Cargando…

Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol

BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injuries are known to be rare and often overlooked injuries that can cause long-term disability and pain when missed or treated incorrectly. The wide variety of Lisfranc injuries ranges from subtle ligament distensions to open fracture dislocations. The treatment of Lisfranc joi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ponkilainen, Ville T., Mattila, Ville M., Laine, Heikki-Jussi, Paakkala, Antti, Mäenpää, Heikki M., Haapasalo, Heidi H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2222-4
_version_ 1783349255483686912
author Ponkilainen, Ville T.
Mattila, Ville M.
Laine, Heikki-Jussi
Paakkala, Antti
Mäenpää, Heikki M.
Haapasalo, Heidi H.
author_facet Ponkilainen, Ville T.
Mattila, Ville M.
Laine, Heikki-Jussi
Paakkala, Antti
Mäenpää, Heikki M.
Haapasalo, Heidi H.
author_sort Ponkilainen, Ville T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injuries are known to be rare and often overlooked injuries that can cause long-term disability and pain when missed or treated incorrectly. The wide variety of Lisfranc injuries ranges from subtle ligament distensions to open fracture dislocations. The treatment of Lisfranc joint injuries is still controversial and very little is known about what types of injury can be treated nonoperatively. The current literature provides only two randomized studies on dislocated Lisfranc injuries. These studies have shown that primary arthrodesis (PA) leads to a similar or better outcome and results in fewer secondary operations when compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in ligamentous injuries. There have been no previous randomized studies of the nonoperative versus operative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the operative and nonoperative treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc injuries and to compare the ORIF and PA treatment of dislocated Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: This study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The trial comprises two strata: Stratum I compares cast-immobilization versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc joint injuries. Stratum II compares PA versus ORIF in the treatment of dislocated injuries of the Lisfranc joint. The main hypothesis of stratum I is that the nonoperative treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc injuries achieves a similar outcome compared with operative treatment (ORIF). The hypothesis of stratum II is that PA of dislocated Lisfranc injuries yields a similar functional outcome compared with ORIF, but that PA results in fewer secondary operations than ORIF. The main outcome measure is the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot score and the secondary outcome measures are Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA), Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS), rate of secondary operations and other treatment-related complications. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period. DISCUSSION: This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial study protocol. It provides details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and methods of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953067 24.10.2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6102864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61028642018-08-27 Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol Ponkilainen, Ville T. Mattila, Ville M. Laine, Heikki-Jussi Paakkala, Antti Mäenpää, Heikki M. Haapasalo, Heidi H. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injuries are known to be rare and often overlooked injuries that can cause long-term disability and pain when missed or treated incorrectly. The wide variety of Lisfranc injuries ranges from subtle ligament distensions to open fracture dislocations. The treatment of Lisfranc joint injuries is still controversial and very little is known about what types of injury can be treated nonoperatively. The current literature provides only two randomized studies on dislocated Lisfranc injuries. These studies have shown that primary arthrodesis (PA) leads to a similar or better outcome and results in fewer secondary operations when compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in ligamentous injuries. There have been no previous randomized studies of the nonoperative versus operative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the operative and nonoperative treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc injuries and to compare the ORIF and PA treatment of dislocated Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: This study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The trial comprises two strata: Stratum I compares cast-immobilization versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc joint injuries. Stratum II compares PA versus ORIF in the treatment of dislocated injuries of the Lisfranc joint. The main hypothesis of stratum I is that the nonoperative treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc injuries achieves a similar outcome compared with operative treatment (ORIF). The hypothesis of stratum II is that PA of dislocated Lisfranc injuries yields a similar functional outcome compared with ORIF, but that PA results in fewer secondary operations than ORIF. The main outcome measure is the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot score and the secondary outcome measures are Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA), Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS), rate of secondary operations and other treatment-related complications. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period. DISCUSSION: This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial study protocol. It provides details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and methods of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953067 24.10.2016. BioMed Central 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6102864/ /pubmed/30126393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2222-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ponkilainen, Ville T.
Mattila, Ville M.
Laine, Heikki-Jussi
Paakkala, Antti
Mäenpää, Heikki M.
Haapasalo, Heidi H.
Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
title Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
title_full Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
title_fullStr Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
title_short Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
title_sort nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2222-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ponkilainenvillet nonoperativeopenreductionandinternalfixationorprimaryarthrodesisinthetreatmentoflisfrancinjuriesaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialstudyprotocol
AT mattilavillem nonoperativeopenreductionandinternalfixationorprimaryarthrodesisinthetreatmentoflisfrancinjuriesaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialstudyprotocol
AT laineheikkijussi nonoperativeopenreductionandinternalfixationorprimaryarthrodesisinthetreatmentoflisfrancinjuriesaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialstudyprotocol
AT paakkalaantti nonoperativeopenreductionandinternalfixationorprimaryarthrodesisinthetreatmentoflisfrancinjuriesaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialstudyprotocol
AT maenpaaheikkim nonoperativeopenreductionandinternalfixationorprimaryarthrodesisinthetreatmentoflisfrancinjuriesaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialstudyprotocol
AT haapasaloheidih nonoperativeopenreductionandinternalfixationorprimaryarthrodesisinthetreatmentoflisfrancinjuriesaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialstudyprotocol