Cargando…

Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study

PURPOSE: To explore the perspectives and experiences of Thai wheelchair users regarding barriers of access to dental services and report potential solutions in terms of customer satisfaction. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We conducted a 2-phase cross-sectional study with quantitative and qualitative com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sermsuti-anuwat, Nithimar, Pongpanich, Sathirakorn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147304
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S174071
_version_ 1783349327887859712
author Sermsuti-anuwat, Nithimar
Pongpanich, Sathirakorn
author_facet Sermsuti-anuwat, Nithimar
Pongpanich, Sathirakorn
author_sort Sermsuti-anuwat, Nithimar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the perspectives and experiences of Thai wheelchair users regarding barriers of access to dental services and report potential solutions in terms of customer satisfaction. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We conducted a 2-phase cross-sectional study with quantitative and qualitative components at a community club for individuals with disabilities in Pathum Thani province, Thailand, in February 2018. In quantitative phase, participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire that consisted of 1) questions on demographic characteristics and 2) adapted questions that were based on the modified Penchansky and Thomas dimensions of access. Enter method of binary logistic regression analysis was used. Regarding qualitative phase, focus group discussions were conducted using the themes of a semi-structured discussion guide. Thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: A total of 156 wheelchair users participated in the quantitative phase. Most study participants had not attended dental care services in the previous year (78.2%). Multivariate analysis found a statistically significant association that indicated that participants who had education level ≤primary education were 3.5 times more likely to had not attended a dental appointment in the previous year (P=0.003). In the qualitative phase, 33 participants were included in 3 focus groups (each comprising 11 participants), they were wheelchair users with education >primary, who did not go to see a dentist in the previous 12 months. Findings of the 3 focus groups suggest generally negative views about Thai dental services for all dimensions of access. CONCLUSION: This study reflects the unheard voices of wheelchair users and provides rigorous evidence in Thai context that difficulties of access to dental services persist. Policy makers and oral health professionals in oral health system should be alerted to the explicit barriers reported, such that equitable and equal dental services for disabled individuals can be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6103305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61033052018-08-24 Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study Sermsuti-anuwat, Nithimar Pongpanich, Sathirakorn Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: To explore the perspectives and experiences of Thai wheelchair users regarding barriers of access to dental services and report potential solutions in terms of customer satisfaction. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We conducted a 2-phase cross-sectional study with quantitative and qualitative components at a community club for individuals with disabilities in Pathum Thani province, Thailand, in February 2018. In quantitative phase, participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire that consisted of 1) questions on demographic characteristics and 2) adapted questions that were based on the modified Penchansky and Thomas dimensions of access. Enter method of binary logistic regression analysis was used. Regarding qualitative phase, focus group discussions were conducted using the themes of a semi-structured discussion guide. Thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: A total of 156 wheelchair users participated in the quantitative phase. Most study participants had not attended dental care services in the previous year (78.2%). Multivariate analysis found a statistically significant association that indicated that participants who had education level ≤primary education were 3.5 times more likely to had not attended a dental appointment in the previous year (P=0.003). In the qualitative phase, 33 participants were included in 3 focus groups (each comprising 11 participants), they were wheelchair users with education >primary, who did not go to see a dentist in the previous 12 months. Findings of the 3 focus groups suggest generally negative views about Thai dental services for all dimensions of access. CONCLUSION: This study reflects the unheard voices of wheelchair users and provides rigorous evidence in Thai context that difficulties of access to dental services persist. Policy makers and oral health professionals in oral health system should be alerted to the explicit barriers reported, such that equitable and equal dental services for disabled individuals can be developed. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6103305/ /pubmed/30147304 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S174071 Text en © 2018 Sermsuti-anuwat and Pongpanich. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sermsuti-anuwat, Nithimar
Pongpanich, Sathirakorn
Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
title Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
title_full Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
title_short Perspectives and experiences of Thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
title_sort perspectives and experiences of thai adults using wheelchairs regarding barriers of access to dental services: a mixed methods study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147304
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S174071
work_keys_str_mv AT sermsutianuwatnithimar perspectivesandexperiencesofthaiadultsusingwheelchairsregardingbarriersofaccesstodentalservicesamixedmethodsstudy
AT pongpanichsathirakorn perspectivesandexperiencesofthaiadultsusingwheelchairsregardingbarriersofaccesstodentalservicesamixedmethodsstudy