Cargando…

Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups

Identifying geographical areas with the greatest representation of the tree of life is an important goal for the management and conservation of biodiversity. While there are methods available for using a single phylogenetic tree to assess spatial patterns of biodiversity, there has been limited expl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González‐Orozco, Carlos E., Mishler, Brent D., Miller, Joseph T., Laffan, Shawn W., Knerr, Nunzio, Unmack, Peter, Georges, Arthur, Thornhill, Andrew H., Rosauer, Dan F., Gruber, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1747
_version_ 1783349190679592960
author González‐Orozco, Carlos E.
Mishler, Brent D.
Miller, Joseph T.
Laffan, Shawn W.
Knerr, Nunzio
Unmack, Peter
Georges, Arthur
Thornhill, Andrew H.
Rosauer, Dan F.
Gruber, Bernd
author_facet González‐Orozco, Carlos E.
Mishler, Brent D.
Miller, Joseph T.
Laffan, Shawn W.
Knerr, Nunzio
Unmack, Peter
Georges, Arthur
Thornhill, Andrew H.
Rosauer, Dan F.
Gruber, Bernd
author_sort González‐Orozco, Carlos E.
collection PubMed
description Identifying geographical areas with the greatest representation of the tree of life is an important goal for the management and conservation of biodiversity. While there are methods available for using a single phylogenetic tree to assess spatial patterns of biodiversity, there has been limited exploration of how separate phylogenies from multiple taxonomic groups can be used jointly to map diversity and endemism. Here, we demonstrate how to apply different phylogenetic approaches to assess biodiversity across multiple taxonomic groups. We map spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity/endemism to identify concordant areas with the greatest representation of biodiversity across multiple taxa and demonstrate the approach by applying it to the Murray–Darling basin region of southeastern Australia. The areas with significant centers of phylogenetic diversity and endemism were distributed differently for the five taxonomic groups studied (plant genera, fish, tree frogs, acacias, and eucalypts); no strong shared patterns across all five groups emerged. However, congruence was apparent between some groups in some parts of the basin. The northern region of the basin emerges from the analysis as a priority area for future conservation initiatives focused on eucalypts and tree frogs. The southern region is particularly important for conservation of the evolutionary heritage of plants and fishes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61025562018-08-27 Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups González‐Orozco, Carlos E. Mishler, Brent D. Miller, Joseph T. Laffan, Shawn W. Knerr, Nunzio Unmack, Peter Georges, Arthur Thornhill, Andrew H. Rosauer, Dan F. Gruber, Bernd Ecol Evol Original Research Identifying geographical areas with the greatest representation of the tree of life is an important goal for the management and conservation of biodiversity. While there are methods available for using a single phylogenetic tree to assess spatial patterns of biodiversity, there has been limited exploration of how separate phylogenies from multiple taxonomic groups can be used jointly to map diversity and endemism. Here, we demonstrate how to apply different phylogenetic approaches to assess biodiversity across multiple taxonomic groups. We map spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity/endemism to identify concordant areas with the greatest representation of biodiversity across multiple taxa and demonstrate the approach by applying it to the Murray–Darling basin region of southeastern Australia. The areas with significant centers of phylogenetic diversity and endemism were distributed differently for the five taxonomic groups studied (plant genera, fish, tree frogs, acacias, and eucalypts); no strong shared patterns across all five groups emerged. However, congruence was apparent between some groups in some parts of the basin. The northern region of the basin emerges from the analysis as a priority area for future conservation initiatives focused on eucalypts and tree frogs. The southern region is particularly important for conservation of the evolutionary heritage of plants and fishes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6102556/ /pubmed/30151122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1747 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
González‐Orozco, Carlos E.
Mishler, Brent D.
Miller, Joseph T.
Laffan, Shawn W.
Knerr, Nunzio
Unmack, Peter
Georges, Arthur
Thornhill, Andrew H.
Rosauer, Dan F.
Gruber, Bernd
Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
title Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
title_full Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
title_fullStr Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
title_full_unstemmed Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
title_short Assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
title_sort assessing biodiversity and endemism using phylogenetic methods across multiple taxonomic groups
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1747
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezorozcocarlose assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT mishlerbrentd assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT millerjosepht assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT laffanshawnw assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT knerrnunzio assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT unmackpeter assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT georgesarthur assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT thornhillandrewh assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT rosauerdanf assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups
AT gruberbernd assessingbiodiversityandendemismusingphylogeneticmethodsacrossmultipletaxonomicgroups