Cargando…
Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
BACKGROUND: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadrupled semitendinosus (Quad ST) grafts have potential advantages over doubled semitendinosus–gracilis (ST/G) including larger diameter and gracilis preservation, however the ideal tibial fixation method of the resultant shorter Quad ST gr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x |
_version_ | 1783349100706529280 |
---|---|
author | Vertullo, Christopher J. Cadman, Joseph Dabirrahmani, Dané Appleyard, Richard |
author_facet | Vertullo, Christopher J. Cadman, Joseph Dabirrahmani, Dané Appleyard, Richard |
author_sort | Vertullo, Christopher J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadrupled semitendinosus (Quad ST) grafts have potential advantages over doubled semitendinosus–gracilis (ST/G) including larger diameter and gracilis preservation, however the ideal tibial fixation method of the resultant shorter Quad ST graft remains elusive if a fixed-loop suspensory fixation device is used on the femur. We investigated whether the tibial fixation biomechanical properties of a Quad ST fixed indirectly with polyethylene terephthalate tape tied over a screw in a full outside-in created tunnel was superior to a ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a controlled laboratory study, six cadaveric matched pairs of each construct were subjected to cyclic loading to mimic physiologic loading during rehabilitation. This included preconditioning cycling, cyclic loading to 220 N for 500 cycles, then cyclic loading to 500 N for 500 cycles. RESULTS: High standard deviations across the measured parameters occurred with no significant difference between measured parameters of elongation for the different constructs. Elongation of the Quad-ST construct was greater at 10 and 100 cycles, but not statistically different. Four of the six Quad-ST constructs failed below 100 cycles, compared with two failures below 100 cycles in the ST/G construct. There was a strong correlation between cycles to failure and bone mineral density for the Quad ST-tape constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial fixation of Quad ST with a tied tape–screw construct in a full-length tunnel was not biomechanically superior to ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw, exhibited greater nonsignificant construct elongation with earlier failure, and was more reliant on bone mineral density. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: In vitro laboratory study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6102157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61021572018-08-23 Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison Vertullo, Christopher J. Cadman, Joseph Dabirrahmani, Dané Appleyard, Richard J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadrupled semitendinosus (Quad ST) grafts have potential advantages over doubled semitendinosus–gracilis (ST/G) including larger diameter and gracilis preservation, however the ideal tibial fixation method of the resultant shorter Quad ST graft remains elusive if a fixed-loop suspensory fixation device is used on the femur. We investigated whether the tibial fixation biomechanical properties of a Quad ST fixed indirectly with polyethylene terephthalate tape tied over a screw in a full outside-in created tunnel was superior to a ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a controlled laboratory study, six cadaveric matched pairs of each construct were subjected to cyclic loading to mimic physiologic loading during rehabilitation. This included preconditioning cycling, cyclic loading to 220 N for 500 cycles, then cyclic loading to 500 N for 500 cycles. RESULTS: High standard deviations across the measured parameters occurred with no significant difference between measured parameters of elongation for the different constructs. Elongation of the Quad-ST construct was greater at 10 and 100 cycles, but not statistically different. Four of the six Quad-ST constructs failed below 100 cycles, compared with two failures below 100 cycles in the ST/G construct. There was a strong correlation between cycles to failure and bone mineral density for the Quad ST-tape constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial fixation of Quad ST with a tied tape–screw construct in a full-length tunnel was not biomechanically superior to ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw, exhibited greater nonsignificant construct elongation with earlier failure, and was more reliant on bone mineral density. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: In vitro laboratory study. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-21 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6102157/ /pubmed/30128979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vertullo, Christopher J. Cadman, Joseph Dabirrahmani, Dané Appleyard, Richard Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
title | Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
title_full | Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
title_fullStr | Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
title_short | Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
title_sort | can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? a matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vertullochristopherj cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison AT cadmanjoseph cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison AT dabirrahmanidane cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison AT appleyardrichard cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison |