Cargando…
Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics
The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the richness and diversity of bacteria in samples from diabetic foot infections using a culturomics approach. Bacterial culture findings from wound samples were analyzed together with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00282 |
_version_ | 1783349150761353216 |
---|---|
author | Jneid, Joanne Cassir, Nadim Schuldiner, Sophie Jourdan, Nathalie Sotto, Albert Lavigne, Jean-Philippe La Scola, Bernard |
author_facet | Jneid, Joanne Cassir, Nadim Schuldiner, Sophie Jourdan, Nathalie Sotto, Albert Lavigne, Jean-Philippe La Scola, Bernard |
author_sort | Jneid, Joanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the richness and diversity of bacteria in samples from diabetic foot infections using a culturomics approach. Bacterial culture findings from wound samples were analyzed together with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. We included 43 patients admitted to a French referral center with a moderate to severe diabetic foot infection. The 30,000 colonies identified yielded 53 different bacterial species. The global α-Shannon diversity was 3.34 and the bacterial richness per patient was 4 ± 2. Of all the identified bacterial species, 19 (35.8%) had never been previously cultured or identified by molecular methods from diabetic foot ulcers. Most of the samples were polymicrobial (N = 38; 88.3%). Of all the isolated species, the most prevalent were Staphylococcus aureus (N = 28; 52.8%), Enterococcus faecalis (N = 24; 45.2%), Enterobacter cloacae (N = 12; 22.6%), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (N = 10; 18.7%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (N = 6; 11.3%), Proteus mirabilis (N = 6; 11.3%), and Finegoldia magna (N = 5; 9.4%). The only factor associated with wound improvement after a 1-month follow-up was the presence of E. faecalis (p = 0.012) when compared with patients without wound improvement. This study confirms the complementary role of culturomics in the exploration of complex microbiota. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbiota of diabetic foot infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6102383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61023832018-08-28 Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics Jneid, Joanne Cassir, Nadim Schuldiner, Sophie Jourdan, Nathalie Sotto, Albert Lavigne, Jean-Philippe La Scola, Bernard Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the richness and diversity of bacteria in samples from diabetic foot infections using a culturomics approach. Bacterial culture findings from wound samples were analyzed together with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. We included 43 patients admitted to a French referral center with a moderate to severe diabetic foot infection. The 30,000 colonies identified yielded 53 different bacterial species. The global α-Shannon diversity was 3.34 and the bacterial richness per patient was 4 ± 2. Of all the identified bacterial species, 19 (35.8%) had never been previously cultured or identified by molecular methods from diabetic foot ulcers. Most of the samples were polymicrobial (N = 38; 88.3%). Of all the isolated species, the most prevalent were Staphylococcus aureus (N = 28; 52.8%), Enterococcus faecalis (N = 24; 45.2%), Enterobacter cloacae (N = 12; 22.6%), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (N = 10; 18.7%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (N = 6; 11.3%), Proteus mirabilis (N = 6; 11.3%), and Finegoldia magna (N = 5; 9.4%). The only factor associated with wound improvement after a 1-month follow-up was the presence of E. faecalis (p = 0.012) when compared with patients without wound improvement. This study confirms the complementary role of culturomics in the exploration of complex microbiota. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbiota of diabetic foot infections. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6102383/ /pubmed/30155447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00282 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jneid, Cassir, Schuldiner, Jourdan, Sotto, Lavigne and La Scola. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cellular and Infection Microbiology Jneid, Joanne Cassir, Nadim Schuldiner, Sophie Jourdan, Nathalie Sotto, Albert Lavigne, Jean-Philippe La Scola, Bernard Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics |
title | Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics |
title_full | Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics |
title_fullStr | Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics |
title_short | Exploring the Microbiota of Diabetic Foot Infections With Culturomics |
title_sort | exploring the microbiota of diabetic foot infections with culturomics |
topic | Cellular and Infection Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jneidjoanne exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics AT cassirnadim exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics AT schuldinersophie exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics AT jourdannathalie exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics AT sottoalbert exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics AT lavignejeanphilippe exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics AT lascolabernard exploringthemicrobiotaofdiabeticfootinfectionswithculturomics |