Cargando…

Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison

BACKGROUND: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadrupled semitendinosus (Quad ST) grafts have potential advantages over doubled semitendinosus–gracilis (ST/G) including larger diameter and gracilis preservation, however the ideal tibial fixation method of the resultant shorter Quad ST gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vertullo, Christopher J., Cadman, Joseph, Dabirrahmani, Dané, Appleyard, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x
_version_ 1783349100706529280
author Vertullo, Christopher J.
Cadman, Joseph
Dabirrahmani, Dané
Appleyard, Richard
author_facet Vertullo, Christopher J.
Cadman, Joseph
Dabirrahmani, Dané
Appleyard, Richard
author_sort Vertullo, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadrupled semitendinosus (Quad ST) grafts have potential advantages over doubled semitendinosus–gracilis (ST/G) including larger diameter and gracilis preservation, however the ideal tibial fixation method of the resultant shorter Quad ST graft remains elusive if a fixed-loop suspensory fixation device is used on the femur. We investigated whether the tibial fixation biomechanical properties of a Quad ST fixed indirectly with polyethylene terephthalate tape tied over a screw in a full outside-in created tunnel was superior to a ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a controlled laboratory study, six cadaveric matched pairs of each construct were subjected to cyclic loading to mimic physiologic loading during rehabilitation. This included preconditioning cycling, cyclic loading to 220 N for 500 cycles, then cyclic loading to 500 N for 500 cycles. RESULTS: High standard deviations across the measured parameters occurred with no significant difference between measured parameters of elongation for the different constructs. Elongation of the Quad-ST construct was greater at 10 and 100 cycles, but not statistically different. Four of the six Quad-ST constructs failed below 100 cycles, compared with two failures below 100 cycles in the ST/G construct. There was a strong correlation between cycles to failure and bone mineral density for the Quad ST-tape constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial fixation of Quad ST with a tied tape–screw construct in a full-length tunnel was not biomechanically superior to ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw, exhibited greater nonsignificant construct elongation with earlier failure, and was more reliant on bone mineral density. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: In vitro laboratory study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61021572018-08-23 Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison Vertullo, Christopher J. Cadman, Joseph Dabirrahmani, Dané Appleyard, Richard J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadrupled semitendinosus (Quad ST) grafts have potential advantages over doubled semitendinosus–gracilis (ST/G) including larger diameter and gracilis preservation, however the ideal tibial fixation method of the resultant shorter Quad ST graft remains elusive if a fixed-loop suspensory fixation device is used on the femur. We investigated whether the tibial fixation biomechanical properties of a Quad ST fixed indirectly with polyethylene terephthalate tape tied over a screw in a full outside-in created tunnel was superior to a ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a controlled laboratory study, six cadaveric matched pairs of each construct were subjected to cyclic loading to mimic physiologic loading during rehabilitation. This included preconditioning cycling, cyclic loading to 220 N for 500 cycles, then cyclic loading to 500 N for 500 cycles. RESULTS: High standard deviations across the measured parameters occurred with no significant difference between measured parameters of elongation for the different constructs. Elongation of the Quad-ST construct was greater at 10 and 100 cycles, but not statistically different. Four of the six Quad-ST constructs failed below 100 cycles, compared with two failures below 100 cycles in the ST/G construct. There was a strong correlation between cycles to failure and bone mineral density for the Quad ST-tape constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial fixation of Quad ST with a tied tape–screw construct in a full-length tunnel was not biomechanically superior to ST/G graft fixed with an interference screw, exhibited greater nonsignificant construct elongation with earlier failure, and was more reliant on bone mineral density. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: In vitro laboratory study. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-21 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6102157/ /pubmed/30128979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vertullo, Christopher J.
Cadman, Joseph
Dabirrahmani, Dané
Appleyard, Richard
Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
title Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
title_full Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
title_fullStr Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
title_full_unstemmed Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
title_short Can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
title_sort can tape–screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus–gracilis held with an interference screw? a matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vertullochristopherj cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison
AT cadmanjoseph cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison
AT dabirrahmanidane cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison
AT appleyardrichard cantapescrewfixationofaquadrupledsemitendinosusgraftinafulllengthtibialtunnelprovidesuperiorfixationcomparedwithadoubledsemitendinosusgracilisheldwithaninterferencescrewamatchedpaircadavericbiomechanicalcomparison