Cargando…
Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners
BACKGROUND: CrossFit® practitioners commonly track progress by monitoring their ability to complete a variety of standardized benchmark workouts within a typical class setting. However, objective assessment of progress is challenging because normative data does not currently exist for any of these b...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0156-x |
_version_ | 1783349101179437056 |
---|---|
author | Mangine, Gerald T. Cebulla, Brant Feito, Yuri |
author_facet | Mangine, Gerald T. Cebulla, Brant Feito, Yuri |
author_sort | Mangine, Gerald T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CrossFit® practitioners commonly track progress by monitoring their ability to complete a variety of standardized benchmark workouts within a typical class setting. However, objective assessment of progress is challenging because normative data does not currently exist for any of these benchmark workouts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop normative values for five common benchmark workouts (i.e., Fran, Grace, Helen, Filthy-50 [F50], and Fight-Gone-Bad [FGB]). METHODS: Performance data from 133,857 male ((M)) and female ((F)) profiles located on a publicly available website were collected and sorted by sex (i.e., male [(M)] and female [(F)]) and competitive age classification (i.e., teen [T], individual [I], or masters [M]) and screened for errors. Subsequently, 10,000 valid profiles were randomly selected for analysis. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations were calculated for each category for Fran (I(M) 250 ± 106 s; I(F) 331 ± 181 s; M(M) 311 ± 138 s; M(F) 368 ± 138 s; T(M) 316 ± 136 s; and T(F) 334 ± 120 s), Grace (I(M) 180 ± 90 s; I(F) 213 ± 96 s; M(M) 213 ± 93 s; M(F) 238 ± 100 s; T(M) 228 ± 63 s; and T(F) 223 ± 69 s), Helen (I(M) 9.5 ± 1.9 min; I(F) 11.1 ± 2.4 min; M(M) 10.2 ± 2.0 min; M(F) 11.5 ± 2.3 min; T(M) 9.4 ± 1.6 min; and T(F) 12.7 ± 1.9 min), F50 (I(M) 24.4 ± 5.9 min; I(F) 27.3 ± 6.9 min; M(M) 26.7 ± 6.1 min; M(F) 28.2 ± 6.0 min; T(M) 25.9 ± 7.9 min; and T(F) 28.3 ± 8.1 min), and FGB (I(M) 335 ± 65 repetitions; I(F) 292 ± 62 repetitions; M(M) 311 ± 59 repetitions; M(F) 280 ± 54 repetitions; T(M) 279 ± 44 repetitions; and T(F) 238 ± 35 repetitions). These values were then used to calculate normative percentile (in deciles) values for each category within each workout. Separate, one-way analyses of variance revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences between categories for each workout. CONCLUSIONS: These normative values can be used to assess proficiency and sport-specific progress, establish realistic training goals, and for standard inclusion/exclusion criteria for future research in CrossFit® practitioners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6102159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61021592018-09-11 Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners Mangine, Gerald T. Cebulla, Brant Feito, Yuri Sports Med Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: CrossFit® practitioners commonly track progress by monitoring their ability to complete a variety of standardized benchmark workouts within a typical class setting. However, objective assessment of progress is challenging because normative data does not currently exist for any of these benchmark workouts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop normative values for five common benchmark workouts (i.e., Fran, Grace, Helen, Filthy-50 [F50], and Fight-Gone-Bad [FGB]). METHODS: Performance data from 133,857 male ((M)) and female ((F)) profiles located on a publicly available website were collected and sorted by sex (i.e., male [(M)] and female [(F)]) and competitive age classification (i.e., teen [T], individual [I], or masters [M]) and screened for errors. Subsequently, 10,000 valid profiles were randomly selected for analysis. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations were calculated for each category for Fran (I(M) 250 ± 106 s; I(F) 331 ± 181 s; M(M) 311 ± 138 s; M(F) 368 ± 138 s; T(M) 316 ± 136 s; and T(F) 334 ± 120 s), Grace (I(M) 180 ± 90 s; I(F) 213 ± 96 s; M(M) 213 ± 93 s; M(F) 238 ± 100 s; T(M) 228 ± 63 s; and T(F) 223 ± 69 s), Helen (I(M) 9.5 ± 1.9 min; I(F) 11.1 ± 2.4 min; M(M) 10.2 ± 2.0 min; M(F) 11.5 ± 2.3 min; T(M) 9.4 ± 1.6 min; and T(F) 12.7 ± 1.9 min), F50 (I(M) 24.4 ± 5.9 min; I(F) 27.3 ± 6.9 min; M(M) 26.7 ± 6.1 min; M(F) 28.2 ± 6.0 min; T(M) 25.9 ± 7.9 min; and T(F) 28.3 ± 8.1 min), and FGB (I(M) 335 ± 65 repetitions; I(F) 292 ± 62 repetitions; M(M) 311 ± 59 repetitions; M(F) 280 ± 54 repetitions; T(M) 279 ± 44 repetitions; and T(F) 238 ± 35 repetitions). These values were then used to calculate normative percentile (in deciles) values for each category within each workout. Separate, one-way analyses of variance revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences between categories for each workout. CONCLUSIONS: These normative values can be used to assess proficiency and sport-specific progress, establish realistic training goals, and for standard inclusion/exclusion criteria for future research in CrossFit® practitioners. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6102159/ /pubmed/30128825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0156-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Mangine, Gerald T. Cebulla, Brant Feito, Yuri Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners |
title | Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners |
title_full | Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners |
title_fullStr | Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners |
title_short | Normative Values for Self-Reported Benchmark Workout Scores in CrossFit® Practitioners |
title_sort | normative values for self-reported benchmark workout scores in crossfit® practitioners |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0156-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manginegeraldt normativevaluesforselfreportedbenchmarkworkoutscoresincrossfitpractitioners AT cebullabrant normativevaluesforselfreportedbenchmarkworkoutscoresincrossfitpractitioners AT feitoyuri normativevaluesforselfreportedbenchmarkworkoutscoresincrossfitpractitioners |