Cargando…

The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk

Background  A growing body of research is indicating that the tibial slope and the geometry of the tibiofemoral meniscal–cartilage interface may affect the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure. Increased lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) and reduced meniscal bone angl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauer, Steffen, English, Robert, Clatworthy, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668111
_version_ 1783349098349330432
author Sauer, Steffen
English, Robert
Clatworthy, Mark
author_facet Sauer, Steffen
English, Robert
Clatworthy, Mark
author_sort Sauer, Steffen
collection PubMed
description Background  A growing body of research is indicating that the tibial slope and the geometry of the tibiofemoral meniscal–cartilage interface may affect the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure. Increased lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) and reduced meniscal bone angle (MBA) are associated with increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The significance of a LTPS–MBA ratio regarding the prediction of ACL failure risk remains unknown. As LTPS and MBA may eventually potentiate or neutralize each other, it is expected that a low LTPS–MBA ratio is associated with high chance of ACL graft survival while a high LTPS–MBA ratio is associated with high risk of ACL failure. Material and Methods  Out of 1,487 consecutive patients who underwent hamstring ACLR between August 2000 and May 2013, 54 ACLR failures with intact lateral menisci were included in this study and matched one-to-one with 54 control participants by age, sex, graft, surgical technique, and graft fixation method. Control participants had undergone ACLR without signs of lateral meniscal injury, graft failure, or insufficiency. MBA and LTPS were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging. Logistic regression was used to identify LTPS/MBA key cut-off ratios. Results  In this cohort, a LTPS–MBA ratio under 0.27 was associated with a 28% risk of ACLR failure (36% of patients), while a ratio exceeding 0.42 was associated with an 82% risk of ACLR failure (31% of patients). The odds of ACL failure increased by 22.3% per reduction of 1 degree in MBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% limits, 1.1–1.34). No significant association was found between LTPS and the risk of ACL graft failure in transtibial ACLR, while the odds of ACL failure increased by 34.9% per degree of increasing LTPS in transportal ACLR (OR, 1.34; 95% limits, 1.01–1.79). No significant correlation was found between MBA and LTPS ( p  = 0.5). Conclusion  Reduced MBA was associated with significantly increased risk of ACL graft failure. A ratio of LTPS and MBA was found to be useful for the prediction of ACLR failure risk and may preoperatively help to identify patients at high risk of ACLR failure. This may have implications for patient counseling and the indication of additional extra-articular stabilizing procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61021152018-08-21 The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk Sauer, Steffen English, Robert Clatworthy, Mark Surg J (N Y) Background  A growing body of research is indicating that the tibial slope and the geometry of the tibiofemoral meniscal–cartilage interface may affect the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure. Increased lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) and reduced meniscal bone angle (MBA) are associated with increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The significance of a LTPS–MBA ratio regarding the prediction of ACL failure risk remains unknown. As LTPS and MBA may eventually potentiate or neutralize each other, it is expected that a low LTPS–MBA ratio is associated with high chance of ACL graft survival while a high LTPS–MBA ratio is associated with high risk of ACL failure. Material and Methods  Out of 1,487 consecutive patients who underwent hamstring ACLR between August 2000 and May 2013, 54 ACLR failures with intact lateral menisci were included in this study and matched one-to-one with 54 control participants by age, sex, graft, surgical technique, and graft fixation method. Control participants had undergone ACLR without signs of lateral meniscal injury, graft failure, or insufficiency. MBA and LTPS were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging. Logistic regression was used to identify LTPS/MBA key cut-off ratios. Results  In this cohort, a LTPS–MBA ratio under 0.27 was associated with a 28% risk of ACLR failure (36% of patients), while a ratio exceeding 0.42 was associated with an 82% risk of ACLR failure (31% of patients). The odds of ACL failure increased by 22.3% per reduction of 1 degree in MBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% limits, 1.1–1.34). No significant association was found between LTPS and the risk of ACL graft failure in transtibial ACLR, while the odds of ACL failure increased by 34.9% per degree of increasing LTPS in transportal ACLR (OR, 1.34; 95% limits, 1.01–1.79). No significant correlation was found between MBA and LTPS ( p  = 0.5). Conclusion  Reduced MBA was associated with significantly increased risk of ACL graft failure. A ratio of LTPS and MBA was found to be useful for the prediction of ACLR failure risk and may preoperatively help to identify patients at high risk of ACLR failure. This may have implications for patient counseling and the indication of additional extra-articular stabilizing procedures. Thieme Medical Publishers 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6102115/ /pubmed/30131976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668111 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sauer, Steffen
English, Robert
Clatworthy, Mark
The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk
title The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk
title_full The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk
title_fullStr The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk
title_full_unstemmed The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk
title_short The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk
title_sort ratio of tibial slope and meniscal bone angle for the prediction of acl reconstruction failure risk
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668111
work_keys_str_mv AT sauersteffen theratiooftibialslopeandmeniscalboneangleforthepredictionofaclreconstructionfailurerisk
AT englishrobert theratiooftibialslopeandmeniscalboneangleforthepredictionofaclreconstructionfailurerisk
AT clatworthymark theratiooftibialslopeandmeniscalboneangleforthepredictionofaclreconstructionfailurerisk
AT sauersteffen ratiooftibialslopeandmeniscalboneangleforthepredictionofaclreconstructionfailurerisk
AT englishrobert ratiooftibialslopeandmeniscalboneangleforthepredictionofaclreconstructionfailurerisk
AT clatworthymark ratiooftibialslopeandmeniscalboneangleforthepredictionofaclreconstructionfailurerisk