Cargando…
Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
In contemporary management of early-stage breast cancer, clinical decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy are increasingly made after considering both genomic assay results and clinico-pathologic features. Genomic information augments the prognostic information gleaned from clinico-pathologic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6 |
_version_ | 1783349130209263616 |
---|---|
author | Mamounas, Eleftherios P. Russell, Christy A. Lau, Anna Turner, Michelle P. Albain, Kathy S. |
author_facet | Mamounas, Eleftherios P. Russell, Christy A. Lau, Anna Turner, Michelle P. Albain, Kathy S. |
author_sort | Mamounas, Eleftherios P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In contemporary management of early-stage breast cancer, clinical decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy are increasingly made after considering both genomic assay results and clinico-pathologic features. Genomic information augments the prognostic information gleaned from clinico-pathologic features by providing risk estimates for distant recurrence and/or breast cancer-specific survival based on individual tumor biology. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) (RS) assay is validated to be prognostic and predictive of chemotherapy benefit in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, regardless of nodal status. Because patients frequently are recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy based on the perceived poor prognosis related to a positive nodal status, inconsistent use of any prognostic genomic assay in the node-positive (N+) setting likely results in overtreatment of some patients, particularly those with a low genomic risk as defined by the RS test. This comprehensive review of the evidence for the RS assay in patients with N+, HR+, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer focuses on outcomes of patients with low RS results treated with hormonal therapy alone. Aggregate findings show that the RS assay consistently identifies patients with low genomic risk N+ breast cancer, in whom adjuvant chemotherapy can be avoided without adversely affecting outcomes. This evidence suggests that HR+ patients with limited nodal involvement and low RS results should discuss with their physicians the pros and cons of adjuvant chemotherapy at the time their treatment plans are being decided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6102296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61022962018-08-28 Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era Mamounas, Eleftherios P. Russell, Christy A. Lau, Anna Turner, Michelle P. Albain, Kathy S. NPJ Breast Cancer Review Article In contemporary management of early-stage breast cancer, clinical decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy are increasingly made after considering both genomic assay results and clinico-pathologic features. Genomic information augments the prognostic information gleaned from clinico-pathologic features by providing risk estimates for distant recurrence and/or breast cancer-specific survival based on individual tumor biology. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score(®) (RS) assay is validated to be prognostic and predictive of chemotherapy benefit in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, regardless of nodal status. Because patients frequently are recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy based on the perceived poor prognosis related to a positive nodal status, inconsistent use of any prognostic genomic assay in the node-positive (N+) setting likely results in overtreatment of some patients, particularly those with a low genomic risk as defined by the RS test. This comprehensive review of the evidence for the RS assay in patients with N+, HR+, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer focuses on outcomes of patients with low RS results treated with hormonal therapy alone. Aggregate findings show that the RS assay consistently identifies patients with low genomic risk N+ breast cancer, in whom adjuvant chemotherapy can be avoided without adversely affecting outcomes. This evidence suggests that HR+ patients with limited nodal involvement and low RS results should discuss with their physicians the pros and cons of adjuvant chemotherapy at the time their treatment plans are being decided. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6102296/ /pubmed/30155517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mamounas, Eleftherios P. Russell, Christy A. Lau, Anna Turner, Michelle P. Albain, Kathy S. Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
title | Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
title_full | Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
title_fullStr | Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
title_short | Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
title_sort | clinical relevance of the 21-gene recurrence score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mamounaseleftheriosp clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera AT russellchristya clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera AT lauanna clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera AT turnermichellep clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera AT albainkathys clinicalrelevanceofthe21generecurrencescoreassayintreatmentdecisionsforpatientswithnodepositivebreastcancerinthegenomicera |