Cargando…

Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics

The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the richness and diversity of bacteria in samples from diabetic foot infections using a culturomics approach. Bacterial culture findings from wound samples were analyzed together with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jneid, Joanne, Cassir, Nadim, Schuldiner, Sophie, Jourdan, Nathalie, Sotto, Albert, Lavigne, Jean-Philippe, La Scola, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00282
_version_ 1783349150761353216
author Jneid, Joanne
Cassir, Nadim
Schuldiner, Sophie
Jourdan, Nathalie
Sotto, Albert
Lavigne, Jean-Philippe
La Scola, Bernard
author_facet Jneid, Joanne
Cassir, Nadim
Schuldiner, Sophie
Jourdan, Nathalie
Sotto, Albert
Lavigne, Jean-Philippe
La Scola, Bernard
author_sort Jneid, Joanne
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the richness and diversity of bacteria in samples from diabetic foot infections using a culturomics approach. Bacterial culture findings from wound samples were analyzed together with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. We included 43 patients admitted to a French referral center with a moderate to severe diabetic foot infection. The 30,000 colonies identified yielded 53 different bacterial species. The global α-Shannon diversity was 3.34 and the bacterial richness per patient was 4 ± 2. Of all the identified bacterial species, 19 (35.8%) had never been previously cultured or identified by molecular methods from diabetic foot ulcers. Most of the samples were polymicrobial (N = 38; 88.3%). Of all the isolated species, the most prevalent were Staphylococcus aureus (N = 28; 52.8%), Enterococcus faecalis (N = 24; 45.2%), Enterobacter cloacae (N = 12; 22.6%), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (N = 10; 18.7%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (N = 6; 11.3%), Proteus mirabilis (N = 6; 11.3%), and Finegoldia magna (N = 5; 9.4%). The only factor associated with wound improvement after a 1-month follow-up was the presence of E. faecalis (p = 0.012) when compared with patients without wound improvement. This study confirms the complementary role of culturomics in the exploration of complex microbiota. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbiota of diabetic foot infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61023832018-08-28 Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics Jneid, Joanne Cassir, Nadim Schuldiner, Sophie Jourdan, Nathalie Sotto, Albert Lavigne, Jean-Philippe La Scola, Bernard Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the richness and diversity of bacteria in samples from diabetic foot infections using a culturomics approach. Bacterial culture findings from wound samples were analyzed together with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. We included 43 patients admitted to a French referral center with a moderate to severe diabetic foot infection. The 30,000 colonies identified yielded 53 different bacterial species. The global α-Shannon diversity was 3.34 and the bacterial richness per patient was 4 ± 2. Of all the identified bacterial species, 19 (35.8%) had never been previously cultured or identified by molecular methods from diabetic foot ulcers. Most of the samples were polymicrobial (N = 38; 88.3%). Of all the isolated species, the most prevalent were Staphylococcus aureus (N = 28; 52.8%), Enterococcus faecalis (N = 24; 45.2%), Enterobacter cloacae (N = 12; 22.6%), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (N = 10; 18.7%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (N = 6; 11.3%), Proteus mirabilis (N = 6; 11.3%), and Finegoldia magna (N = 5; 9.4%). The only factor associated with wound improvement after a 1-month follow-up was the presence of E. faecalis (p = 0.012) when compared with patients without wound improvement. This study confirms the complementary role of culturomics in the exploration of complex microbiota. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbiota of diabetic foot infections. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6102383/ /pubmed/30155447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00282 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jneid, Cassir, Schuldiner, Jourdan, Sotto, Lavigne and La Scola. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Jneid, Joanne
Cassir, Nadim
Schuldiner, Sophie
Jourdan, Nathalie
Sotto, Albert
Lavigne, Jean-Philippe
La Scola, Bernard
Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
title Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
title_full Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
title_fullStr Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
title_short Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
title_sort exploring the microbiota of diabetic foot infections with culturomics
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00282
work_keys_str_mv AT jneidjoanne exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics
AT cassirnadim exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics
AT schuldinersophie exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics
AT jourdannathalie exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics
AT sottoalbert exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics
AT lavignejeanphilippe exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics
AT lascolabernard exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics