Cargando…

Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners

BACKGROUND: CrossFit® practitioners commonly track progress by monitoring their ability to complete a variety of standardized benchmark workouts within a typical class setting. However, objective assessment of progress is challenging because normative data does not currently exist for any of these b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangine, Gerald T., Cebulla, Brant, Feito, Yuri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0156-x
_version_ 1783349101179437056
author Mangine, Gerald T.
Cebulla, Brant
Feito, Yuri
author_facet Mangine, Gerald T.
Cebulla, Brant
Feito, Yuri
author_sort Mangine, Gerald T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CrossFit® practitioners commonly track progress by monitoring their ability to complete a variety of standardized benchmark workouts within a typical class setting. However, objective assessment of progress is challenging because normative data does not currently exist for any of these benchmark workouts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop normative values for five common benchmark workouts (i.e., Fran, Grace, Helen, Filthy-50 [F50], and Fight-Gone-Bad [FGB]). METHODS: Performance data from 133,857 male ((M)) and female ((F)) profiles located on a publicly available website were collected and sorted by sex (i.e., male [(M)] and female [(F)]) and competitive age classification (i.e., teen [T], individual [I], or masters [M]) and screened for errors. Subsequently, 10,000 valid profiles were randomly selected for analysis. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations were calculated for each category for Fran (I(M) 250 ± 106 s; I(F) 331 ± 181 s; M(M) 311 ± 138 s; M(F) 368 ± 138 s; T(M) 316 ± 136 s; and T(F) 334 ± 120 s), Grace (I(M) 180 ± 90 s; I(F) 213 ± 96 s; M(M) 213 ± 93 s; M(F) 238 ± 100 s; T(M) 228 ± 63 s; and T(F) 223 ± 69 s), Helen (I(M) 9.5 ± 1.9 min; I(F) 11.1 ± 2.4 min; M(M) 10.2 ± 2.0 min; M(F) 11.5 ± 2.3 min; T(M) 9.4 ± 1.6 min; and T(F) 12.7 ± 1.9 min), F50 (I(M) 24.4 ± 5.9 min; I(F) 27.3 ± 6.9 min; M(M) 26.7 ± 6.1 min; M(F) 28.2 ± 6.0 min; T(M) 25.9 ± 7.9 min; and T(F) 28.3 ± 8.1 min), and FGB (I(M) 335 ± 65 repetitions; I(F) 292 ± 62 repetitions; M(M) 311 ± 59 repetitions; M(F) 280 ± 54 repetitions; T(M) 279 ± 44 repetitions; and T(F) 238 ± 35 repetitions). These values were then used to calculate normative percentile (in deciles) values for each category within each workout. Separate, one-way analyses of variance revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences between categories for each workout. CONCLUSIONS: These normative values can be used to assess proficiency and sport-specific progress, establish realistic training goals, and for standard inclusion/exclusion criteria for future research in CrossFit® practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61021592018-09-11 Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners Mangine, Gerald T. Cebulla, Brant Feito, Yuri Sports Med Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: CrossFit® practitioners commonly track progress by monitoring their ability to complete a variety of standardized benchmark workouts within a typical class setting. However, objective assessment of progress is challenging because normative data does not currently exist for any of these benchmark workouts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop normative values for five common benchmark workouts (i.e., Fran, Grace, Helen, Filthy-50 [F50], and Fight-Gone-Bad [FGB]). METHODS: Performance data from 133,857 male ((M)) and female ((F)) profiles located on a publicly available website were collected and sorted by sex (i.e., male [(M)] and female [(F)]) and competitive age classification (i.e., teen [T], individual [I], or masters [M]) and screened for errors. Subsequently, 10,000 valid profiles were randomly selected for analysis. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations were calculated for each category for Fran (I(M) 250 ± 106 s; I(F) 331 ± 181 s; M(M) 311 ± 138 s; M(F) 368 ± 138 s; T(M) 316 ± 136 s; and T(F) 334 ± 120 s), Grace (I(M) 180 ± 90 s; I(F) 213 ± 96 s; M(M) 213 ± 93 s; M(F) 238 ± 100 s; T(M) 228 ± 63 s; and T(F) 223 ± 69 s), Helen (I(M) 9.5 ± 1.9 min; I(F) 11.1 ± 2.4 min; M(M) 10.2 ± 2.0 min; M(F) 11.5 ± 2.3 min; T(M) 9.4 ± 1.6 min; and T(F) 12.7 ± 1.9 min), F50 (I(M) 24.4 ± 5.9 min; I(F) 27.3 ± 6.9 min; M(M) 26.7 ± 6.1 min; M(F) 28.2 ± 6.0 min; T(M) 25.9 ± 7.9 min; and T(F) 28.3 ± 8.1 min), and FGB (I(M) 335 ± 65 repetitions; I(F) 292 ± 62 repetitions; M(M) 311 ± 59 repetitions; M(F) 280 ± 54 repetitions; T(M) 279 ± 44 repetitions; and T(F) 238 ± 35 repetitions). These values were then used to calculate normative percentile (in deciles) values for each category within each workout. Separate, one-way analyses of variance revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences between categories for each workout. CONCLUSIONS: These normative values can be used to assess proficiency and sport-specific progress, establish realistic training goals, and for standard inclusion/exclusion criteria for future research in CrossFit® practitioners. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6102159/ /pubmed/30128825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0156-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Mangine, Gerald T.
Cebulla, Brant
Feito, Yuri
Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
title Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
title_full Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
title_fullStr Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
title_short Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
title_sort normative values for self-reported benchmark workout scores in crossfit® practitioners
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0156-x
work_keys_str_mv AT manginegeraldt normativevaluesforselfreportedbenchmarkworkoutscoresincrossfitpractitioners
AT cebullabrant normativevaluesforselfreportedbenchmarkworkoutscoresincrossfitpractitioners
AT feitoyuri normativevaluesforselfreportedbenchmarkworkoutscoresincrossfitpractitioners