are negative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6101434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MyJove Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61014342018-09-11 How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners Tardif, Amanda Chau-Morris, Ashley Wang, Zi Yue Takahara, Ehime Hadjis, Tim Debruille, Jean Debruille, J. Bruno J Vis Exp This Month in JoVE The partners of each pair must be able to pass the McGill Friendship Questionnaire without communicating. Each partner is then seated in front of a screen in one of two adjacent rooms. These rooms are separated by a glass window through which participants communicate to maintain feelings of togetherness while being fitted with the EEG cap. After checking for adequate EEG signals, the glass is covered by a curtain to prevent visual communication. Then, partners must be silent but are instructed to try to feel in the presence of their partner during the entire experiment. Just before it starts, participants are told that each of them will be presented with one image at a time and that these images will occur at the same time for both of them on their own screen. They are also instructed that, for each trial, the simultaneous images will always be different. However, unbeknownst to them, trials are randomized: only half of them are consistent with this instruction and actually include two different images. These trials form the DSC, that is, the different-stimuli condition. The other half of the trials are inconsistent with the instruction. They include two identical images and form the ISC (identical-stimuli condition). After the experiment, participants are sorted into two groups: those who reported that they felt in the presence of their partner during the majority of the trials and those who reported they did not. The impact of the stimulus processing of the partner is found by subtracting the mean voltages of the ERPs of the ISC (inconsistent with the instructions) from the ERPs of the DSC (consistent with the instructions) in at least two time windows (TWs): firstly, in the 75 to 150 ms TW, where the absolute values of these subtractions are greater, especially at right frontal sites, in those who felt in the presence of their partner than in those who did not; secondly, in the LPP time window (i.e., from 650 to 950 ms post onset), where ERPs are significantly less positive in the DSC than in the ISC in those in whom the raw results of the early (75-150ms) subtractions are negative. MyJove Corporation 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6101434/ /pubmed/29912195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/56120 Text en Copyright © 2018, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle This Month in JoVE
Tardif, Amanda
Chau-Morris, Ashley
Wang, Zi Yue
Takahara, Ehime
Hadjis, Tim
Debruille, Jean
Debruille, J. Bruno
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
title How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
title_full How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
title_fullStr How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
title_full_unstemmed How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
title_short How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
title_sort how to find effects of stimulus processing on event related brain potentials of close others when hyperscanning partners
topic This Month in JoVE
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6101434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/56120
work_keys_str_mv AT tardifamanda howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners
AT chaumorrisashley howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners
AT wangziyue howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners
AT takaharaehime howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners
AT hadjistim howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners
AT debruillejean howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners
AT debruillejbruno howtofindeffectsofstimulusprocessingoneventrelatedbrainpotentialsofcloseotherswhenhyperscanningpartners