Cargando…

Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era

In contemporary management of early-stage breast cancer, clinical decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy are increasingly made after considering both genomic assay results and clinico-pathologic features. Genomic information augments the prognostic information gleaned from clinico-pathologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamounas, Eleftherios P., Russell, Christy A., Lau, Anna, Turner, Michelle P., Albain, Kathy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6
_version_ 1783349130209263616
author Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
Russell, Christy A.
Lau, Anna
Turner, Michelle P.
Albain, Kathy S.
author_facet Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
Russell, Christy A.
Lau, Anna
Turner, Michelle P.
Albain, Kathy S.
author_sort Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
collection PubMed
description In contemporary management of early-stage breast cancer, clinical decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy are increasingly made after considering both genomic assay results and clinico-pathologic features. Genomic information augments the prognostic information gleaned from clinico-pathologic features by providing risk estimates for distant recurrence and/or breast cancer-specific survival based on individual tumor biology. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) (RS) assay is validated to be prognostic and predictive of chemotherapy benefit in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, regardless of nodal status. Because patients frequently are recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy based on the perceived poor prognosis related to a positive nodal status, inconsistent use of any prognostic genomic assay in the node-positive (N+) setting likely results in overtreatment of some patients, particularly those with a low genomic risk as defined by the RS test. This comprehensive review of the evidence for the RS assay in patients with N+, HR+, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer focuses on outcomes of patients with low RS results treated with hormonal therapy alone. Aggregate findings show that the RS assay consistently identifies patients with low genomic risk N+ breast cancer, in whom adjuvant chemotherapy can be avoided without adversely affecting outcomes. This evidence suggests that HR+ patients with limited nodal involvement and low RS results should discuss with their physicians the pros and cons of adjuvant chemotherapy at the time their treatment plans are being decided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61022962018-08-28 Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era Mamounas, Eleftherios P. Russell, Christy A. Lau, Anna Turner, Michelle P. Albain, Kathy S. NPJ Breast Cancer Review Article In contemporary management of early-stage breast cancer, clinical decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy are increasingly made after considering both genomic assay results and clinico-pathologic features. Genomic information augments the prognostic information gleaned from clinico-pathologic features by providing risk estimates for distant recurrence and/or breast cancer-specific survival based on individual tumor biology. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) (RS) assay is validated to be prognostic and predictive of chemotherapy benefit in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, regardless of nodal status. Because patients frequently are recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy based on the perceived poor prognosis related to a positive nodal status, inconsistent use of any prognostic genomic assay in the node-positive (N+) setting likely results in overtreatment of some patients, particularly those with a low genomic risk as defined by the RS test. This comprehensive review of the evidence for the RS assay in patients with N+, HR+, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer focuses on outcomes of patients with low RS results treated with hormonal therapy alone. Aggregate findings show that the RS assay consistently identifies patients with low genomic risk N+ breast cancer, in whom adjuvant chemotherapy can be avoided without adversely affecting outcomes. This evidence suggests that HR+ patients with limited nodal involvement and low RS results should discuss with their physicians the pros and cons of adjuvant chemotherapy at the time their treatment plans are being decided. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6102296/ /pubmed/30155517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
Russell, Christy A.
Lau, Anna
Turner, Michelle P.
Albain, Kathy S.
Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
title Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
title_full Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
title_fullStr Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
title_full_unstemmed Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
title_short Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
title_sort clinical relevance of the 21-gene recurrence score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mamounaseleftheriosp clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera
AT russellchristya clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera
AT lauanna clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera
AT turnermichellep clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera
AT albainkathys clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera