Cargando…

Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance

We investigated the validity of a recently developed equation for predicting sprinting times of various tactical loads based upon the performance of a running 3-min all-out exercise test (3MT). Thirteen recreationally trained participants completed the running 3MT to determine critical velocity (CV)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DICKS, NATHAN D., JOE, TAMMY V., HACKNEY, KYLE J., PETTITT, ROBERT W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147825
_version_ 1783349107737231360
author DICKS, NATHAN D.
JOE, TAMMY V.
HACKNEY, KYLE J.
PETTITT, ROBERT W.
author_facet DICKS, NATHAN D.
JOE, TAMMY V.
HACKNEY, KYLE J.
PETTITT, ROBERT W.
author_sort DICKS, NATHAN D.
collection PubMed
description We investigated the validity of a recently developed equation for predicting sprinting times of various tactical loads based upon the performance of a running 3-min all-out exercise test (3MT). Thirteen recreationally trained participants completed the running 3MT to determine critical velocity (CV) and finite running capacity for running velocities exceeding CV (D′). Two subsequent counterbalanced loaded sprints of 800 and 1000 m distances with 20 and 15% of their body mass, respectively, were evaluated. Estimated times (t, sec) for running 800 and 1000 m with a tactical load was derived using t = (D − D′)/CV. Critical velocity adjusted for an added load using the following regression equation: original CV + (−0.0638 × %load) + 0.6982, D was 800 or 1000 m, and whole percentage load was ~15 or 20% of the participant’s body mass. From the 3MT, CV (3.80 ± 0.5 m·s(−1)) and D′ (200 ± 49.88 m) values were determined. The typical error of predicting actual times for the 800 and 1000 m loaded sprints were 5.6 and 10.1 s, with corresponding ICCs of 0.95 and 0.87, and coefficient of variations of 2.9 and 4.3%. The effect size differences between estimated and actual sprint times were small (0.27) and moderate (0.60) for 800 and 1000 m, respectively. The adjustment to CV through the regression equation yields small to moderate overestimates of maximally loaded sprint times for distances of 800 and 1000 m. Whether such errors remain pervasive for prescribing high-intensity interval training is unclear and requires further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61021972018-08-24 Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance DICKS, NATHAN D. JOE, TAMMY V. HACKNEY, KYLE J. PETTITT, ROBERT W. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research We investigated the validity of a recently developed equation for predicting sprinting times of various tactical loads based upon the performance of a running 3-min all-out exercise test (3MT). Thirteen recreationally trained participants completed the running 3MT to determine critical velocity (CV) and finite running capacity for running velocities exceeding CV (D′). Two subsequent counterbalanced loaded sprints of 800 and 1000 m distances with 20 and 15% of their body mass, respectively, were evaluated. Estimated times (t, sec) for running 800 and 1000 m with a tactical load was derived using t = (D − D′)/CV. Critical velocity adjusted for an added load using the following regression equation: original CV + (−0.0638 × %load) + 0.6982, D was 800 or 1000 m, and whole percentage load was ~15 or 20% of the participant’s body mass. From the 3MT, CV (3.80 ± 0.5 m·s(−1)) and D′ (200 ± 49.88 m) values were determined. The typical error of predicting actual times for the 800 and 1000 m loaded sprints were 5.6 and 10.1 s, with corresponding ICCs of 0.95 and 0.87, and coefficient of variations of 2.9 and 4.3%. The effect size differences between estimated and actual sprint times were small (0.27) and moderate (0.60) for 800 and 1000 m, respectively. The adjustment to CV through the regression equation yields small to moderate overestimates of maximally loaded sprint times for distances of 800 and 1000 m. Whether such errors remain pervasive for prescribing high-intensity interval training is unclear and requires further investigation. Berkeley Electronic Press 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6102197/ /pubmed/30147825 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
DICKS, NATHAN D.
JOE, TAMMY V.
HACKNEY, KYLE J.
PETTITT, ROBERT W.
Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance
title Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance
title_full Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance
title_fullStr Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance
title_short Validity of Critical Velocity Concept for Weighted Sprinting Performance
title_sort validity of critical velocity concept for weighted sprinting performance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147825
work_keys_str_mv AT dicksnathand validityofcriticalvelocityconceptforweightedsprintingperformance
AT joetammyv validityofcriticalvelocityconceptforweightedsprintingperformance
AT hackneykylej validityofcriticalvelocityconceptforweightedsprintingperformance
AT pettittrobertw validityofcriticalvelocityconceptforweightedsprintingperformance